I really like all of ArchBishop Marcel Lefebvre's books ^-^.
I have a little booklet by him, entitled "An Open Letter to Confused Catholics." Pray tell, good anon, what other books of his can you recommend?
>>25512045I listened to hours upon hours of his stuff but never read one of his work. Guess I'll have to read They Have Uncrowned Him at some point.https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mYpMrYEjQFo
He looks like The Goose
>>25512055They have Uncrowned Him is the best book he's written that goes over the scandalous actions which the representatives of Rome treated the seminarians in Écône. It really shows his charitable mind as he never knew *why*, the sense that the investigators of Rome had some conspiracy against all the forms of "Traditional" thinking (notice that there is no such thing as "Traditional Catholicism", there's only Catholicism), but never made any full on accusations against them. So to get a picture of what Rome was doing, and still is doing, was that they've been trying to downplay the literal (material), symbolic, and spiritual sufferings of Christ as the Vatican thought it was too much for the none Catholic and even the Catholic himself, hence the book title. - Although not at the same level but still an attack of traditional prayers, Rome recently removed some imprecatory Psalm about casting down with violence within the Liturgy of the Hours (new calender one ofc) for no stated reason other than they don't want the diocesan priests to have meany thoughts...
>>25512116>It really shows his charitable mind as he never knew *why*NTA, don't know if you know French but in his public talks he mentions freemasons here and there. Talks about the ideas spread since the Revolution (liberalism, "zionism" (after he got in trouble for supposed "racist" remarks he said Jews are the real racist since they have always wanted to exterminate the Christian race), etc). He points to what Pius X said to show that the Church had been getting infiltrated for a while. Then blames weak popes who allowed themselves to be manipulated (Pius XI, John XXIII and after). He had a meeting with John Paul II I think (he also had one with Paul VI so idk if it's the same one) where he talks about the pope seeming okay with allowing the latin mass, only to instantly change his tune in real time once somebody told him to. He also supported Petain and expressed his admiration for some othrt collaborationist figures (he even had a talk with one where all they did was ring the alarm on mass immigration and islam, but the talk in itself was too short for it to be interesting t b h), as well as for the dictatorship in Argentina. And although he has never read Maurras, when someone told him that he wasn't in heaven, he jokingly said that he may be in Purgatory then.All this to say he's a noooticer, just not one versed enough in politics or schizophrenic conspiracies to be able to make such a bold public accusation in one of his books, and always just says "oooh they might be, but I don't know, please refer to what Leo XIII and Pius X said, but me personally ooh I don't know, I just follow the catholicism I was taught." Also he consecrated Richard Williamson kek.
uh-oh, heretic
>>25513030Your face is a heretic
>>25512085What's The Goose?
>>25515623Rian Gooseling
