Why does /lit/ glaze non-dualism when Buddha, Śankara and Guenon do it but seethes about this feller?
he comes across as missing the point on purpose, ultimately he's right of course but it's just annoying to go all the time "huh what do you mean subjective awareness, nothing strange about it methinks!", it's just disingenuous
>>25469173So it's all just butthurt seethe.
>>25469021I have only read parts of his work and it seems reasonable and correct. Unfortunately, he associated too closely with the turbocringe freaks in the New Atheist movement so I feel compelled to pettily dismiss him on that alone.
>>25469176no it's just annoyance at his refusal to acknowledge that even in a committed monist framework philosophy of mind still presents legitimate and very interesting problemsI wouldn't know about all the atheism shit though if that's what you're after
>>25469227>It was ButthurtismI see now.
>>25469173>ultimately he's rightWhatever you say, xister.
>>25469291What argument are you even trying to make?
>>25469021because non-dualism is false. read Descartes