This has some brilliance in it but it needed an editor. It also reads like two or three different people wrote it.
>>25634988he should've, like, mellowed out or something idk it kinda reads like seething
>>25635016Some parts include repetitive seething/blowing off steam. Some parts are coherent thoughts on ideology and state - individual relations that still hold up. It's weird.
>>25634988>This has some brilliance in itI failed to see it but nice digits nonetheless
>>25635016It's hard to mellow out when you're a sensitive young man
>>25634988Shalom!
>>25635120I'm being pro Hitler.>>25635053The bottom up view of a state, the Ideological mission for Germany based on the turn of the century anthropology, the pro /fit/ anti /fa/ passage etc
It read like the petulant, butthurt screeching of a sore loser who was mad at the world because it was unfair to me.
If he was so great why did he need to struggle??
>>25635180Only some parts
>>25635159>kids should do more PEWoa
>>25635120Yawn
>>25635713If by "only some parts" you mean well-over half of the book.
The right are really desperate to recoup their lost members. Just stop posting, it's pathetic.
>>25634988That's because it wasn't composed and edited deliberately, but was rather verbal rants Hitler gave when he was in jail for the beer hall putsch that an assistant wrote down and later published. For being completely stream of consciousness, it's really not that bad.
>>25634988that's because hitler was the sole writer of it
>>25636202wasn't*
>>25634988>It also reads like two or three different people wrote it.given adolf sourced some stuff from another book, yes
>>25636202shalom!
>>25634988This book is rather shocking. There is so much here that lucidly speaks to present day, that it's insane. This is the most lied about book ever. I just pulled this quote up at random, for instance. He's literally talking about DEI and schooling - a fucking century before it took off:>This state of affairs would become intolerable if a day should arrive when it no longer refers to exceptional cases. But the situation is already intolerable where talent and natural gifts are not taken as decisive factors in qualifying for the right to a higher education. It is indeed intolerable to think that year after year hundreds of thousands of young people without a single vestige of talent are deemed worthy of a higher education, while other hundreds of thousands who possess high natural gifts have to go without any sort of higher schooling at all. The practical loss thus caused to the nation is incalculable.
