Do I just start with homo sacer or is there a better way?(I’ve read only a few short essays: one about the concept of adventure; one about pope Benedict’s abdication. But I find him very intriguing)
>>25559041no one cares about him anymore after he's proven himself to be a covid negationist
>>25559060I do, nigger
>>25559041yeah you do sound like a homo sucker kinda guy
>>25559060Yeah the same way nobody is interested in Nietzsche because he went insane in the last ten years of his live or in Heidegger because he got too close to the black sunGot it. You’re a true intellectual.
>>25559041>Homo sacerNo thanks, I don't need another gay woke academic telling me assfucking is sacred
>>25559105Who are the others?
>>25559041The "What Is an Apparatus?" essay is a good one too, as is "On Potentiality" (in Potentialities); maybe The Open too. Otherwise I would start with Homo Sacer, the first two books at least; you don't have to read them all in order, whichever topic is more to your interest then (The Kingdom and the Glory personally is very interesting).
>>25559105if you need academics to know that assfucking is sacred you're unfathomably stupid
>>25559083You sound like a little bitch
>>25559231Your mom is gay
>>25559315I'm okay with that
