Is this accurate?
Nietzsche repudiated Schopenhauer and Hitler had nothing in common with Nietzsche.
>>25512766>>25512803More like Kierkegaard and Hegel disagreeing at the start. You also forgot the Lenin and Heidegger level, as well as the unification level below Stalin and Hitler with Lukacs and Sartre respectively where Sartrean existentialism and Marxism get unified
>>25512766No. Both ideologies trace origins to Hegel.
>>25512889Lenin didn’t really read Heidegger. He wouldn’t see the point.
>>25512946This. Nobody cared about Schopenhauer.
>>25512766No, it should be Hegel at the top, 2 arrows pointing down to Marx and Gentile, and then Stalin and Hitler.>" [...] Left- and right-wing Hegelians eventually sorted out their differences at a six-month-long seminar called the Battle of Stalingrad" - Richard Rorty
>>25512766fixed.HEGEL => Marx => Lenin => Stalin =>Nietzsche => Heidegger => Hitler
>>25512766The eternal thread about Marx is responsible for the Gulags, and Nietsche for the Waffen SS. Keep thinking like that, you'll go far.
>>25513088
>>25513088>a six-month-long seminar called the Battle of StalingradNo evidence for the battle of Stalingrad.
>>25513113The difference is you can make the argument Hitler was loosely and indirectly acquainted with Nietzsche's ideas while he knew fuckall about Heidegger's.
>both communism and fascism wound up losing to capitalismWhat would Hegel say about that?
>>25514623Probably that capitalism is not spirit as it isn't the rectification by mutual penetration of the idea's own creation of its refutation. READ KANT PEOPLE
>>25512803>Hitler had nothing in common with Nietzsche.
>>25514611Kinda true. Maybe replace Heidegger with Wagner?
>>25512803You are wrong.Nietzsche did not hate Schopenhauer, he merely disagreed with his negative views.And yes, Nietzsche was fundamental for the nazi philosophy.
>>25515249>The guy who hated strong governments, german nationalism, antisemitism and socialism was fundamental for the german national-socialist party
