There is no doubt in my mind that if born today, Nietzsche would be a Negrophile
Hang yourself, nigger
>>25638878There is no doubt in my mind that if 2+2=3, Nietzsche would be born today.
Either Nietzsche was born today or you're a bishop.
>>25638885Do you think we have any actual bishops posting here?I can honestly see Bishop Barron posting here. He's online enough. We know Bret Easton Ellis posts on here and he's a similarly terminally online boomer.
>>25638882When I think of the lightness of feet, the dancers versatility, the raucous laughter, the joyous and broad white teethed smile, the tact in aesthetics and biological vitality impervious to the bluntness and ugliness of nerdishness or logic, when I think of profound suffering and genius in suffering, I think of the American nigger as exemplary of everything that Nietzsche stood for.
He'd probably be an autist who's very xenophilic and enjoys posting about niche oriental history on forums no one's ever heard of.
>>25638917Nietzsche was great xenophile in his time, though unfortunately he had no experience with the American nigger, who his mentor Wagner sided by reason of pity, during his time. But Nietzsche would side with the negro not by reason of pity but by witnessing that in the Negro gangster and his representative, the Negro gangster poet (the “rapper”) the ideal of Cesare Borgia, for whom life was always é tutto festo, was brought back in the flesh somehow, somewaybwithin the suffocating miasma of 21st century feminist democracy. Additionally, Nietzsche had a most unautistic sense for rhythm which and would have won him over to the soul music of the American nigger anyway
>>25638928
>>25638882You're shitting up the board>>25638907so are youanyways you don't understand how raped these people are. this is stupid
>>25638878>>25638928Nietzsche was absolutely not a xenophile and he wasn't any kind of -phile really. He admired and criticized everyone; everyone has an attractive and an ugly side depending on the angle you're looking from. That's what perspectivism is all about.
>Extremely religious>Extremely conservative, no Pride flags in the continent >High birthratesWhat’s not to like about Africans? If we learned from them maybe the West wouldn’t be so cooked
>>25639418He was always oriented internationally. He named his book after Persia and always said how profound Hinduism was. He said he preferred Islam to Christianity and even when mentioning “blond beasts” he had to talk about Japanese and Arabian aristocracy
>>25638950Your the only raped person here, nigger
>>25638878he would be born in France then
>>25639577>He named his book after PersiaWhich book?The trick with Nietzsche is, whenever he's writing something positive about a thing, it's really in order to shed light on the negativity of another thing.
>>25638878Neetch today would be an obese troon reddit mod on r/atheism
>>25639669Zarathustra? I don’t think you’re qualified to comment on Nietzsche if you have to ask
>>25639669> whenever he's writing something positive about a thing, it's really in order to shed light on the negativity of another thingThis is true only insofar as its the structure of existence (tyrannizing of powers).
Why do you talk about this everyday?
>>25639711I had to ask because its name doesn't support the point you were making; it supports mine. His character Zarathustra espouses the opposite philosophy of the historical Zoroaster. As I said before, with Nietzsche, he's always making reference to something to shed light on its negativity.>>25639713I'm not sure how this comment relates to Nietzsche's writing.
What you describe is more of a Schopenhauerian or Christian mode, good as denial of will to life. A negative way of conceiving things is even is in what Goethe said of poetic inspiration coming from resistance to “evil” and having negative origin. There’s Its not a Nietzschean peculariarity though youre not wrong to see it in him - seeing it doesn't repudiate anything.>The mightiest man, the creator, would have to be the most evil, inasmuch as he makes his ideal prevail over all men in opposition to their ideals, and remoulds them according to his own image.
>>25639721>>25639715See >>25639730Youre being pedantic and frankly uninteresting. This thread is about nigger supremacy and dance music in light of Nietzschean aesthetics
>>25639579We're not talking about who is "here" idiot, we're talking about blacks, try to keep up. >>25639634What if he was the exact same guy in every way, but French? Would he have the same reputation?
>>25640802Impossible hypothetical - but I think he would hate French culture and be a Germanophile. French would have been an inferior language for him to write in
>>25638878If Nietzsche was alive today he'd take ine look at the mutted dystopian shithole that Germany has become and kill himself.
he'd be happy with a cute mulatto and he never would have written anything.
Nietzsche loved Pooplaks who are very nigger-coded, so true
>>25640850
>>25638878>Perhaps in those days (this is to solace the weaklings) pain did not hurt so much as it does nowadays: any physician who has treated negroes (granted that these are taken as representative of the prehistoric man) suffering from severe internal inflammations which would bring a European, even though he had the soundest constitution, almost to despair, would be in a position to come to this conclusion. Pain has not the same effect with negroes. (The curve of human sensibilities to pain seems indeed to sink in an extraordinary and almost sudden fashion, as soon as one has passed the upper ten thousand or ten millions of over-civilised humanity, and I personally have no doubt that, by comparison with one painful night passed by one single hysterical chit of a cultured woman, the suffering of all the animals taken together who have been put to the question of the knife, so as to give scientific answers, are simply negligible.)He basically thought that they were on the level of fauna, which to be fair would put them above most of (modern) humanity in his estimation, but also less capable of obtaining his ideal of the overman.
>>25642027Nietzsche also liked fauna so this is no repudiation to him liking Negroes. On the other hand Negroes are more impressive now than they were believed to be back then - for example, Gobineau bizzarely describes Negroes as much less athletic than whites. Nietzsche likely never met a Negro. It’s also just the kind of thing he would have done, praise and contrast the criminality of the Negro to the tame and bureaucratic European herd animal, incapable of any real passion.
And while that the Ubermensch should arise from out the black race, is hard to believe and even laughable, that there is any great difference in the white and black races, in their distance from the Ubermensch, is a dubious proposition. At this scale the white and black are comparable - only whites are more repulsive to me but that is only because I am “white”
