Have fascists produced any significant literature concerning their ideology after world war 2?
>>25552896No need.
>>25552896fascism is the most ooga booga ideology. of course they hate books. also most modern fascists are shabbos goy judeo fascists who hate republicanism since it gives freedom to the goyimfreedom and liberty shall not perish
>>25552896Homo Ethnicus - available in archived link. It’s pretty much the only major Fascist work of 21st century. It’s written by one of the Azov guys for internal distribution in Ukraine. https://warosu.org/lit/thread/25425953
see >>25553049denis kapustin is a jewmy post(>>25553043)still remains true
>>25553067Kapustin’s grandmother is supposedly a Jew but rest is Russian. It’s still one of the few (only?) books released in 21st century released by a self avowed fascist? Maybe if you include Pentti Linkola and the Eco-Fascist guys they wrote stuff.
>>25552896It's not exaggeration to say that the purpose of the apparatus of the state post-WWII has been to suppress and eliminate art that has any reasonable chance of proselytizing fascism.
>>25553072>In 2001, when he was 17 years old, Kapustin and his parents moved to Cologne, Germany, under a German government program designed for immigrants of Jewish ancestry.
>>25553067I will while trying to avoid overt antisemitism, say that Jews tend to be drawn to illiberal ideologies such as Bolshevism or ‘blood and land’ style Fascism ie Zionism or Bandera Fascism. It seems like for such a small group the Jews tend to exist on the far left and far right peripheries with very few in the liberal or conservative center.
sic semper tyrannis
>>25552896For you to even be concerned about facism or fascists means you have little enough going on in your life that you could do the research yourself.
>>25553091Not really true. Most of the richer, secular jews fleeing Nazi germany were some kind of liberal or conservative. Henry Kissinger is a very prominent example of something between a liberal and neo-conservative figure from a Jewish background for example. It is only when Jewish people were considering their position as a group in very anti-semitic and opressive environments such as Ukraine under the Tsar, that they really had to think about how to protect the whole group, which manifested as either Bundism/Communism or Zionism i.e militant nationalism/fascism
>>25553395>Not really true. Most of the richer, secular jews fleeing Nazi germany were some kind of liberal or conservative. Henry Kissinger is a very prominent example of something between a liberal and neo-conservative figure from a Jewish background for example.because that's the easiest way to rise to power in those countries. Jews didn't face much persecution in the Anglosphere; if they had chosen radical politics like they did in Russia, they would have faced persecution. Regardless, many of the so-called "liberal" or "conservative" Jews are still hardcore Zionists, who use such politics to pursue their jewish interests. NEOCONS are the biggest example of this
>>25553090Uh oh stinky…
>>25553413I think its unfortunately completely possible to be a liberal or conservative outside of Israel and also be a Zionist. In fact, this was also the position held by the majority of non-jewish liberals and conservatives prior to oct 7. It is only when youre actually boots on the ground in the IDF pointing a gun at a Palestinian child that that milquetoast liberal/conservative attitude of 'the jews deserve their own land' has to be turned into blood and soil fascism.
>>25553395How come Jews in America, the most Jew-friendly society of the 20th century, aggressively pursued policies like the Hart-Celler act? How about people like Barbara Roche (Jewess) doing the same thing, even going as far as staying her Jewishness made her open the borders of the UK to millions of pakis and africans? And what did an apparently Jew-hating Scandinavia do to deserve people like Barbara Lerner Spectre, or the countless migration-pushing Jews before her?
>>25553446because they were liberals. Which was exactly my point.
>>25553446Come to think of it has there ever been a society that successfully assimilated Jews? They’re pushing for subversion and destruction no matter how oppressive the system they inhabit.
>>25553449Why did they mention their jewishness and not their liberalness as the driving cause then?
>>25553456dumbass
>>25553460I didn’t believe you, so I asked you questions. It seems you’re upset you’re caught lying.
>>25553460Kosher boy
Is this thread going to be deleted now that the shill narrative has more holes in it that the official account of October 7th?
>>25553043Here in the US communism is the boogeyman -ism. American politicians don't mind being called fascists. But call em commies and they have to go on the defensive or give up politics
>>25552896
>>25553440>In fact, this was also the position held by the majority of non-jewish liberals and conservatives prior to oct 7.Because there were Jewish Zionists in influential positions in society, with enough media and political power to portray Israel as simply a Jewish state that was created after World War II as a safe homeland and nothing more. They portrayed Israel as the good guy and its enemies as the bad guys. now that information is more decentralized ,the one sided propaganda isn't present anymore as it was before. politicians who didn’t care about Israel or were critical of it were sidelined. Paleoconservatives were sidelined by neoconservatives, and people like Joseph Sobran were also sidelined for bullshit reasons.
>>25553510Israel is the good guy. The Palestinians are quite clear about what they want, are they not?
>>25553562I am not going into this debate here rn on this place. but my main point was that Israel used to have a one sided narrative,and the otherside didn't had the reach to gain attention from normies.
>>25553568Let’s all forget how much money the arab countries rich from oil put in this….. even before social media.
>>25553562The question is who you see as the more legitimate occupier of the territory. Palestine wants the Jews expelled, yes, but Israel also wants the same thing and to impose domination of the Jewish population over the Arab one. Their illegal settlements in the West Bank and scorched earth policy in Gaza show their clear expansionist and ethnoreligious supremacist aims
>>25553446They've been trying to become white to usurp white people since before they slapped the Bible together. Resentment of Athens, then Rome, then Christian Europe. I do think they must have been helped by shabbos goy along the way the entire time and that the secret mafias consist of both.
>>25553395Neo-conservatism is literally fringe Trotskyism but rebuilt into a pro-Capitalism/ pro-Liberalism framework if you read about its origins so it’s pretty much as fringe as you can get while nominally remaining centrist.
>>25553626is it like they want to apply the "permanent revolution" in the service of us imperialism?
>>25553783Essentially
>>25553395>Neoconservatism can also be traced back to political and social conflicts of the late 1960s, particularly the 1967 Six-Day War in the Middle East and the 1968 New York City teachers' strike. These events contributed to a political realignment among these liberals, many of whom became disenchanted with segments of the left that they viewed as increasingly radical or intolerant, including the use of anti-Semitic themes in political discourse. During this period, these figures began to adopt more conservative positions while also developing a stronger identification with Jewish interests, a combination that later influenced neoconservatism’s generally pro-Israel orientation.[29]
>>25552896No. Nobody can make a meaningful distinction between fascism and generic authoritarianism. The only one wjo did was Gentile, and nobody developed his project. It's incompatible with human nature anyway.
>>25553994Fascism is specifically nationalist and harkens back to a nebulous "ancient tradition" or "spirit" of the "people" as its legitimacy. It also involves militarism and veneration of the cult of sacrifice. It's a misused term for generic authoritarianism but is a specific ideology. It cannot be socially progressive or communist, for example.
>>25553091The problem with any and all argumenrs about race, including this one, is that they do generalizations in an illogical manner. While you correctly point out that there are prominent jewish figures in both sides of the spectrum, these remain a minority within the history of the jewish people. You can't take what a minority of the subjects do and generalize it to the whole. Generalizations work the other way around, you must take the behavior of the majority of the sub-group and apply it to the whole, and in that regard, most jews are no different from any other population.
Yep.
>>25553478>American politicians don't mind being called fascists.because that accusation never carries any weight, the word has been killed by overuse
>>25554000Why can't it be communist?
>>25554015It's hierarchical by definition, communism is in theory supposed to flatten hierarchy (although doesn't in practice). Fascism venerates inequality, communism tries to abolish it
>>25554000>It cannot be socially progressivFalse. Utterly antithetical to Gentile's conception of fascism. Gentile viewed the state as an active entity, and driver of history. You are talking about a particular kind of progressive politics associated with leftist modern politics. >sacrifice>communismFascism is a hegelian project, so is communism. The difference is in the role of idealism. Marx rejected idealism, but he kept the hegelian collectivism and the sacrifice for the individual for the the collective, in this regard, the ideologies are not incompatible. >nationalistThis is often poorfly defined. Gentile, for example, rejected the racial pseudoscience of the nazi ideology, choosing to characterize the nation as something akin to the spirit. But nationalism as a term isn't distinctive enough to what a monarchy would classify itself as. "The french crown" = "Rulers of the french nation and people". I struggle to see a significant distinction here. Fascism can only be significantly distinguished from other forms of authoritarianism by uniquely equating it to Gentile's project. It otherwise becomes an undefined epithet.
>>25554018>It's hierarchical by definition, communism is in theory supposed to flatten hierarchy (although doesn't in practice).That's a fundamental misunderstanding of communism. >From each according to his ability, to each according to his needsThis sentence, for example, is implicitly hierarchical. It distinguishes a hierarchy of individual needs and capabilities. The only thing thay communism aims to "flatten" is material disparities, because Marx believes that it is material conditions that drive history.Marx doesn't believe in cultural forces. This is why the term "cultural-marxism" is utter nonsense. Marx believes that it is material conditions and how humans react to these conditions in their environment that drives history. Hegel and Gentile, in the other hand, believe that what drives history is "Geist", idealism and the different shapes that Geist takes in the different civilizations and cultures throughout history.
>>25554007I thought national socialism wasn't fascism
>>25554029>Marx doesn't believe in cultural forces. This is why the term "cultural-marxism" is utter nonsense.only if you subscribe to marxist thinking and reject the assumption that marxism is in of itself a cultural force.
>>25554022>Gentile viewed the state as an active entity, and driver of history. You are talking about a particular kind of progressive politics associated with leftist modern politics.What I meant by this was that Gentile specifically viewed his project a highly progressive in the sense that he believed that this was driving history forward. He viewed fascism as the definition of progress. >>25554022>for the individual for the the collectiveOf the individual for the collective*
>>25553994What do you think of Mussolini and Gentile's relationship, since Mussolini had Gentile ghostwrite Doctrine of Fascism?
>>25554038>only if you subscribe to marxist thinking and reject the assumption that marxism is in of itself a cultural force."Cultural-marxism" is only given that name because they identify the "oppressor v/s oppressed" narrative present in Marxist ideology being also present in these modern social narratives. But this dynamic isn't unique to Marx. This narrative is implicit in basically all cultures throughout history, and the specific distinction as a philosophical tool started with Rousseau, during the French revolution. The term is nonsense regardless of whether or not you subscribe to Marx's ideology. You can say that those who subscribe to Marxism tend to also subscribe to modern social progressive ideas due to some spiritual (cultural) commonalities, but that isn't the same as saying that the ideas are based on Marx's system. They aren't.
>>25554047What do you mean with your question? I think Gentile was the intellectual base for the system, while Mussolini provided the practice. They both failed at their given roles, though. Mussolini handed over both sides of the project to nazi ideologues. And Gentile was unable to defend it or address it's failures.
>>25554035Where did you get that idea from?
>>25554035It's a corruption of Fascism. Gentile viewed The State as the actualization of the collective spirit. Hitler thought that this was in racial distinctions, instead. >>25554062Gentile specifically rejected nazi racial narratives. Mussolini implemented racial policies only after surrendering ideological control to the nazis.
>>25554062mussolini and hitler and contemporary national socialists like willian luther pierce (there are no contemporary fascists)that is what i heard at least
nick land, eli yudkowski
>>25554078I would say that Nazism is a form of fascism, as they are very similar. But the differences should be pointed out, they are mainly in their treatments of race though, that's about it.
>>25552896Imperium Francis Yockey
>>25553994incompatible how?
>>25554088>their treatments of racethose are pretty big differences
>>25554093Yes, I believe so, too. But they are otherwise very similar. >>25554091I believe that hegelian collectivism's utter disregard of the value of the individual is incompatible with human nature. Hegel thwarts this by his use of "historically relevan individuals", which is just esoterics imo. Hegel also predicts an end to art, which I also believe is incompatible with human expression. That isn't to say that the collective doesn't influence the individual, but I don't believe that the relationship is as Hegel describes. Fascism is cannibalistic, as it seeks to destroy anyone that it deems antithetical to the State, even if those are former members of collective. Human nature is wired for differentiation, which fascism rejects. Gentile takes all of Hegel's ideas and predictions and pushes them even further, so it doesn't really solve any of the issues raised by people like Kierkegaard, Schopenhauer, Nietzsche, etc.
Turner Diaries?Fascism is just so inconsistent. Its pure ideology with no material.
>>25552896project 2025 and whatever bannon and miller and theil and elon are spoutingbut those are the only fascists im really aware of
>>25553460Jew detected
serious question: is fadcism bad?Everytime someone criticizes it, they talk about those it killed based on race, origin, etc. but what if I'm not threatened by it?
>>25555196Well first they came for the vermin, then they came for the other vermin, and then…
>>25555200>and thenthey became the vermin
>>25555196>serious question: is fadcism bad?yesAll men are born with certain natural rights that they are endowed with by nature or by God. These rights include life, liberty, and property. The job of the government is to secure these rights. but, in a fascist state, these rights are infringed upon by the very people who are supposed to protect them the government.Fascism historically always establishes a tyrannical system in which there is no genuine rule of law, but rather the will of the ruling group. Such a system cannot establish a proper rule of law.Historically, fascist regimes have pursued interventionist economic policies, which can hamper free trade. Without free trade, nations can't achieve economic prosperity.Just ask yourself a question: If fascist policies and leaders were so great, wouldn't they naturally win elections, since people would vote for the government that made their lives better? Why, then, did fascist regimes need to suppress or abolish elections
>>25555289>intrinsic rights>contemporary view of government's duties>will of the ruling group>why good doesn't win elections>no free trade = no prosperityare you serious?
>>25553994>>25555289>>25552896Ah yes, the textbook disease of Anglo-Saxon bourgeois liberalism. Spare me the vulgar idealism trapped inside the narrow horizons of John Locke’s property fetishism. To your ilk, "freedom" is synonymous with the private ownership of capital and the "freedom" for a capitalist to buy and sell another human being's labor power. Gentile took Hegel’s objective idealism and degraded it into a reactionary mysticism. He deified the existing bourgeois-monarchical order of Italy. The key fundamental difference that your anti-socialist bias deflects from is that Gentile sought to drown the individual in a metaphysical totalitarian state-worshipping mysticism for preservation of the capitalist order, while Marxism seeks to smash the bourgeois state apparatus to liberate the real, living human being from exploitation. To equate the socialist state where the working class owns the means of production with the fascist state where finance capital uses state terror to maintain private profit is to confuse the jailer with the prisoner because both happen to be inside the prison walls.Gentile’s Hegelian invocations about "spirit" and "collectivism" were merely the idealist superstructure designed to mystify and legitimize the reality of the violent preservation of a decaying and stagnant capitalist base against the inevitable proletarian revolution as class contradictions came to a hilt. Collectivism under socialism is not the annihilation of the individual but liberation of the individual through collective ownership of the means of production to ensure the individual's material security. Fascism is capitalism in decay desperately attempting self-preservation rather than a relative of Marxism.
>>25555362l
>>25555326NTAthey are intrinsic because patterns throughout history show that ignoring those "rights" results in violence against the state (whether physical or just infiltration followed by dismantling) so the rights aren't even something the general public need to be aware of, they are more like guidelines for people who end up in power. Things like access to food, water, shelter and freedom of movement, freedom of thought. Of course, the nation is allowed to defend itself when these "rights" are abused and the general population typically sides with the nation in such cases because abusing those rights errodes the trust which maintains their integrity.Anyways, we don't live in typical times.
>>25552896Is it even possible to be a fascist without believing in politics. Like with classical liberalism, feudalism, monarchy I see the possibility. To aknowledge classical liberalism you simply aknowledge that the government should be built by a parliament elected by the people and that every individual has the right to pursue his own happiness. It shows a realistic way of life most people can agree on, no belief in politics needed. With monarchy it's the same. In feudalism power is perpetrated among a select amount of bloodlines. But with fascism I don't really see the resemblance. The ancients would have probably just called it a retarded tyranny.
>>25552896It's prolly hard to produce any concrete neofascist works when in the west, the winning side kept re-defining 'fascism' as 'something I don't like'. While in the east, fascism permeates within the traditional and nationalist thought so it kinda subsumed 'pure' fascist thoughts. They'd just read Carl Schmitt for actual framework instead.
>>25554179Politics is nothing but ideology, pendejo.
>>25552896There’s mountains of texts written by Islamic-fascists, everyone from moderates like Jinnah to complete lunatics like Baghdadi
>>25553510>They portrayed Israel as the good guyAnd in propaganda, that is the biggest mistake they do.Israel as it has existed since humiliating its neighbors in war after war, also keeps its promises.For the post modernist you can say "israel bad!", because you fail to realize bombing their neighbors in retaliation strikes while honoring paper deals is a package deal. Post modernism struggles with Israel.>>25555196The pillar of fascism is the bundle it proudly displays. But: Fascism is fundamentally a populist variant of a strongman ideology, which is why it leads to a dictatorship and purges. Nationalize the economy in order to not get cucked by market forces, have a 5 year plan, purge a class or two, etc. Make a war on a enemy state to get some clay/manifest destiny, etc.The problem is that once you have started the purges, you continue the purges. Which means any attempt at fascism is going to end with speedrunning into a very top heavy dictatorship, where the bundle of sticks is going to be forgotten unless its nationally important Its a very easy sell because it stats out with medium to high effort reforms needed to make the day to day life in a state very functional, and it has very high inertia. Mussolini would have gotten cucked out of a dictatorship if Italy was a more functional state. Instead they let him commit political violence, and Mussolini got legitimized by the fact he did not end up in jail after a few rounds.The NatSoc would have gotten nowhere if either Germany folded in WW1 after getting bombed, or the postwar did not have hyper inflation.
>>25555478> the winning side keptThe winning side are fascists. Even after they fed LSD to the hippie generation those guys knew who the fucking fascists were.
>>25556349The lsd hippie generation were precisely the first ones to call anything they didn't like as fascist.
>>25556349So why didn't they ally with the fascists when they were in power.
>>25556964But they also are fascists, look at the boomers in the 80s and now.Thats what Pynchons Vineland is all about.
>>25556993 I believe that is also the subject of the famous punk song "California Uber Alles"
>>25556993Everyone is fascist.
a fascism just flew over my house
>>25556993America under Joe Biden was scarily close to a fascist state but I wouldn’t call the average baby boomer Fascist just misinformed.
>>25553043>of course they hate booksdon't look up which books the nazis burned
>>25553452>has there ever been a society that successfully assimilated Jews?No, not even Israel.https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/State_of_Judea
>>25552896Mussolini coined the term "Fascism," but he almost called it "Corporatism."The US will never admit it, but rule by corporations is exactly what they've got. So any book on economics written by a Republican will fit your bill.
>>25557191I agree with the first part but I am not sure about the second. A number of boomers worship their liberal politics and cant see past them. Ive said before fascism is liberalism with all its contradictions resolved. I suppose ignorant is one way to look at it but you could say the same with large numbers of various fascist nations of past.
>>25557191America has been close to or arguably outright fascist for a long time now
>>25552896ofc
>>25557191>fascist>under Joe Biden?The Biden Admin was the most left wing administration since LBJ
>>25557224>Mussolini coined the term "Fascism,"No he didn't. Fascios of both left and right variety existed before him.>but he almost called it "Corporatism."Do you have any evidence for this besides an apocryphal quote that has no source?The corporations of Fascist Italy, the corporazione, were based off medieval guilds and similarly existed to oversee specific sectors of the economy. Like syndicates in national syndicalism. Like exactly but with different names. This is different from corporations in the modern sense, which are is a legal status granted by the government to a company to limit the liability of its owners.This is the same exact same issue when talking about "privatization" in Nazi Germany.It's possible to criticize fascism and capitalism without being a liar but people like you make it seem impossible.
>>25557325Look who armed Azov battalion and Denis Kapustin as well as the “moderate rebel” Islamist fundamentalists in Syria. >labor power suppressed>country ruled by the corporations and mega rich>belligerent foreign policy where one country dictates world policyBiden was as close to a fascist as possible without the overtness of it. Is it Donald Trump who gave money to the goosestepping Azov morons and killed thousands in Donetsk?
>>25557325https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=l8Kb0q84x4k&pp=ygUQUnVzc2VsbCBiZW50bGV5IA%3D%3D&ra=m“The party… is Biden. Biden is AMERICA and America BIDEN IS! Heil victory!” - Rudolf Hess
>>25557367Lets not pretend hes not giving them money either. This shit has been going on since Obama. T
>>25557383America is at its core an imperial state and the face of the republic doesnt change much but Donald Trump is by far the lesser of two evils. Anarchist leaning CHAZ leftists (ahem CIA stooges AHEM) and self proclaimed Antifa are all government operatives and their idiots hence why they spend so much time fighting Trump rather than imperialism. I really wish Trump weren’t the best we had to chose from but it’s just where we are as a country right now.
>>25557325>>25557308Its worth keeping in mind that the corporate integration in USA stayed quite a bit beyond WW2.And it then soured in the late 50s, for a bunch of different reasons, including that the Marshall plan had started to play out its role, but also that maintaining a tight leash integration over more than a decade is hard. Even then, the integration of Monsanto and the US war department, or the aerospace industry into Silicon Valley is very very tight compared to something like Norway and Kongsberg, or Sweden and Saab.
>>25557391Rampant sexism/ anti-LGBT is the only major issue that differentiates Biden, Obama and Zelensky from their 1940s counterparts in the Axis powers. Most of these points are diametrically opposed to Trump like “church and state” - churches and the Pope in particular are the ones calling Trump Antichrist and other expletives.
>>25553478>More dispatches from anon's alternate realityIn reality, there are ZERO who self identify as fascit or racist and tons of people in high positions who identify as communists or socialists.A mere hint of being fascist or racist is enough to cause a huge drama and problems for someone. Being communist, nobody cares.
>>25557367Weird specific criteriaI think opening up domestic borders, giving mass amnesty, trans kids, blm etc are all more relevant.
>>25557582> opening up domestic borders“More deportations under Biden than under ICE” is a meme your side parrots to make ICE seem ineffective despite hating it.> giving mass amnesty,See above. That’s really a continuation of immigration policy.>trans kidsMinority of a minority like 1% of population that Biden only pretends to care about to seem progressive. See also “Sarah Ann Cirillo” trans hero of literal Nazis, the Azovs.>BLM protestsMentioned above. Anti-Trump leftists including BLM are largely a CIA controlled opposition play to divide the working class against one another on race. Foreign policy, rule by corporations, military spending, and all the actually non-clickbait political topics are all far right under Biden. You are like how Zizek described capitalists - “incapable of even seeing what conmunism could look like” because the false glasses of capitalism prevent you. Your left vs right dichotomy is all based on clickbait topics like trans kids and BLM protests that aren’t even barely politics related.
>>25557582Here is a basic overview of the Biden admin from one of my socialist heroes, Russell Bentley of Essence of Time party in Donetsk. This pretty much covers all the main points necessary to seeing truly how Joe Biden was a goosestepping authoritarian.Immigration, trans kids and BLM are all the most asinine controlled Op clickbait topics to fool sheep like you from whats actually going on behind closed doors.
>>25553091>Jews tend to be drawn to illiberal ideologies such as Bolshevism or ‘blood and land’ style Fascism ie Zionism or Bandera FascismItalian Jews were also disproportionate in the ranks of the Italian fascist party. Zionism is contradictory though because the idea was to create a Jewish state but they set up a multi-party parliament which in the beginning had a political spectrum a lot like European countries in the late 40s, 50s. The idea of liberalism + ethnic nation-state sounds more illiberal today but I'm not sure it would've been thought that way (as much) in the early 20th century. Also most Jews in the U.S. really went full-bore into liberalism. Many were attracted to socialism, communism in the early 20th century, but they became normie liberals as they assimilated. Zionism in an American context was also supported more by FDR-style liberals back then. It wasn't especially coded as a right-wing thing like it is now.>>25553994>Nobody can make a meaningful distinction between fascism and generic authoritarianism.Well the fascists believed that they were revolutionaries, and that they had a revolutionary theory (based on some Hegelian gobbledegook), and believed in the need for a revolutionary leadership of committed ideologues and soldiers.>>25557635>Russell Bentley of Essence of Time party in Donetsk.Brain-meltingly stupid stuff
>>25552896Can you please define 'significant'? Fascist is already a very difuse term as is. In a sense, basically everything people consider to be modern fascist thought was created after WW2 with only superficial connections to the real thing. In that sense there was a lot of significant development, even if the actual quality is questionable.In another, there is very little of it. As neo-fascism is a very siloed ideology.
>>25552896Guns, Germs, and Steel. It's not very good, but it made a large impact.
>>25557388I agree for the most part. Trump is torpeeding the american imperialist machine. I dont think its intentional but he is doing it. JDPON Don.
>>25557742NTA but that's one of the problems with fascism. Its pure ideology, with little to no material. Looking at the material (economic) side of actually historic fascism, it did not help the workers it instead helped the big business through subsidies. Ive heard people define it as "reaction in revolutionary clothes" which seems the closest to material we can find but it still has a cultural (ideological) part of its definition.Thats part of the reason I agree that Biden is a fascist, Trump too, they both painted themselves as revolutionary to some degree. Trump with his vague populist notions of "draining the swamp" Biden with his "return to common decency" both did the same thing materially.
>>25557763Except the Israel and Iran issue, Trump lacks nearly all of the expansionist military characteristics that Fascism entails. He’s a normal Paleocon stuck inside an Israeli led party. That’s why the actual Fascists and warmongers call him a Putin/ Kim Jong Un/ Xi Jinping/ Modhi stooge for trying to deescalate the tensions in those regions and not work against them like the MIC wants. He is at best, a capitalist with authoritarian characteristics.
>>25557774I don’t think Biden or Trump are fascist but Trump is way more expansionist. Look at Venezuela and all his talk over Canada and Greenland
Everything by Joshua Sutter and O9A is absolutely essential to comprehend the chuds on this board.
>>25557786"Trump Gaza" he supports Israeli/US expansion.He supports western expansion against Russia too maybe not as loud as Biden but materially he does.I like that Trump won, he is the more brazen of the two evils. Just like Malcolm X said I would rather go against a wolf than a fox.
>>25552896Kissingers doctorate is post war
>>25554018>communism is in theory supposed to flatten hierarchy (although doesn't in practice).Seems hypocritical
>>25557763It isn't. They had quantifiable effects on the states they governed. They just haven't held power anyway since the mid 1940s.
>>25555362The only thing you fetishize is Big Anglo Cock. Your ideology has proven to be a colossal failure.
>>25557866>They just haven't held power anyway since the mid 1940s.Singapore, Malaysia, Indonesia, Pakistan and India are all fascist if we go by the definition anons ITT are using
>>25557895I consider it to be too general, ngl. And regardless, no one is thinking about Hindutva when they think Fascism except Indian liberals who hate it.
>>25557866Aside from cultural impacts its the same in them all. Subsidizing the capitalists.
>>25554316>yapping about project 2025 in 2011+15give it up already
>>25552896>Have fascists produced any significant literature concerning their ideology after world war 2?Yes, Léon Degrelle did.Books by Léon DegrelleThe Eastern Front: Memoirs of a Waffen SS Volunteer, 1941–1945: Degrelle's account of his time leading the Walloon Legion on the Eastern Front.The Burning Souls: Part memoir and part reflection, tracing his life from childhood to his military experiences in Russia.Campaign in Russia: The Waffen S.S. on the Eastern Front: A detailed look at military operations from his perspective within the Axis forces.My Revolutionary Life: An autobiographical volume detailing his pre-war political activities and escape to Francoist Spain.Hitler: Born at Versailles (Hitler geboren in Versailles): A political commentary and apologetic text regarding Adolf Hitler and the Treaty of Versailles.
>>25552906kek
>>25557411What a retarded list.
>>25558119None of these sounds significant in the slightest
>>25557411>>25558235The Soviet Union was fascist.
>>25557786Just way way off course. Biden was expansionist against the third world and he wanted China, Russia and satellites in Africa and Asia like Assad’s as enemies while Trump’s aggression is mostly remarks first of all, but secondly it’s aimed at colonial holdings like Canada, Danish Greenland and the Panama Canal (Chinese holding in new world so basically a sphere of influence issue rather than pure aggression). The actual bad guys like Neo-Colonial EU and NATO hate trump for a reason. America first for the most part is an isolationist party platform and the big corporations like Boeing and RHEINMETALL dont want that.
>>25557838The Israeli war is the only major Trump faux pas and it would’ve happened under Harris the same anywaus because it was an Israeli strike that the US just followed along with because of defense agreements. Trump lacks the corporations tied to the state as well as the expansionist politics of Fascists yet Harris and Democrats represent them.
i hate that this place is now known by tiktok and Instagram types now.it just makes me more of a chud than i ever would be.Mashima also produced some pro facist lit
>>25558235See >>25557635For a clearer succinct breakdown on why Joe Biden is a Fascist.
>>25558401The USA under Democrats is basically Fascist while Putin’s Russia is the American culture and politics of the 30s - 50s. They literally have communist party in state Duna. It’s as far from fascism as can be.
>>25552896Fascists are like marmite
>>25559172>Trump lacks the corporations tied to the stateIsnt Nvidia partially stated owned? Dont we give billions of dollars to tech companies for this "ai arms race" both parties represent the bourgeoisie both claim to represent the worker both parties are fascist.
Yes. Evola wrote a book called Ride the Tiger which I have not read but I own it. I believe it is a guide to staying calm around large cats. Very relevant to my life. He also wrote Men Among the Ruins which I think is about archaeology, so obviously he was a busy guy.There is also a guy called Yockey. Like hockey but with a Y, I checked. He wrote Imperium, which is about Rome. Someone told me it is not about Rome but that person has not read it, and I have not read it either, so it is 1 against 1 and I win because I am louder.Savitri Devi is also on the list, and yes she is a woman, most people dont know that, I found it out by accident while looking for something else and I have chosen not to say what.Fun fact, Evola is not related to Ebola. I looked into it for several days. It is a different guy.The rest of the list is in a book I lent to my neighbor. He says he never got it. I said everything is connected and he would understand in time. He closed the door again. I have started leaving notes.Anyway, if you count the stuff I write here, and you should, I have published more fascist literature since the war than most people. I am basically a small press.
>>25559577Wasn't Evola the laughing stock of the Italian Fascists?
>>25552896hacovin was a fascist
