Great. Now I have to throw out my Borges collection. Nabokov is better anyway.
>>25599669Never thought to compare the two but Borges is better than Nabokov. And he's not even trying, which makes it uglier.>borgesi didnt finish ulysses but it's a masterpiece>nabokovhurr here's a whole class but i'm going to skip over the complex chapters
Nabokov is an illuminati coded pos fraud. You're telling me the guy who coined the whole loli thing wasn't a high ranking pedophile? Give me a break
>>25599680>You're telling me the guy who coined the whole loli thing wasn't a high ranking pedophile?Yes. Nabokov actually despised the pedo character he created. That's why he wrote the wholesome Pnin, as a way of having a break from that weasel Humbert Humbert.Lolita is really more about the stagnant, old europe falling for the young, vital and vulgar but charming young america
I hate hearing about fucking Nabokov! No, I didn’t take any of his criticisms of my favorite writers seriously. I have met many sensitive murders and soulful prostitute. Nabokov is for juvenile readers wishing to seem literate.
>>25599669>You can't say anything against negroes. The only merit they have is that they've been mistreated This is true btw Borges is much better than Nabokov. They don't have much in common except being broadly "metafictional". Borges is a fabulist and Nabokov is a novelist, among fabulists Borges is first rate and among novelists Nabokov is good but second rate. Borges is also a much better literary critic than Nabokov: essays like Kafka and his Precursors or The Wall and the Books are some of the best literary theory ever written.
>>25599669>anti-black-people quote that manages to reference George Bernard ShawHow patrician is this? I kneel.
>>25599701>its all le allegory guys, I'm not pushing pedophilia, I promise
>>25599893Prove that he was a pedo, buster.
>>25599669Lolita is slightly better than ficciones and aleph.
>>25599911His work Lolita pushed pedophilia into the public discourse and in honor of him even Japanese pedos forever reference it when talking about underage girls
>>25599918>nabokov is just basedwe know anon
>>25599935And there it is, tacit admission he was an illuminati agent like most "artists"
>>25599918I'm still waiting for the proofs that he was a actual, liteal pedo HIMSELF and that he DELIBERATELY pushed pedophilia because he WAS one
>>25599669>The only merit they have is that they've been mistreated, and as Bernard Shaw observed, that's no merit.This is an absolute banger of a line. It's completely true. Other than being the literal slaves of various other races, what merit do dark-skinned people classically have? All heavily-Black areas of any given country are a shithole, and huge swaths of Africa are shitholes, too.
>>25599960They are undeniably great at making music.
>>25599960>what merit do dark-skinned people classically haveSubstantially overrepresentedn in American pornography as actors.
>>25599669Borges liked to say things. You could probably collect a giant pile of sayings of his shitting on just about everything except the English, whom he unconditionally loved because Argentine.Borges was more enjoyable than Nabokov, desu. But this may be because of cultural affinity.>>25599701Galkovskian interpretation. Teebeeich.
>>25599946why are you acting like promoting it is ok
>>25600047Because he's a pornbrained atheoid who makes ai porn all the time
>>25600018And really. Borges had questionable taste in English literature, imo. Really fitting name, really. They made the most bourgeois man ever and named him George Bougie.
>>25600067Literally George Louis Bourgeois. Nominative determinism.
