Do any philosophical anti-anime books exist that point out the inherent degenerate, morally bankrupt nature of the medium?
No. But I wish.
>>25590446Schopenhauer is more on the pro-anime side I think, so you might want to avoid his theory of art.
>>25590457Him and Hegel, tranime trannies love Hegel
>>25590446That's what posting is for. The subject doesn't merit a book, it's obvious there's something wrong with it.
>>25590446Nobody who could write anything convincing gives a shit about anime
>>25590446Rousseau's Discourse on the Arts and Sciences
Try using your brain for once, retard
>>25590446>hey guys are there any books out there that reinforce my pre-existing biases?I don’t even like anime but I’m definitely sick of this dumbass thread format.
>>25590446Do you really need a book for that? Isn't it obvious?
ITT: tourist shitstains cope with their insecurity over having to post on an anime website
>25590784>25590787>25590813>still cant breed
>>25590446Bud, do you know where you are?
>>25590446Anyone with a brain would pursue the better argument that anime is an aesthetic abomination instead of moralfagging about cartoons
>>25591151How can you argue for ugliness? It is just so. It is uncontroversial that Burke's project was a failure.
>>25591166"the beautiful has but one type; the ugly has a thousand."
Sure are a lot of butthurt eternal virgins obsessed with gook toons ITT.
>>25591270You'd think they had better things to complain about.
>>25591206>the internet's culture laboratoryReddit's never come up with an original thing in its life, everything they've done they've stolen from other websites, mostly here and Twitter.
>>25591178Sadly too often misused quote.
>>25590446You could try to use your knowledge of the craft and ideological inclinations to write a mediocre yet halfway compelling 4 hour video essay and post it on youtube so other similarly inclined fags can take a shit to it as background noise.
>>25591206
>>25591388How am I gonna take a four hour shit?
Reverend Insanity
>>25591319No wonder. It's in a different language.
>>25591810( Wonder the meaning ;)
>>25590446Be the change you want to see in the world. Write it.
>>25590446YES.
>>25590460Hegel cannot even correctly account for any post-industrial mass produced art, let alone anime which is only a recent development. His world was that of travelling in order to visit museums and assisting concertos to listen to musical pieces.To answer tard OP >>25590446 there are no books that talk about this because theoretical speculation on aesthetics was denigrated by the Amerigoy ZOG-cattle military-industrial complex society's ideology which has no appreciation for any penetrating thought about art. It is also the case that the "art" itself suffers from this goyimfication of the Modern World.
>>25590446If they do exist I hope to read them if they don't that's free real estate90% of anime are trash and of the 10% remaining 99% of that isnt mid
>>25592093I watched "Prince of Mononoke" it was heart moving and thought provoking also the animation was colorful and well drawn.In summary, it was about humans that got in conflict with the environment (by a way or another) and each others, while some kind of a hero through reconciliation with nature's spirit incarnated in form of an animal, the war ended between all and nature recuperated and peace prevailed :)
>>25590457Yes, basically there is nothing in his theory that would exclude an otaku from changing his consciousness into a detached, contemplative mode of aesthetic deliverance liberated from profane every-day personal ego-identification when watching Neon Genesis Evangelion.
>>25590446>nooo!! You can’t look at that! It’s degenerate and corruptive!ok then make something more captivating?
>>25591006do you? you could always go back, you know.
