>I do not believe in "good vs evil" dichotomy stupidity >I only believe in Weak (negative) Vs Strong (positive)So you believe in good vs evil?>NONONONO, don't word it like!!! It's cuckoldry!!!!!!
>>25473250Good and evil are spiritual terms relating to morality. They're not objective measurements of something being positive or negative.Are you stupid?
semantics is the essence of philosophy
>>25473262I can measure good/evil objectively.Make some big scales.Put me on one side. You on the other. Good and evil measured.
>>25473250thing vs thing is not a moral judgment, will to power is a metaphysical principlemoralfags are mentally brainraped
Taoism does this better than Western attempts at transcending the dichotomy. The Tao is genuinely not "good vs evil." Insofar as one of them would even be called 'evil' it'd be Yang, but Yang is as essential for the function of the universe as Yin is.
>>25473295