What am I in for?
>>25587662You're in for a good time (murder)
if you've seen the movie it's honestly kinda basically the same honestly
>>25587697Eh, the movie omits the edgier, and sometimes funnier content.
>>25587667(You better have misspelled marduk ;)READ about "Marduk" :https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marduk_(disambiguation)
>>25587714
>>25587697Not really, Bateman doesn't behave like an autistic weirdo like in the movie. The book's sexual violence is also much edgier than in the movie.
>>25587716Read the "subtitles".Go read again in "context" you hasty man.We appreciate only attaching an image and not using lower case letter at the start of the sentence in your reply.
>>25587662He writes the way women think but still manages to make it an enjoyable experience.
>>25587697Sameish humour yes but other that not really the same at all. And I will never forgive the movie for not including the best chapter (The christmas party)
>>25587662faggy amarrican discourse from the 80s
>>25587662You're in for a great book.
>>25587662retarded slop
>>25587662le hip to be square man
pages and pages of what people are wearing, ties, shirts, pants, blouses, glasses, watches, scarfs, shoes, socks, hats, purses, dresses, jackets for hundreds of pages.
>>25587662Really funny and occasionally disturbing satire that’s about twice as long as it needed to be. It feeling repetitive is probably intentional but that doesn’t make the repetition fun.
>>25587662written excrement
>>25587662A step above pulp
fantastic80s vibesepic memescrazy action packed scenessatirebig businessu2 and phil collins
>>25587662A narcissist that doesn't realize he's a narcissist writes about a narcissist that does realize he's narcissist. Same as every Bret Easton Baldspot book, this one just has a serial killer spin.
