[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/lit/ - Literature

Name
Spoiler?[]
Options
Comment
Verification
4chan Pass users can bypass this verification. [Learn More] [Login]
File[]
  • Please read the Rules and FAQ before posting.

08/21/20New boards added: /vrpg/, /vmg/, /vst/ and /vm/
05/04/17New trial board added: /bant/ - International/Random
10/04/16New board for 4chan Pass users: /vip/ - Very Important Posts
[Hide] [Show All]


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: IMG_7530.jpg (361 KB, 986x1067)
361 KB JPG
Besides the KJV, are there any English translations of the Bible with the Apocrypha noteworthy for their style? I’m looking for a Bible to keep me occupied the rest of my life, and I’d like it to have the Apocrypha since I enjoy the extra wisdom books there and I’ve never read the books of the Maccabees. I’d like to have gotten the New Cambridge Paragraph Bible except, well, it’s modernised, so what’s the point? or the Oxford KJV Quatercentenary Edition, but it retains the typographical errors of the 1611 first edition, so what’s the point? It’s impossible to lay hold of Scrivener’s Cambridge Paragraph Bible, or Blayney’s revision with the Apocrypha. So again I ask: other than the KJV, are there any English translations of the Bible with the apocrypha noteworthy for their style?
>>
>>25473332
Grow up. Genuinely. Start reading stuff that isn't Semitic mysticism.



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.