[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/lit/ - Literature


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


Why does /lit/ glaze non-dualism when Buddha, Śankara and Guenon do it but seethes about this feller?
>>
he comes across as missing the point on purpose, ultimately he's right of course but it's just annoying to go all the time "huh what do you mean subjective awareness, nothing strange about it methinks!", it's just disingenuous
>>
>>25469173
So it's all just butthurt seethe.
>>
>>25469021
I have only read parts of his work and it seems reasonable and correct. Unfortunately, he associated too closely with the turbocringe freaks in the New Atheist movement so I feel compelled to pettily dismiss him on that alone.
>>
>>25469176
no it's just annoyance at his refusal to acknowledge that even in a committed monist framework philosophy of mind still presents legitimate and very interesting problems
I wouldn't know about all the atheism shit though if that's what you're after
>>
>>25469227
>It was Butthurtism
I see now.
>>
>>25469173
>ultimately he's right
Whatever you say, xister.
>>
>>25469291
What argument are you even trying to make?
>>
>>25469021
because non-dualism is false. read Descartes



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.