He's rolling in his grave knowing liberal thinkers gave up defending his ideas.
>>25596064>He's rolling in his graveShould be able to falsify this claim.
poor tolkein
>>25596064How have they given it up?
>>25596064Good. He deserves to be raped for the paradox of tolerance nonsense by itself. My father used to say that Heaven has clouds for a floor but Hell's ceiling is made of glass, and by this he meant that all one needs to torture a cuckold like Popper is to let him see what became of his world after his death.I wish for Hell to exist just so that I might know he is there, seething that his shitcolored nonsense faggotry had ZERO effect in improving the world, and in fact, he helped to arm the very people whom he hated most. He is a rape victim, a shitmouth, a cuckold pig and a pissdrinker, and his every moment of the afterlife should feel to him like having a baselard slid up his ass. Jewish filth. Nationalism Won and I'd rather Communism get second place than let Liberal pigs continue to exist. TOTAL annihiltion of tolerance conceptually. The Murder of the egalitarian God. Butcher them down to their foundations and compress their ashes into diamond shrapnel for bombs, and drop those bombs on shitskin children.
>>25596272thank you schizoanon
>>25596064I recently said Derrida in another thread, but this kike is also way up there in terms of how his own preoccupation of being a jew completely upended any substantial philosophical claim of his own. sad because he very much was a good thinker in theory
popper? i barely know her!
>>25596064This fraud was one of the first to make anti conspiracy realism arguments go mainstream. Thanks for laundering legitimacy for the crime syndicate running your so called open society.
>>25596272you're giving popper too much credit for being anything beyond a tribal bagman
>>25596064The essence of Popper’s thought is the paradox of tolerance: how can we, while being tolerant, tolerate intolerance?If Popper had a bit more common sense, he would have admitted that this is a logical impossibility. This is because tolerance is not an absolute state. In the real world, we accept those who are like us and tolerate those who are at least somewhat bearable; the rest cannot be tolerated. End of story.His entire body of social thought is rooted in a kind of impossible, wishfulthinking, logical autism. His only genuine achievement in the realm of logic was the recognition that every intellectual process is a deduction, and that true induction does not exist.
>>25596272kek youre why the paradox of tolerance existsget fucked asshole>muh daddy said hell and da liberals wear glass to see each others peepees agh the JEWS
>>25596918>was the recognition that every intellectual process is a deduction, and that true induction does not exist.Aristotle already pointed this out in the Prior Analytics. He examines in detail the deductive logic that underlies induction and its peculiarities.
>>25596946lmao
>>25596961I am not as familiar with Aristotle’s logical works as you are, so I cannot comment on that; my point, however, was that the entirety of modern logic has been driven by a desire to somehow circumvent its own limitations. It is often forgotten that the early 20th century was a period marked by peculiar attempts to devise alternative systems of logic and mathematics, so it is to Popper’s credit that he pointed out the obvious. Given his intellectual capabilities, if he not been so religiously fascinated by democracy, he would have been well-equipped to subject it to a rational critique.
>>25596946Why would I get fucked? My side is winning. Liberalism is already a raped husk of its former self. The "paradox of tolerance" was the first nail in the coffin, an explicit admission that the virtue of intolerance is actually a fiction.You have already joined Popper among the unesteemed and disgraced ranks of THE RAPED, and there is no escape.
>>25596499There has never been a single "philosopher" of jewish descent whose entire "philosophy" does not boil down to some sort of complex about their jewishness generalized onto reality and non-jews as a whole, always coming in a pair with a very generous serving of arguing in bad faith.
>>25596918>The essence of Popper’s thought is the paradox of tolerance:PoT is just some literal footnote from one of his books, not the essence of his thought. It only became the key idea associated with him because some redditor made a viral anti-Drumpf comic about it in like 2016
The rapid* “self”-replication of the virtuous, so that vices dissolve sooner and virtues prevail throughout the “all.”
>>25598257It is his most popular idea, hence it is the essence of his thought. The reader is the real author of a work because of the act of interpretation being at the center of everything that has to do with texts.
>>25598417It may be the essence of Popper’s thought in the eyes of a social media user in 2026 but it's not an idea Popper spent his life developing
>>25598425What Popper said or thought is irrelevant. What is relevant is what people make of him.This is also true for any other philosopher.
