can you name all these people on the chart anon?

>>25596541
from top left to bottom right:
Crowley, McKenna, Ungern-Sternberg, Reghini
Aquino, Iamblichus, Kaczynski, Teichmüller,
Fort, Schelling, Plato, Ramsey,
Fukuoka, Jünger, Lao Zi, Poincaré,
Churchland (the husband), Hayek, Virgil, Dumézil,
Dawkins, Zola, Kant, Lévy

You could have used google images though

Whether or not a writer is intelligent certainly depends on the fluid verbal intellect and the preexisting mental schemata of the reader. The designation of x writer as 'intelligent' is almost always a reflection of the reader's own consciousness and perception in that moment. The richness of the writing is determined by the richness of your thought. For example, many people pile on the bandwagon of hating Hegel for being le obscurantist schizomaxxing blud and equate reading his books to going insane, when that isnt the truth and they only take those positions because they dont understand him (because they're, more often than not, kinda retarded).

Ramsey should be on very left.

Dawkins is below 100 IQ.

Also, chart was written by Anglo, who never read Kant and see him as some kind of Descartes

>>25596492
DID THE WRITER OR WRITESTER COMPLETE HIS OR HER NOTEBOOK 100%?

YES? -> 100% A WRITER + WRITESTER
NO? -> [PERCENTAGE OF NOTEBOOK FILLED]% A WRITER + WRITESTER

YÉS YÉS, WE MAY CUMULATIVATE!