[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/lit/ - Literature

Name
Spoiler?[]
Options
Comment
Verification
4chan Pass users can bypass this verification. [Learn More] [Login]
File[]
  • Please read the Rules and FAQ before posting.

08/21/20New boards added: /vrpg/, /vmg/, /vst/ and /vm/
05/04/17New trial board added: /bant/ - International/Random
10/04/16New board for 4chan Pass users: /vip/ - Very Important Posts
[Hide] [Show All]


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: copy-of-169-7.jpg (99 KB, 1600x1215)
99 KB JPG
>you can have any book ever made instantly in the palm of your hand, in a form more convenient than a book, and backlit as well
HOLY FUCKING KINO. WHY ARENT THESE THINGS MORE POPULAR?
>>
>>25505211
People who don't use one don't care about the amazing scope of ebook piracy. They don't like reading that much. They like book culture.
>>
They're pretty popular I think?
>>
I've always simply preferred physical books. It's what I grew up reading, and I find a kind of comfort in holding a paper book. I like having a physical library, too, because I lend books to people in my family and friend circle occasionally. It's nice being able to give them something off my shelf.

But eventually your physical collection outgrows your bookcases, and your home can only hold so many bookcases, and the books just start piling up. I'm not the kind of person who likes clutter just for the sake of aesthetics, I'd prefer my book collection to be tidy and easily searchable.

Well, that's one of the chief advantages of a digital book collection. It's much easier to organize and doesn't take up any space. It is also now much MUCH cheaper than physical books, whose prices have raised to the point that it's almost prohibitively expensive to exclusively read physical volumes. I still do read physically, I just don't buy new physical books willy-nilly the way I used to. Even used books are expensive unless you get them at a library sale or in very bad condition. I love library sales, but it's all inventory that is so unpopular they want to get rid of it, so you're panning for gold there.

I like my ereader, now. It took time to get used to it, but it's extremely convenient and a good way to expand my collection again. I'm more willing to try stuff now that it's a lot cheaper to buy into a completely new author.
>>
>>25505211
>get remarkable tablet thinking I read tons of ebooks now
>can only use pirated epub and pdfs or books in the Gutenberg project library
the product is kino, the walled gardens however make this dogshit. If I had some way to borrow epubs from my library via my remarkable perhaps I'd read more
>>
>>25505315
You don't really own your digital collection unless you pirate the ebooks. Proprietary amazon shit is renting, not owning.
>>
>>25505320
>can only use pirated epub and pdfs
What's the problem with this?
>>
>>25505325
half the time the formatting is broken and I would've been better off just sticking with pdf.
>>
They are pretty popular amongst readers
the reason that they arent as ubiquitous as phones is that many people aren't readers, at least to the extent that they need something more than a small physical collection
>>
>>25505320
It can be a hassle but I don't mind it. Reminds me of loading my iPod with albums back in the '00s
>>
File: wool.jpg (60 KB, 466x659)
60 KB JPG
>>25505211
This is how I check out a book, and if I like it, I'll get a physical copy.
>>
>kobo libre 2 5 year review
my overdrive syncs when it wants to. i'll tell it to sync and it doesn't. the battery says it's at 98% when I know damn well I've been reading for hours on it for days, so when I plug it in it stops at 100% even though I know it's not fully charged. when I disconnect from PC it now takes 10 minutes to refresh. boot up takes 15 minutes.
>>
File: 2_932398-603x873.jpg (140 KB, 1397x873)
140 KB JPG
I just ordered the Kobo Clara BW 6 inch model. Already wondering if I should've gotten the 7 inch color model instead. Not sure if color is a meme but it has physical buttons for pageturns and a larger screen.
>>
>>25505515
Kobo sells a remote control for page turns. There are also third-party ones that are even cheaper.

https://us.kobobooks.com/products/kobo-remote

I haven't tried it yet myself, but the Kobo 6" is small enough that I think you could probably use the remote in one hand with the e-reader in the other hand.
>>
it's cute that larpers don't notice the problem that they're riddled with typos worse than printed books (which are getting worse each decade). they just want to look like a smart person.
>>
>>25505633
I actually don't get it.
You're holding the reader in one hand, and when you need to turn a page, you pick up the remote and press the button? Instead of just touching the edge of the page? I'm confused.
>>
Buying neat looking books makes me feel good.
>>
>>25505515
I bought a colour after a while using my bw, mostly because I could. The main issue I have with the smaller claras is that you have to grip from the bottom, I prefer the side.
>>
>>25505211
Let's say you buy a Kobo Libra Colour, the one in the OP image, for $260 and you buy that nice folio case with it for an extra $40 making it a round $300. How many books would you need to pirate before you start seeing savings over buying physical books?
>>
>>25505865
8 to 12.
>>
>>25505865
I bought an Elipsa 2 with gambling winnings, if that helps.
>>
>>25505839
Damn i can understand that. Grabbing from the side seems way more natural. Yeah i think i'll cancel the order and just get the colour.
>>
>>25505277
just go to the library
my library has millions of books. way more than anybody could read in hundreds of lifetimes
>>
>>25505648
The reader is resting in a position close to your face while your hands are resting at your sides.
>>
>>25505925
>millions of books
And none of them books *I* want to read.
>>
>>25505211
You need a third party app to continually announce what you're pretending to read. It just doesn't hit the same.
>>
>>25505315
I got rid of hundreds of books I'd read last time I moved. I don't reread books and I no longer have to go hunting for book 4 in a series because these used book store inexplicably had 1-3 and 5-6
>>
>>25505277
for me it's just because they cost like $150. I pick up books from the thrift store or used book store near me for $1-$6 when something good shows up and my bookshelf has a big backlog. I never don't have something to read so the investment of $150 or so seems not worth it at any given point. My reading is completely guided by what happens to show up at the used stores near me though, for people who only buy new books and order them online and shit the e-reader is for sure the move
>>
>>25505515
Reading old scifi on tawny pages can't be beat
>>
>>25505642
Skill issue
>>
>>25505865
Even used that's like 50 books, so a few months? Plus when you stay to read a bad book you can put it down, theres no sunken cost. I'm looking at you Joan of Arc
>>
>>25506071
Your phone is already an e reader. You can even use an outdated phone without service. People paying for dedicated e readers are fucking morons.
>>
>>25506082
major difference to a phone is that the battery lasts for weeks instead of hours. better aspect ratio for reading too. plus phones are distracting; at least if its your main phone with notifications popping in. might be onto something with the outdated secondary phone though. still id much rather just charge a device once and then not have to worry about the battery for a long ass time instead of having to charge it daily. plus 150 dollars isnt much money to anyone with a job.
>>
Every single hobby has these losers who don't seem to actually want to do the hobby - they just want an excuse to engage in buying things, to create drama and argument, or act as a surrogate personality.
>>
>>25505515
mamma mia
>>
WHAT THE FUG ONE DO I GET REEEE
>>
>>25505515
The 7" is the Libra and it's $100 more
>>
>>25505865
I’ve been reading Greek translations, and specific editions tend to reach into the 30-50 range, so not many. If you’re reading used $5 paperback novels, it would take a long time.
>>
>>25506082
Screen size and eye strain
>>
>>25505211
I've been thinking of getting one of this thang, but then again i read most of my pulps and paperbacks on my phone+moonreader
>inb4 chat notification
I dont have much friend
>>
>>25505211
You didn't read the book
>>
>>25505211
I have a Kobo Elipsa 2e and it's my favourite electronic device I have ever owned. I read textbooks, novels, comics, random instructional pdfs and other assorted stuff on it. I connected it to the internet once to update it and have had it in flight mode ever since and just transfer files onto it via calibre. I also read physical books but the Kobo is my go to just for convenience sake
>>
>>25505211
I'm very excited to enter the kingdom of pirated digital books. Currently trying to choose which device is best for my use case (pirated pdf's of academic text books, with tiny text), thinking about BOOX Note Max 13.3"
>>
I just use a kindle paperwhite from a couple years ago in flight mode and convert my epubs with jeetware calibre
>>
>>25506145
I like how your argument can serve for both sides, representing people who buy lots of physical books because the enjoy the FEEL of the paper in their hands, aka book culture, as well as someone who buy an extremely expensive gadget to not read books in buy show off instead.
>>
>>25505648
The remote is in your butt.
You squeeze to turn the page.
It's a BookTok thing.
>>
File: 242.jpg (419 KB, 1170x1393)
419 KB JPG
I buy books I like or reference often. I pirate the rest.
>>
>>25506352
>That image

a glimpse into the future of what the new world will look like after the return of our lord
>>
File: 1758809985393.jpg (1.71 MB, 2992x2992)
1.71 MB JPG
Bought a paperwhite about 6 years ago, then got tired of jew bezoz's constant bothering, so I jailbroke it and opened an account on MAM. Haven't spent a single dime on books ever since.
Print is nice and all but ever since I got this thing I realized that print
>takes space
>is becoming more and more expensive
>is hard to carry around if you are reading a long book
>doesn't have backlight
>can be tiresome to hold after half an hour of reading
Also
>publishers do not give a single speck of a fuck about good typesetting
>publishers do not give a fuck about paper quality
>publishers do not give a fuck about ink quality
>>
>>25506425
>>publishers do not give a fuck about paper quality
>>publishers do not give a fuck about ink quality

tell me about it, especially study Bibles and stuff like that. Fn horrible. I'm about to take the plunge and order myself an e-ink tablet and try digital reading. The garbage see-through paper triggers my OCD so hard that I can't focus on reading
>>
File: Gripping the side.jpg (760 KB, 1836x2448)
760 KB JPG
>>25505839
Why can't you grip from the side? It works fine on my machine.
>>
>>25506577
I have shovels for hands and there's not much space on the edges. I'm forever adjusting the brightness or somehow zooming or flipping pages by mistake.
>>
>>25506306
Yeah, there's pros/cons to both and reasons to enjoy both.

I like books because I'm old and the analogue world is default to me. I like the tactile sensation of a book. It's easier to quickly parse info and skip to/from footnotes compared to ebooks. I like the look of books, the smell of books, loaning a copy to someone... and so on.
I also have an ereader. I can get endless free books. I can't get ebooks of out of print books that I couldn't otherwise find or afford. Zero space taken up, not dusting, and so on.
I like to read - so I like books AND ebooks.

These losers show up in every hobby and need to be avoided like the plague. The worst I've ever seen is in photography where people will argue and obsess endless of gear and when you dig into it you find out they've only take 100 pics this year - and they're all snapshots of their cat. I realised they didn't actually like photography, the thing they actually love is the arguing and tribal bullshit.
>>
>>25505345
Half the time is a pretty awful rate. Where are you getting these from?
I do have to replace poor formatting sometimes but it's maybe 1 in 20 rather than 1 in 2.



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.