Thoughts on this? I made it around three years ago. Should I continue the series (up until Plotinus or maybe even the Byzantine Platonists). Post your philosophy charts.
Needs some polishing, desu.
>>25555571Explain
ngl philosophy kinda of a waste of time tho prove me wrong u cant
>>25554554I think it would be more useful to split this up into a branching diagram with different sections like the 'start with the greeks' chart rather than a linear flowchart. Perhaps splitting it into something like a core curriculum, a set of important secondary texts, and more reference works that you probably shouldnt read cover to cover, like Diels-Kranz or Diogenes Laertius.
>>25556413Why would you not read Laertius cover to cover?
>>25556763Too spurious to be useful without critical evaluation of the secondary literature, and kinda too long winded and boring to read it just for fun.
>>25554554What was wrong with the existing philosophy project?
>>25554554No joke who would read all that unless trying for a philosphy degree?
