>send book to prestigious literary contest>the most prestigious in my country, in fact>judges are editors and publishers and agents>even if you don't win they still send you an evaluation sheet with a detailed analysis>wait close to a year for the result>no prize but here's your evaluation>3 pages of compliments>satisfaction gives way to suspicion by page 2>feed it to some AI detectors>all of them say that it's mostly AI generated, percentages vary from 45% to 100%>even Pangram, supposedly the most accurate, says that 47% is certainly AI generated>in fact, the only part written by a human is a needless summary of the plot and the final greetingsThis industry has been dead for a while, now it's putrefying.
>>25587539ror, rmao
>>25587539If it makes you feel any better they used AI to pick the winner too, so it's not all praises
>my country>implying it's not America>implying it's not a white countryWhat did you expect from brown people? You're brown yourself. You know how much your people love AI.
>>25587539Further info:It was the Calvino Awards (Premio Calvino). It's the most prestigious literary contest in Italy that admits new authors, and it's not particularly close. It's the contest everyone suggests when you're an unpublished author trying to get noticed by publishing houses and agents. And even they fell to the ultimate temptation. There is truly no hope left. What wasn't done by the turboleftist diverse monster-porn reading crowd was done by AI. This time it's over for good.>inb4 post the sheetIt's in italian and it would inevitably identify me.Also, a short story (Geometria dell'abbandono) recently won the Short Story section of the Premio Calvino, and every AI detector shows it as almost certainly AI generated.Which checks out, because it reads like absolute garbage.>>25587575Why are you replying? I'm too white to tickle your cuck fetish.
AI detectors don't work.
>>25587643I mean italians are just a bunch of low-moral thugs. Like, why do think mafia is a thing? You see it in other fields too, science, math, engineering, business, politics. No integrity whatsoever.
>>25587673They've actually gotten fairly reliable.
>>25587686Italy (like France and Germany) used to have a rich publishing culture you amerikikes could only dream of
>>25587783Post one that is accurate. I wanna try it.
Not to brag, but I submitted a pretty short chapter from my novel draft and it gave me 100% human written.
I'm an Archaism enjoyer and my texts are always 90%+ human; I'm pretty sure AI detection relies on style.
>>25588024My AI translations always come out as 100% human.
>>25587882Seriously? How'd you trick the detector??
>>25587881https://www.pangram.com/This is the one that uncovered that nigger's plagiarism case a while ago. The haitian one who was the favorite in some major literary prize.
>>25587539ROOKIE MISTAKE TO LET AN ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENT PROGRAM DETECT WHETHER YOU RECEIVED TEXTS WRITTEN BY ONE OF THE ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENT PROGRAM'S OWN KINDAS LONG AS YÓÚ FEEL THAT YOU ARE NOT CHEATING ON YOUR HOMEWORK, YOU CAN SAFELY HAVE A 'FUCK THE REST' EMOTIONALSO, THAT O.P. READS LIKE A GOOD LESSON ON THE UNIMPORTANCE OF EXTERNAL VALIDATION TO FEED YOUR - I ASSUME - TROLLY AND INSECURE EGO OR EGAWHETHER YOU ARE OR NOT, YOU'LL JUST GAIN SOCIAL CREDITS FOR WHATEVER YOU DID DO, NOT FOR WHAT YOU DIDN'T DOIF YOU WANT TO KEEP AT BEING A WRITER, JUST KEEP WRITINGIT'S THÁT EASY
>>25587539ALSO, 53% HUMAN IS STILL A MAJORITYJUST DO WHATEVER YOU'RE DOING TO YOUR MACHINE UP UNTIL IT IS 100% HUMAN, BECAUSE YOUR OWN 100% + THE MACHINE'S 100% = 200% = 2, ANDTHAT'S A PARTYCONTINUING FROM THERE UP UNTIL THE MACHINE IS 200% HUMAN, OR FETCH ANOTHER MACHINE, THEN DO 2X100%, BECAUSE 3 IS A CROWDTHEN BECAUSE YOU'RE AT IT SO NICELY, WHY NOT MAKE AN AFTERPARTY? FETCH ANOTHER MACHINE, HUMANIZE THAT ONE TO 100%,NOW YOU HAVE 400% HUMANNESSIN THE 1950-1960S FILM 'THE WIZARD OF OZ', THE TIN MAN WANTS A REAL HEART! IT IS UP TO YOU TO WORK FOR YOUR TIN MACHINE FOR WHAT IT NEEDS AND WANTS.
>>25588266that is a fattie poopjeet trolling shitdoesn't even know how to use 4chan
>>25588298>>25588311please start using a tripcode so I can filter all your shit posts automatically
So do they work now?
>>25588509I checked, they don't work, at all. They only work in a specific case where they red flag it if its over 60% or so, that it might be A.I.
The author has been killed by the machine.
>>25587539
>>25587575>america>white countrysince when?
>>25588509https://www.pangram.com/research/model-card/pangram-4One false positive every 24k tests. Seems reliable enough.>>25588512What indian coded bullshit detector did you try? Post some evidence.
