Which book is better?
I don't read ethnic.
>>25504817Filtered chuddy
>midbrow magical-realist world-literature Nobelcorezzzzzzzzzz…
>>25504817Racist
>>25505026>buzzword buzzword buzzword
>>25504817Fpbp. Just not interested, sorry.
>>25504814Idk about Rushdie but OHYoS it's not one of Márquez' best. He has better ones.
>>25505857Rushdie is rather mediocre, OHYOS is fascinating.
>>25504814>rushdieI don’t go to faggy New York dinner parties so why would I read this faggot’s books?
marquez. rushdie is far too derivative, he is almost entirely devoid of synthesis.
>>25505807Exactly.
>>25504817I do but spic literature is overrated and I stay away from anything to do with jeets.
>>25504814I'd need to touch them to decide.
>>25504814I'm not sure.I don't think 100 years of solitude is healthy nor even possible, but at the same time I don't think children should be up at midnight. Certainly not on a school night. I like Colombians much more than pajeets though so I'll pick #1(I have read neither book).
>>25505965>he reads for social approvalEmbarrassing
>>25504814Marquez is more exhuberant and the clear better writer of the two. Rushdie is more imaginative and the fact that he is discussing actual history makes him feel more poignantI much prefer the former