Book from the 1800s using AI coded writing, what's going on here?
>>25587437That's not one of the AI tellsThey usually go>it's not only X, but also Y
In that startling moment OP was confused, not by the words used but by the way the words were arranged.
>>25587437IN THE 1800S LITERATURE WAS STILL CONSIDERED ARTHENCE WE COULD APPLY ART-IFICIAL INTELLIGENCE TO ITWHAT IS GOING ON IS, AND I PUT FORTH TWO PERSPECTIVES:FROM THE VIEW OF THE ELECT: DEFLATION OF LITERATURE AS AN ART FORM BECAUSE OF ITS WIDER AVAILABILITY TO THE MASSES AND THE LOSS OF QUALITY BECAUSE MORE PEOPLE ARE PRACTICING NOW, AND NOT EVERYONE IS JUST AS GOOD - WHICH WILL BE FINE, BECAUSE WE HAD TO LEARN IT AT SOME POINT TOOFROM THE VIEW OF THE MASSES: BEING UPLIFTED BY ART INTO THE WORLD OF LITERATURE, AND THE ARTY AND LITERARY EXPERIMENTATION INHERENT TO THAT UPLIFTING - WHICH IS FINE, BECAUSE THEY'LL GAIN KNOWLEDGE ON A SYSTEM THAT THEY CAN WORK IN, AND THAT WORKS FOR THEM, AND NOT BE SPIRITUALLY POORTHAT'S WHAT'S GOING ON, IN MY BLASÉ OPINION
People who seethe over AI are going to become increasingly psychotic thinking they're seeing AI in every new book they read even when it's really just paranoia. Books have always had shitty awkward prose showing up here and there.
>>25587437Gods I hate you retarded faggots.What's happening is that AI is being trained on existing literature. Existing literature have some commonalities. Those commonalities will be identified as a pattern by the AI, so the AI will use it to generate text. When the AI is asked if a text segment is AI generated, it will look for patterns that itself and other AI's often use, and since their training data is actual manuscripts, they will flag common ways of writing as AI, forcing you as a writer to write outside the beaten path in order to not be flagged as someone using AI.The whole thing is retarded and would be easy to undo if it wasn't for 47-chromosomed half humans like you being unable to figure things out on your own.
>>25587709I can't wait.
>>25587445IDEALLY THEY SHÓÚLD ACCORDING TO THE FOLLOWING:>IT'S NOT ONLYA, B, C, >BUT ALSO D, E, F, G, H, I, J, K, L, M, N, O, P, Q, R, S, T, U, V, W, X, Y, Z.
>>25588163>SELF-CORRECTION:>IDEALLY THEY SHOULD GO ACCORDING TO THE FOLLOWING:
>>25588125Thanks, Captain Obvious
>>25587437Books didn't exist that long ago retard
>>25587437Seeing people describe any and all text as AI-coded has demonstrated to me that people have no skills whatsoever at deciphering writing
>>25588984>>25587709You aren't human.
