What are the best right wing novels dealing with demographic change? Like Camp of the Saints
>>25632248you could write one that is just angry Twitter posts.
extremely sad video man
it's fucking over for civilization damn man
>>25632248>Heh heh hehhhhh>I'm'a get so manneh CLIQS! WIT DIS! >Wheeeezzz>Camp of the SaintsYou know the Epstein class is putting this one into production IN LIVE ACTION? Just for you? You out there enjoying the ride, brow? I mean you like that book, right?There it is! In real-time interactive, man!
A Better Life
>>25632340>Gloria's 26-year-old underemployed son, Nico, who still lives at home, is intensely skeptical. As Martine's suspicious acquaintances begin appearing, Nico grows increasingly hostile toward the arrangement and the broader migrant crisis, developing into an unreliable narrator with an aggressive, opposing perspective.It sounds more like something trying to paint an unflattering image of neet racists, no?
>>25632319>Epstein classI love how any time the bottom 1% acts like a bunch of trash, you faggots just ignore it, deflect and bring up the "Epstein class." And then I remember how pre-2017 the idea of "elites" engaging in secret sex trafficking with government/intelligence agency involvement was a far-right schizo conspiracy theory. no one who seriously uses the term "Epstein class" gave half a shit about it until trump got reelected, super cool.
>>25632504You are an embarrassing parody of a functioning human being.
>>25632509>an embarrassing parody of a functioning human being.It’s kind of funny that you’d call him that in defense of the behavior displayed in that OP webm
>>25632504It's the newest, and I must say cleverest yet way to deflect the concept of the 1% away from Jewish nepotism. We've had the elites, the bankers, the globalists, now we have a term that even has an Israeli Jew's name in it, yet is framed by the term "class", carrying in context a Marxist connotation, which despite Marx also being Jewish redirects the term away from either Epstein or Marx's ethnic group entirely and towards a previously engineered concept of 'rich white men.' This kind of thing is part of the reason why literacy standards have been allowed to decline precipitously.
>>25632248Souris by me
>>25632319Why do leftoids think calling people who don't want billions of niggers in their neighborhoods Epstein associates? >you must be Jewish if you don't want enrichment!
low iq thread
high iq thread
Das right das MY candy now fuck Timmy gon do
>>25632596I thought this meme might die after a surveillance video surfaced around the same time of a black who got shot dead, point blank, after harassing a 'timmy' and his white gf. Wish I had the webm saved so I could spam it now, alas.
>>25632603Shiiiiiit
>>25632248>Camp of the Saintsit wasnt about demographic change, it was about how french society had been so atomized that there couldnt be any coherent response to a crisis
>poor people are more likely to steal and vandalize>this is completely surprising behaviormany such cases
>Camp of the SaintsUtter horseshit.
Has anyone noticed overall trend of releasing these videos of kids on Halloween? Not just green text, but actual videos. I cannot tell how anonymous they are, but here the thing - people talk how the fear of being recorded and posted online has tamed the youngsters to maybe an unnecessary degree, yet now adults kinda re-iterate that shit. My point being: if you want to police the antisocial behaviors - which is fair, not defending that in a slightest - do it by yelling at kids in analog way, then come to green text here.
>>25632583They genuinely have nothing to say and no relationship with reality. They think the mass population replacement is just chuds getting mad at seeing a brown person on tv, and thus a dog and pony show to distract us so we don't rise up and do communism. Communists are people entirely buried in theory and disconnected from actual reality.
>>25633036The top 1% of the wealth bracket of black americans have a higher violent crime rate and higher homicide rate than the bottom 30% of the wealth bracket of white americans.
>liberal posts raw footage of the president saying something stupid>(you): That's edited! It's out of context!>also (you): >>25632248
>>25632382>sounds more like something trying to paint an unflattering image of neet racistsThe author takes the piss out of most characters in the book, some of the lines she writes about the liberal mom are quite biting.
>>25632504I remember Republicans seething and coping anytime you brought up the Franklin Scandal
>>25632248This video is a perfect example of the cause of the crisis. Lazy homeowner is unwilling to put in the absolute bare minimum effort of getting up, opening the door and handing out candy. He relies on an honor system which instantly collapses when challenged. Likewise the West fell because Westerners were unwilling to put the work in to maintain their civilization.
>>25632248The best thing is to get out the house and live in the real world instead of hiding away inside staring at a screen
>>25633469You must have a long memory. Where was that? the National Review in the 90s? I can't imagine any polchud defending rino pederasts
>>25633485Oh, I guess it's not not happening then!Lefties on here pretending to be anti semites, when they're not, just so they can use it as a weapon against the chuds, has become so tiresome. There's really no level of dishonesty leftists won't immediately jump at
>>25633315The clever propaganda abounds… Stay frosty, never let racists win
>>25632248Camp of the Saints is unreadably bad unfortunately. I tried multiple times to start it and just couldn’t force myself to do it
>>25633531No, this is just jews brainwashing you. You hate jews right? If I call this jewish will that make you renounce it? help me out xisters I can't think of anything else
>>25632319can't refute the evidence though
>>25632248Apparently Victor Hugo wrote a novel about the Haitian Revolution, it might be similar to Camp of the Saints
>>25632382Nico is sympathetically written and ultimately proven correct, as are most of Lionel's chud characters
>>25632509>generic insult that doesn't address anything anon saysYou are boring
>>25633315lol what do you think the video is editing out?
>>25632282That's pretty much what Camp of the saints is.
>>25633282Can you back up this claim?
>>25635198being "correct" as a right winger when you lose your country isn't really a good thing
>>25635197Caesar was wildly progressive, though.
>>25635264okay but we're talking about the portrayal of a character in a book right now
>>25635198Alright thanks, I’ll check it out
>>25632382The authors a chud
>>25632248The Germanic peoples did not inhabit cities; they detested living in them and, consequently, held their inhabitants in low regard. Nevertheless, they did not destroy the cities that fell under their control through conquest. In the second century of our era, Ptolemy still enumerated ninety-four major urban centers between the Rhine and the Baltic—ancient foundations established by the Gauls or the Slavs, and still occupied by them (1). In truth, under the rule of the conquerors from the North, these cities entered a period of decline. Created by the rudimentary culture of two mixed peoples—a culture that was narrowly utilitarian—they succumbed to two powerful, albeit indirect, consequences of the conquest they had endured. By enticing the indigenous youth to adopt their customs, and by inviting local warriors to join their expeditions—thereby sharing in their honors and spoils—the Germanic peoples quickly led the Celtic nobility to embrace their way of life. The latter, in turn, tended to become closely integrated with them. As for the merchant and industrial classes, who were more settled, the imperfection of their own goods made it difficult for them to compete with the products of Roman manufacturers. These Romans, having established themselves quite early along the *Agri Decumates* (the frontier region), supplied the Germanic peoples with Italian or Greek merchandise—goods that were far cheaper, or at the very least, infinitely more beautiful and of superior quality. Such is the twofold and enduring advantage of an advanced civilization. Reduced to copying Roman models to suit the tastes of their masters, local craftsmen could only hope to derive any real profit from their labor by entering the direct service of those who held estates and fiefs—men who naturally tended to gather around themselves, as part of their immediate following, everyone who might prove useful to them. In this way, the towns were gradually depopulated and dwindled into obscure, insignificant settlements.de Gobineau
>>25635270By ancient Roman standards. By today’s standards he would be farther right than me. All Romans were intensely prejudiced against everyone and everything.
>>25633531>>25632248Ring cameras are the gayest thing on planet earth. People are such pussies then put this shit online.When I was 12 I was dumpin buckets upon buckets of candy with no people there.Kids rock.
>>25635692The patriciate was fully aware of the harm that the constant influx of foreigners caused to its own influence, and it adopted as a fundamental principle the opposition to such additions whenever possible; the people, by contrast—equally alive to the gains in numbers, wealth, and knowledge that came from keeping the city’s gates wide open to newcomers—embraced the cause of these outsiders. Since these new arrivals, spurned by the nobility, had no other option but to join the ranks of the commoners, the people—the plebs—became the avowed champions of those from outside (1).Thus, there was no truly and exclusively national language; instead, there was an increasingly pronounced enthusiasm for the literature and ideas of Athens and Alexandria, for Hellenic schools and teachers, for Asian-style houses and Syrian furniture, and a profound disdain for local customs—this is what the city had become. Having begun under Etruscan domination and grown under a Sabine oligarchy, it was now approaching the era of a Semitic democracy.How little did we know indeed. Literally 2026, holy shit lmao.
>>25635502Shriver's great, she's like the only writer who has sympathetic chuddy characters. Mania's also a fun read in that vein
>>25635717The crowd, packed into the streets, surrendered itself entirely to the embrace of this elemental force. The age of free institutions and legality was drawing to a close. The era that followed was one of violent coups d’état, great massacres, profound perversions, and rampant debauchery. One might imagine oneself transported to Tyre in the days of its decline; and indeed—though on a larger geographical scale—the situation is much the same: a clash of the most diverse races, unable to blend, unable to dominate one another, unable to reach a compromise, and left with no choice but that between despotism and anarchy.I'm gonna read all the books, I said. I'm gonna be in the know.
>>25635692Maybe, but how could he be a good example to bring up against demographic change when he led non-citizen foreigners, whom he later granted citizenship, in his coup against the established Republican order, unless as an example of what OP presumably hates? That's not even to mention his support for the Jews (like so many Roman emperors), which this board, as full as it is with /pol/ tourists, would resent if they had read the history they claim to. Men like Caesar and Gracchus laid the foundations for Rome to become antiquity's cosmopolitan center.
>>25635729>which this board, as full as it is with /pol/ tourists, would resent if they had read the history they claim toYou know you're on /lit/ and not /his/ right
>>25635748Yes. I tried posting on /his/ a couple years ago but it was somehow even dumber than this place.
>>25635729I didn’t bring him up as an example of anything. I’ve read all of his diaries and the complete surviving writings of Cicero on top of countless other books about Rome. To my mind comparing Ancient Rome and ancient Roman’s to modern politics and people is retarded in general.
>>25635753Fair enough, though I don't see why you would have posted The Gallic War at all if not as some sort of example.
>>25635754Obviously because I didn’t post it
>>25635757oh
>>25633315You people tell anons to go back to /pol/, but you're the ones obsessed with mainstream politics and constantly shove it down everyone else's throat. It's crazy to me that you can care about US politics at all, are you an imbecile? No one cares, no one asked. You're no smarter or better informed than the septuagenarians watching cable TV all day like it's still the 1980s.
>>25635270>>25635729That's irrelevant to The Gallic War, which anon obviously posted tongue-in-cheek in reference to Caesar 'changing the demographics' of Gaul, forcibly, by his war against them, you fucking moron.
>>25635883The demographics of Gaul remained more or less the same, whereas Rome's were changed forever. Moreover, the "non-citizen foreigners" I mentioned were the very Gauls he had conquered.
>>25632534Outstanding post. Here be a right proper /lit/izen.
>>25632504The only reason these Democrat clowns are suddenly sniffing around the Epstein files is because they think they finally found something against Trump that will stick with his base (to their credit, sort of worked). They knew Russiagate and January 6 were irrelevant to Trump sympathizers, but Epstein was part of the whole Q shit, so that was the one thing they cared about where he was vulnerable. They treated the whole thing like Pizzagate before this term. They did not and do not give a flying fuck about "justice" or the victims. Friend/enemy distinction. Purely tactical. Politicians are all absolute filth, frankly.
>>25632596I'd wager Timmy got exactly what he wanted from his candy bait.
The Turner Diaries.
>>25632248>>25633531I like to busk when the weather is nice, my city's got a great scene for it. There have been exactly two times where someone just comes up and grabs money from my case ($5 bill each time). One kid, one adult. Guess what they had in common.
>>25636161huh
>>25636385God that would send me into a rage lol. I wouldn’t be able to handle myself
