[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/lit/ - Literature


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: Godong-FR606240A.jpg (92 KB, 1080x607)
92 KB JPG
Is the TOB still the best option in 2026 year of our Lord?

It is now 16 years old so I'm apprehensive about that
>>
I remember buying it but then switching to a different pdf online because TOB sounds too much like teube
>>
Whoah just 4 more years for a revision
https://www.alliancebiblique.fr/revision-tob
>>
However this doesn't seem very promising
>>
>>25504639
For what purpose?
>>
>>25504675
Bible study. Meaning that it should give historic and cultural context of each book with the objective of getting as close as possible to understanding its most likely intended meaning.



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.