What non-incel and non-horny/sentimental books will help me understand female psychology?
>>25566596Tired of grifters.
got bored of this baseless rambling about three or four sentences in
>>25566596Aw you didn't have to say all that for me Anna, you're not ugly, I would've hit on you anyway
>>25566596You know anna is as online as anyone, you can just ask her. Dasha probably wouldn't respond to you.
Published in 1971. Written by a woman. Gives away the whole game. She received death threats from women for her trouble.
>>25566596Redscare and its fanbase is retarded but Anna is always on the ball, which is probably why she causes so much seethe. She is proof that a woman can be self-aware without having to act outside of their nature.
>>25566596Katsap bs
>>25566596>female psychology
tolstoy
before you start asking about their "psychology" you need to understand what something is in relations to "you" and for that i would recommend.also: i would have sex with anna but not dasha
picrel and Anna Karenina are surprisingly good at portraying realistic women.
>>25567723>I fucked around on my wife and she found out and now she's pissed>HOW COULD THIS BE HAPPENING TO ME????Blonsky a real 1
>>25567703idk man she's clearly fine being a puppet for the thiel cinematic universe
The traditionalist writings on masculine and feminine principles are at the very least interesting, and a lot of their predictions have proven correct.>...it is possible ... to establish the correct relationship between the two principles (feminine and masculine). This occurs when the feminine principle, whose force is centrifugal, does not turn to fleeting objects but rather to a "virile" stability in which she finds a limit to her "restlessness". Stability is then transmitted to the feminine principle to the point of intimately transfiguring all of its possibilities.>It is easy to foresee what will become of the relationship between the sexes... What could possibly go on between these mixed beings lacking all contact with the forces of their deepest nature? between these beings for whom sex is reduced to the physiological plane? between these beings who, in the deepest recesses of their souls, are neither men nor women, or who are masculine women or feminine men, and who claim to have reached full sexual emancipation while truly having only regressed? All relationships are destined to have an ambiguous and crumbling character: the comradely promiscuity and morbid "intellectual" sympathies such as are commonplace in the new communist realism. In other words, modern woman will be affected by neurotic complexes and all the other complexes upon which Freud constructed a "science" that is truly a sign of our times.I'll have to read Eros and the Mysteries of Love for a more thorough examination of this topic.
>>25566596you can tell a part of her brain has been hijacked by mind virus buzzwords and it's holding her back. it's like she willingly turns herself into a child, which is great for her argument since it acts as a self-fulfilling prophecy that "woman are all silly oversized children" or whatever. kinda boring and pretentious takes masquerading as something "taboo" and "forbidden"
>>25566596Cousin Bette
>>25567736Getting money from Thiel and friends means she's a puppet? The only thing I can think of that's she's done that makes her anything near a sellout is hosting a Futo talk(Futo are a group of tech autists that are trying to push self-hosted, open source projects.. not exactly the illuminati)The Thiel hate is so forced. No one can point to a talk of his etc and make a coherent argument for why they dislike him
>>25566596I think of a woman like a man, and take away reason & accountability.
>>25567736Yes, I get that vibe. Along with most twitter "influencers", Raw Egg Nationalist is another example. That being said, it doesn't entirely discount all that they say. You just have to be aware of where they truly stand and not be too taken in by it.
>>25567840>You just have to be aware of where they truly stand and not be too taken in by itWhere is it you think they stand / what exactly is there to be taken in by?
>>25566596>>25567687Sounds like pandering, so it's probably not true.
>>25567853You haven't even read Vilar's work.
>>25566596
>>25567853/thread
>25567829>25567850
>>25566596kinda hot looking for a tranny
>this dildo raping me in the ass has the word "Freedom" printed on it >therefore, i am free!
>>25567850>Where is it you think they standWith the antichrist, whether they know it or not.
>>25566596Political women like this, left or right, aren't taken seriously because so many of their opinions are based on "i want men to take control but i don't wanna say it out loud and look ineffectual, tee hee" and it's getting more and more transparent. Their takes have no traction because of this, so the wheels just spin in the mud over and over, year after year.
>>25566596Sex and Character by Weininger
>>25566596Tbf we are only 2 decades into this century, and respect for literature and literacy has been steadily declining since the 80s, at least.
>>25566596browsing lolcow dot farm for a month
i'll bump this thread with the hope that it doesn't die by tomorrow when I should be eager enough to engage with it>>25566688positively tranny response. remarkable how easy it easy to clock them
>>25567829>The Thiel hate is so forced. No one can point to a talk of his etc and make a coherent argument for why they dislike himYou shouldn't hate Thiel for what he says, but for what he does.With that in mind, that interview he gave with the NYT where he got caught in his own retarded logic and essentially was shown that according to his own logic his actions would help the antichrist rather than oppose him will always be very funny to me.
Has a women ever been self aware enough for long enough to do a real analysis of women while bypassing her inbuilt filter to not be a "bad person"
Verging on Boomer humor, but I still like it.
>ummm actually being evil is actually le goodoh so doing something evil like murdering thiel in the streets would actually be le good, then? good to know. oops, sorry...EVIL to know. my bad. im new at this.
>armenianYou know we’re fucked when that sandy shithole in the middle east is the only place you’ll ever get some common sense from a fem*le
>25567829>200 shekels deposited
>>25568368There has to have been in the same way that every now and then you get a black person or latino that realizes how fucked up their culture is. I’m pretty sure there’s some woman poet or writer who was autistic and was actually honest about women.
>>25566596It's hard to take twitter personalities seriously. They have more in common with south park characters than anything else.
>>25567804>you can tell a part of her brain has been hijacked by mind virus buzzwords and it's holding her back.Can you give two examples?>>25568160They always use the same "oh this is so boring, I've seen this so many times before, don't actually engage with it just take my dismissal as gospel" tactic.
>>25568417It happens all the time but they are instantly drowned out or outright deplatformed in the post-sexual-revolution age.
>>25568503>two exampleslooksmaxxing and pickme. yes, i've heard and seen her use these terms and similar terms in other places, i used to watch red scare a lot for like one month
>>25566596Is her podcast as insightful as this?
>>25568550yes
>>25568516Every time I briefly make a twitter account, my elitism is vindicated. Thousands and thousands of subhuman retards talking about Current Thing using the same new buzzwords.But I have to say, despite the buzzwords her comments are at least somewhat more original than the majority of social media posters, or at least shes copying someone more original. And its only natural that a podcaster on modern social issues/politics would be forced to adopt modern slang, although personally I don't think "looksmax" is a modern phenomenon or that its even that accurate of a term.
>>25568585She's a 100 IQ fish swimming in 70 IQ waters. You don't get participation trophies for doing that.
>>25566596A few interesting points here, but there are also some flawed ones. >Women will... get pissed on... but throw people in jail over shitposts...To clarify, it is never the women who throw people in jail; think, who throws them in jail on women's behalf? Regardless of that detail, the argument is not really substantial; even if the same woman does both of these things, it's not necessarily contradictory. It's finding two extreme examples of women and using that to paint a picture of all women in general. Most women I have known (on friendly and/or sexual terms):a) Don't report social media posts to the authorities; andb) Have not been pissed on, at least not by strangers.>90% of this is letting *women* on the computer.Wrong again. Blaming women because men behave like retards around women misses half of the equation. It also misses the target entirely. People, in general, are malleable. They have been conditioned to think reactively, because that's what retains attention. She seems to be making the argument that debate should be focussed on the facts, but debate has always been driven by emotions; objectivity is a pretense. The issue isn't a rise in "emotionalism," because we've always had that; what we're seeing now is a streamlined process of using signs and symbols to elicit an emotional response that will work in favour of the established power. More insidiously, "debates" have been hijacked by these powers to leave us squabbling over matters of little recourse. E.g. consider how 'interesting' it is to debate gay marriage vs. debating the building of a new railway line instead of another lane of highway; it makes no tangible impact to most people's lives whether gay marriage is legal, whereas a new railway line would help potentially thousands of people get to work without relying on cars. At the same time, the legalisation of gay marriage would not affect the coffers of those in power, but public rail would affect car lobbyists who depend on us depending on cars. To answer your question, the last psychiatrist had some good blogposts back in the day.
>>25566596I've never listened to a single episode of Red Scare but she seems based. A lot of what she's posting seems to describe the impression I got of the blonde one though.
>>25568505Wrought over-correction by an establishment who thinks its wrong to punch down sometimes
>>25567687"Oh I've definitely been controlled and manipulated by woman kind" said an infant or a mentally handicapped guy or something.Like you read that and it struck a chord with you instead of just seeming ridiculous? I get the frustration of them having what you want and not sharing it as you would have it shared, but they aren't members of a guild of covert manipulators. Most of them are lazy, even.
>>25566596The Hole is a good one for Japanese female psychology in particular imo. Not so relevant for understanding non-Japanese women though.
>>25567736>le thiel boogeymanWomen have agency. Narrative controlling faggots like you are more misogynistic than anyone.
Blood Relations by Chris Knight. It's a marxist, feminist account of the role of the female picket strategy in the evolution of homo sapiens. Despite being written by a leftoid it's analysis is very close to the Dashboardian blackpill, but with reversed moral valence. Its scope is very broad but one important takeaway is that the female picket strategy is antithetical to the kinship structure the West is built on.
It's more important to learn child psychology, because children (both boys and girls) are the future, women are already adults (usually useful idiots for popular causes)
>>25568942You've never read it, have you?
>>25566596words words words
This just a stealth red scare promotion thread. 4chan really is just grifters, bots and jeets. Don't even know why I bother.
>>25568160Anna?
