physical are obviously superior, but are they worth the money?
note that I'm trying to justify to myself to spend money on bookscurrently want to buy a couple of them
I switched to digital a year ago and never looked back.If I really value a book I might consider buying an original or high quality physical edition though.
>>25487771do you find it harder to focus with digital, they claim that it makes people do a lot of scrolling, zooming and faffing about
>>2548775For an expensive text I would check ebay for cheap secondhand copies with pictures on them. Amazon price is bloated.
>>25487755This?Is it a zionist-christian take?
>>25487780Very rarely I have to use zoom on pages of books which are badly scanned (because I paid nothing for it lol).Scrolling and flickering around is not an issue with my e-reader because switching pages takes a second to load.
i like having a built-in dictionary, and being able to see how long each chapter is helps too
>>25487816I don't think so, it's a scholarly work without equal
>>25487751I read on my phone at night and it's more useful but less comfortable on the eyes than a book, though more comfortable to hold. I don't wanna actually buy an ebook though because I'm building a library for my future children, as I don't wanna give them a screen of any kind.Physical is always worth the money long term, but if it's just to get the content inside your noggin then no they aren't.
I read physical books because I am a physical man in a physical world and all these screens are trying to make me as shallow as they are.
I read digital just out of convenience. Easier to carry a tablet with me in my pocket than a full book, plus the sheer amount you can store on them. You do miss out on the tactile sensation of flipping through a physical book but I also enjoy the part of downloading and organising my ebooks on my computer. Reminds me of doing the same with my music on iTunes years ago
>>25487751>obviously superiorNot so.
>>25487926digital stuff is for the proles, the scholarly aristocrats stick to physical
I've only just got space for a phsycial bookshelf now.Do you guys buy all your books brand new? I was thinking of getting a whole collection of favorites second hand for cheap but part of me thinks that may be in poor taste.
i just cant make it through a e book, i just cant focus enough to make it through. on the other hand, i love audio books with all my heart.
>>25487751>cropped ai slop from googleJesus Christ I hope you're baiting
>>25487940Well, you can get 1 new book or 5 used ones for the same price. Buying used is the way to go.
>>2548795not that anon Used books are worse than piracy for supporting authors and publishers.
>>2588158Not really. The assumption that the book will be resold is built into the initial price. On the other hand, engaging in piracy involves distributing an illegitimate copy of the work, kind of like bringing an homonculus into existence.
I spend about $86 per book and yeah, they're worth it to me
>>25487751Digital is great for traveling, but physical is nice for sharing. Every physical book I've got is something someone gave me, or I intend to share with someone else. They also look nice on my shelf, but I need the space for them.
>>25487751Audiobook for readingPrint book for display/reference (hardcover only)
I almost exclusively read print books. Some studies have shown that retention is decreased when using ebooks, and I've anecdotally confirmed this. I also feel physical books are superior because it's easier to go back and forth between pages when necessary. And of course there's the sentimental aspect of owning and holding a book, as well as the aesthetic value of them. I like ebooks for stuff like textbooks where I plan to take plenty of notes and do work on a piece of paper, and I'll use ebooks for hard to find/expensive books or books I'm really not interested in purchasing, but the vast majority of my books are physical copies. I get them used and pretty cheap from Thriftbooks so it's hardly an issue for me.
Why are ebooks published in South Africa so goddamned expensive?
>>25487751I agree that print is superior, but very strongly recommend that you buy an e-reader, jailbreak it, and figure out how to pirate. Even more highly recommended is one of those pocket e-readers. There's plenty of books I want to read that are too rare and/or expensive but almost always have a digital version I can download. Even considering the second-hand book market, a jailbroken e-reader+Anna's Archive would pay for itself very quickly. Having a palm-sized e-reader has also helped me read way more.TLDR; If you don't have a bunch of money to spend on books, you'd be retarded not to get an e-reader.
>>25487751Using an ebook or listening to an audiobook doesn't count as reading.
i get an e reader because of anna. if it warent for piracy i wouldnt get one. still buy physical too tho
>>25487864Justify your OCD anon. Your kids won't want to read your books. Accumulating stuff is peak boomer energy.
>>25488561>Your kids won't want to read your books>Acting like they'll have a choice when they know of no better alternative except playing with their toys for the nth time or waiting for us to go out somewhereIt's not like I'm only buying dry stuff for a child. I always buy the prettiest editions with etchings. People like Jung and Rousseau themselves explained that they started by reading everything that was in their parent's library.
idk about that mane, I've been reading on my phone with redist (anon recommended, and its been pretty good). I get to go on my balcony at night and just chill while I read, and I dont have to turn on any lights and attract all the mosquitoes, its also way more comfy to read in bed. Now I kinda wanna get a kindle I can use pirated stuff on but I imagine its not as comfy in bed since you can't just lay on the side since that thing is bulky. Physical books do have that collectible factor tho and annotating is easier if you're actually studying shit
>>25487751>paper booksfixed font>digital bookswhatever font you want
>>25487751620, mostly hardcopy, books = roughly 6' x 8' section of bookshelves.
For a long time now I've felt that even serious reading people are much too precious about books as-aesthetic-objects rather than as conveyances-of-textI've reformatted some of my books for letter size paper, printed them, and put them into 3-ring bindersThis has many advantages; arbitrary font/spacing, arbitrary dividers, pockets to keep notes (or I can add extra pages myself), lays flat on a desk or table, waterproof exterior, pages are easily replaceable, I can choose my preferred illustrations where applicable, I can correct errors/mistranslations in the original texts or make stylistic changes (like rendering of foreign names), etc.I genuinely don't know why this isn't more common or more commonly recommended
>>25488583My kindle is lighter than my phone
>>25487751Only good thing about digital is that they are FREE
Take the audiobook pill and listen on your phone or a dedicated mp3 player!
>>25487771This is da wae
>Release free book>Have a 100,000 marketing budget>Shill it anywhere and everywhere for a year>Become auto-famousE-books. Sorry Boomies.
>>25488448Why do people need to jailbreak their e-readers for pirated books? I download them and use the Amazon send for my Kindle. I didn't need to jailbreak it.
>>25487751Digital books are free after you buy your e-reader. Buying the physical book is no longe about, is the book worth it? but is the marginal improvement in the experience worth it?Physical books are superior most of the time but not all the time, sometimes you need to hit that ctrl+f, ctrl+c, ctrl+v.
>>25488561>>25488570You overlook a key point which is that having lots of books in the home normalises reading for children. I hate seeing people's homes where there's no books, the entire living room is set out around a huge tv, no ones eats at the dinner table, and so on. Small things like that actually have a big impact on success later in life.>>25489566Isn't it so the can read epub format?
I think an e-reader is very good purchase if you read a lot.>doesn't strain your eyes because there's no harsh blue backlight>can still read in dimly lit environments>much lighter and more compact compared to physical books, especially large door stoppers>can change the font and text size to your preference>almost infinite amount of books from piracyOne of the better purchases I've made.
>>25489674Recommend me one
>>25487940I almost exclusively buy second hand books because in regards to paperbacks (sci-fi), the modern editions are mostly inferior, either quality wise or in regards to the cover art.Most of the books I've bought recently weren't exactly cheap though but that's the thing when you want to buy US vintage paperbacks and live in Germany.Book is $10, shipping, taxes and other bullshit are $20.
>>25490267I own a Kobo and have no complaints.
I have a Kobo that I used for a while when reading fiction but I stopped. I prefer reading on the phone, easier sync, one carry one thing, more responsive, but most importantly you can google shit and use wikipedia or search pictures, which I do often when reading non fiction.The blue light thing is a bit of a meme also, I don't see the difference, the one benefit eink has ime is reading outside on a sunny day. In the dark phone is more practical
BOTHCHADS WHERE WE AT
I don't understand the blue light thing. You can set your phone/monitor to "no blue light" is it fake?
