[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/lit/ - Literature

Name
Spoiler?[]
Options
Comment
Verification
4chan Pass users can bypass this verification. [Learn More] [Login]
File[]
  • Please read the Rules and FAQ before posting.

08/21/20New boards added: /vrpg/, /vmg/, /vst/ and /vm/
05/04/17New trial board added: /bant/ - International/Random
10/04/16New board for 4chan Pass users: /vip/ - Very Important Posts
[Hide] [Show All]


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: ecclesiastes 1-9-10.jpg (146 KB, 728x515)
146 KB JPG
ill start
>>
>>25492421
just wait until you get to chapter 9, truth nukes by the truck load
>>
>>25492421
Only worthwhile book in the Bible.
>>
>Old Testament
Jewish noncesense
>>
>>25494262
>cant refute the verse
many such cases
>>
>>25494262
>prejudice against jews means rejecting their wisdom
stupid
>>
>>25494565
You are a poopy monkey nigger. You've never been called that before. Verse debunked.
>>
File: 1779716662461582.jpg (248 KB, 840x720)
248 KB JPG
>>25492421
indeed...indeed....
>>
>>25492421
trvthsvpernova
>>
>The thing that hath been, it is that which shall be; and that which is done is that which shall be done: and there is no new thing under the sun.
>Is there any thing whereof it may be said, See, this is new? it hath been already of old time, which was before us.
FTFY.
>>
File: looks at larp.gif (987 KB, 480x470)
987 KB GIF
>>25494629
>>
File: 1e1_jpg.png (616 KB, 957x1090)
616 KB PNG
>>25492421
trvke
>>
>>25492421
I'm probably missing something here, but this feels like a pointless idea, since you can just expand the category until it is something that already exists. For example, when color TV was created, that was technically something new - but anyone could say "color has been added to things before, so this is nothing new, actually!". Everything is technically under the category of "something" and since "something" has always existed, then you can say that nothing is truly new, since it is the same thing. But is that line of thought really worth anything?

Or maybe this is meant more along the lines of things existing in the collective subsconscious before being truly manifested - something like what the question "is music discovered or invented" touches on.
>>
>>25496039
when it comes to wisdom literature, it really clicks with you hard once youve internalized what the text is talking about before you read it. so for example, Ecclesiastes really rocked my world when i was twenty because id been thinking very much about how people say stuff like "everyday feels the same" or "my youth went by in a flash" - then i stumbled across this book that elaborated on the idea i had percolating. but if i read Ecclesiastes when i was 12, and my head was full of desires to play Luigis Mansion or some shit, i wouldve had no connection to it and would have dropped it

what im trying to say is that Ecclesiastes means a lot to you when you want to start being creative, and youre paranoid that youll never make something "new." in reality, youre not trying to make something new as a creative, youre simply reorganizing older things - thus, anything is possible, every existing thing is just a reorganization of things that existed before its time, and the answers to your paranoia and lack of confidence are within you and your ability to sit down and practice and put your favorite things together in your voice. when you conceive of things as new, of somehow being composed of elements you dont understand, it can seem like the answer is outside of yourself, and thats what Ecclesiastes is trying to correct. does that make any sense? Meister Eckhart's sermons and Buddhist koans use similar language if youre curious
>>
>>25496145
Hm, I think I understand what you're getting at. Probably would be better to read the text myself. It is a nice thought, that everything is actually familiar and able to be broken down into understandable elements.

>it can seem like the answer is outside of yourself, and thats what Ecclesiastes is trying to correct

"The answer was inside you all along" seems like a bit of pop-spirituality nonsense at first, but thinking about it, it does seem like it could be useful. Relying on inner strength and such.
>>
>>25496159
but if you think about it, "the answer was inside you all along" is genuinely true. in my lifetime, i used to hate gays and liberals and such, but i realized that my hatred didnt solve anything, and it just made me unhappy. even if the way they live is somehow objectively wrong, sitting in my room and thinking about killing them doesnt make my life any better or cause any real change at all - realizing that i cant directly control the way other people act was a mental change and it made me feel freer, and thus that mental change "was inside me all along." it was a matter of learning and reflection the whole time, even though it appeared like the gays or the jews or the whoevers were ruining my life

pop spirituality and a lot of new age ideas seem like bullshit unless you go about implementing them in an active, practical way
>>
>>25496182
>even if the way they live is somehow objectively wrong, sitting in my room and thinking about killing them doesnt make my life any better or cause any real change at all

Oh yeah, I had a similar realisation as well, more generally about things annoying me online. When I was younger and saw someone write something that infuriated me, I would let it live in my head, and I'd argue with them in my head, and I'd just give it more and more power. But eventually, I realised that - I can choose what to think about. It's obvious, but it really did clean up my mind, so to speak. Now, when I see someone write something that annoys me or makes me feel unpleasant, I just tell myself something like "hm, there are people out there who think this" and move on.

It's still important to think critically and all, but at the same time, it's not good when you let anyone and anything live in your mind.
>>
>>25494257
>>25494262
I wonder how it feels to type like this, pretending you're the next Arthur Schopenhauer in your black t-shirt and cargo shorts.
>>
>>25496218
ESL?
>>
>>25496220
No. White English-speaker. Only tryhard pseuds dismiss the Bible.
>>
>>25496222
>White
You're fooling no one, kike.
>>
>>25496210
my point was that this is exactly what is semantically meant by "the answer was inside you all along" but creatively worded
>>
>>25492421
so did they have artificial intelligence destroying the labor market before?
>>
>>25498058
Luddite is not a new word at all
>>
>>25498064
you didn't answer the question
>>
>>25498058
They called it slavery and tools.
>>
>>25492421
Why is Ecclesiastes so nihilistic? Seems pretty at odds with the overall Christian outlook
>>
>>25492421
What a load of bullshit.

Life is not cyclical unless you make it so.
History is not a snake eating its tail, history is a coil, it isn't the same, it only rhymes from time to time.
Your image should be ripped from the bible and ridiculed
>>
File: azzvup.jpg (137 KB, 890x500)
137 KB JPG
>>25492421
radiation alarm detected captain, they have armed their trvth nvkes
>>
File: 12093121202112.jpg (63 KB, 1080x1073)
63 KB JPG
>Someone might say, "Look, this is new," but really it has always been here. It was here before we were.
>>
>>25494590
Literally and figuratively me.
>>
>>25496222
Or maybe not everybody was brainwashed with that nonsense while growing up? If you're not an amerimutt, it feels very tryhard and edgy to like the Bible. We forget you grew up in a fundamentalist culture.
>>
>They is four things that can destroy the earth, he said. Women, whiskey, money, and niggers.
>>
>>25496218
Kek
>>
>>25500417
>Or maybe not everybody was brainwashed with that nonsense while growing up? If you're not an amerimutt, it feels very tryhard and edgy to like the Bible. We forget you grew up in a fundamentalist culture.
>>
>>25500395
cringe image
>>
>>25496039
tbf when this was written people weren't inventing new technology very often.
>>
>>25492421
>literature
>jewish old testament
anon.......



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.