>>25584404
I'm trying, but nobody here wants to read it.

wanna bet it turns out to be chatgpt slop later

Most classics were written either to get serialized and make a ton of money or to push the authors questionable politics onto a wider audience

>>25584426
Just a baseless statement with very little thought put behind it.

>>25584418
What are you writing?

>>25584569
this website in a nutshell brother

>>25584404
IF (YÓÚ) GAVE A SHIT ABOUT BOOKS YOU WOULD BE WRITING YOUR OPINIONS IN A BOOK

BUT YOU DIDN'T, YOU TYPED THEM ON THE COMPUTER

WHICH MAKES ME TO QUESTION WHETHER YÓÚ GIVE A SHIT ABOUT BOOKS

MY OWN ANSWER TO MY OWN QUESTION IS:

NO.

>>25584404
IF YOU GAVE A SHIT ABOUT SHITTING, YOU WOULD BE MAKING SURE THAT YOU WOULD PROVIDE THE WORLD WITH ENOUGH SHIT TO LIVE ON

WHEN YOU ARE CONCERNED WITH AUTHORING, YOUR MAIN CONCERN IS TO AUTHOR, IN WHICHEVER MEDIUM

WHEN YOU ARE CONCERNED WITH WRITING BOOKS, YOU WOULD BE WRITING BOOKS, BECAUSE THAT IS WHAT YOU ARE CONCERNED WITH

YOU ARE MAKING A GRAMMATICAL LOGICAL-PRAGMATIC ERROR IN YOUR REASONING IN YOUR ORIGINAL POSTING TITLE

HOWEVER, I WILL SET SOME SHIT STRAIGHT FOR YOU, BECAUSE, YOU KNOW, WE ARE BOTH LOSERS ON THIS SHITTY FORUM

YOU! YES, YOU!

DO YOU WANT TO READ? THEN READ

DO YOU WANT TO AUTHOR? THEN AUTHOR

DO YOU WANT TO WRITE ON PAPER? THEN WRITE ON PAPER

DO YOU WANT TO READ HANDWRITTEN MANUSCRIPTS? THEN READ HANDWRITTEN MANUSCRIPTS

DO YOU WANT TO COMPLAIN ON AN ANONYMOUS LITERATURE FORUM? THEN COMPLAIN ON AN ANONYMOUS LITERATURE FORUM

DO YOU WANT TO HAVE SEX? THEN GO FORTH AND HAVE SEX (I SUGGEST YOU BEGIN PRACTICING WITH CONDOMS)

DO YOU WANT TO BE A GARDENER? THEN GO GARDEN

DO YOU WANT TO BE RECTIFIED? THEN BE RECTIFIED

>>25584404
Some writers are guilty of this, but I don't really think its a vast majority.

>>25584423
>Nigerian name
high odds

Can you blame them? Working for a living sucks.
>>25584426
This.

>>25584404
These are contemporary authors anon we havent had modern writers in over 100 years