My unusual biblical narrative interpretation. The Golden Calf incident is the decisive moment where the Israelites connection to the God is utterly shattered. Not merely damaged, revised, or under a curse, but completely absent. Although God truly speaks previous up until this event, it is at this point with Aaron’s declaration that this idol (identified as Yahweh) escorted the people out of Egypt, that the voice of God is replaced by a satanic impostor. Going metatextual, the scripture you are now reading itself becomes unreliable. The following “Mosaic” law and its worldview is authored by Satan, the accusatory angel of Saturnian bondage. The prophets thus represent a recovery of the true doctrine of virtue, justice and the universal good hidden by the Satanic priesthood and its dead proscriptions, laws which bring nothing but death through accusation, and atonement through the mindless slaughter of beasts and children. Jeremiah 7:21–23 Jeremiah 8:8Ezekiel 20:25–26Amos 5:21–25Isaiah 43:23–24Hosea 6:6John 8:39–47Revelation 2:9
>>25505104>SaturnianThat's a Latin god, you dink.
>>25505138>ACHSHUALLLY
>>25505104>I have not come to abolish the law but to fulfill itDoes that mean Jesus is an agent of Satan?
>>25505253Why is Jesus represented as the morning star in the book of revelation, the same as lucifer?
>>25505274"Morning star" was a popular honorific for deities and other divine beings in the pagan and early Abrahamic middle east. It wasn't strongly connected to Satan until Milton wrote hus Paradise books.
>>25505104>Saturnian Are you that German schizo who thinks the color green is proof all religions of the world are part of a Saturn-cult?>that the voice of God is replaced by a satanic impostorYou can't support that hypothesis from anywhere in the Pentateuch, and anything that isn't in the Pentateuch is just fanfic anyway.
>>25505182>ACHSHUALLLYWow. Such a cromulent argument, it really does dissolve thousands of years of the Roman deity of Saturn into dust so that we may apply it to ancient Hebrew mythology
>>25505104Why is that bull calf sucking the bulls penis?
No, you're mistaken OP. The golden calf in the desert episode is a thinly veiled jab at the Northern Kingdom written by Judahites. The NK was still sacrificing to YHWH in the form of a bull, which was his original iconic representation, but Judahites had this crazy religious reform in about the seventh century that turned them into iconoclasts. Hell the "do not make graven images" commandment is completely missing from the earliest covenant code in the bible (exodus 21-23). So when they wanted it to seem like the NK priests were heretical they added an episode in the entirely mythical exodus narrative to back them up. This of course served mainly to legitimize the Jerusalem Temple as the only place where YHWH could be offered to. Shameless tbqhwyf
>>25505104>The Golden Calf incident is the decisive moment where the Israelites connection to the God is utterly shattered.No, if that were so God would not, through the Prophet Ezekiel, describe Israel as a dirty whore who is nonetheless still loved by God and to whom God still promises a future restoration. A promise fulfilled in the birth of Christ and that is being brought to completion as the apostle Paul describes in the book of Romans>So I ask, did they stumble in order that they might fall? By no means! Rather, through their trespass salvation has come to the Gentiles, so as to make Israel jealous. Now if their trespass means riches for the world, and if their failure means riches for the Gentiles, how much more will their full inclusion mean!
>>25505411>You can't support that hypothesisHe did support it. The ensuing laws and customs of the Hebrews became evil and vulgar. However, he assumes that it was good before. I wager Abraham is a later story invented by the satanists.
