yeah.. and?

Most art rock is literally just theater kid nonsense lmao

>>130603747
Your loss for not understanding “theater kid” mindset. Jealous?

>>130603747
One day they'll call it proto-music.
Who can deny that the compositions of today's successful musical acts aren't levels above the work of the famous classical composers?

>>130603747
Most modern music is based on classical theory so what’s your point?

>>130603747
LMFAO, got 'em

>>130603747
Is this meant to be a diss? What does this even mean?
What makes music 'theater kid music' anyway?

>>130603878
Theater kid detected, lol

>>130603747
'fraid so

>>130603747
classicalcuckfagxirs...

>>130603747
I struggle to name music that is not theater kid nonsense

>>130604087
listen to more music

I can tell this was meant to be ragebait but unfortunately this board mostly consists of knuckledragging subhuman retards so this isn't a controversial statement

>>130603747
>theater kid nonsense
?

>>130604110
such as? even techno is theater kid nonsense

>>130603747
Low effort post, OP is a faggot.

puts on Mahler
LOOK, I'M A TREE
waves arms around
I'M A TREE, THESE ARE MY BRANCHES IN THE BREEEEEEEEEEZE
pulls ugly cry face

>>130604087
Reggaeton is not boring theater kid crap

>>130603878
Here comes the incel timmy with a tiny pasty cock to seethe all over the thread

>>130603747
Many rock musicians are theatre kids who tried their hand at making classical music. They were called "rock operas" and they were some of the worst and most embarrassing attempts ever made

>>130603747
Wrong. Terrible thread. OP is a fag. Etc.

>>130605098
Why are people on this website so obsessed with incels' penises?

I like classical music but I fucking LOATHE classical fags since their whole personality is acting like they're smarter than everyone because they listen to classical and watch fucking anime OVA's from the 80's they're a bunch of annoying over compensating nerds.

>>130603747
apart from the word "nonsense", which says nothing about the state of the entire genre, is this meant to be an insult or compliment?

>>130605559
>I experience intellectual insecurity and it makes me MAD

>>130605752
t. classical fag

>>130603747
you black or something?

>>130605049
yeah it's just regular boring

>>130605559
anyone that says "I like classical music but I hate classical fags" doesn't actually like classical and are only saying so to appear unbiased. At most they listen to like Fur Elise and one more piece and that's it.

>>130605559
The problem with /classical/tards is that they get filtered by anything modern aside from maybe serialism, and that's a big maybe

>>130605559
Ironically, a pretentious post. You're acting as if /mu/fags, rockfags, progfags, metalfags, etc. aren't exactly the same, kek. In any case, these are all minorities within their groups. The average classicalfag doesn't give a shit about what you're sperging about. Besides, classicalfags would actually prefer if everybody else listened to classical as well, then nobody could claim they're smarter than everyone else; see how that works? Nobody pretends to like anything, by the way.

>>130607809
The problem with your post is that it makes a lot of assumptions, just like >>130605559. I don't think I'm alone in saying that I don't get filtered by anything modern. I went through my /mu/core phase, trying to fit in and getting with the times, but I just realized classical is more interesting and appealing to my ears. If anything, the average listener gets filtered by classical.

>>130609662
>I don't get filtered by anything modern
>I went through my /mu/core phase
lmao. That's fine if you like classical everyone's taste is different but if you never get past /mu/core then frankly you don't have much clue what you're on about

>>130607300
>nobody could claim they're smarter than everyone else
nobody is doing this except for classicalfags though lmao

>>130610267
What are you even talking about?
>>130610284
Idk, sounds like cope.

>>130605559
>>130610284
Classical has a huge rep of being for "smart" people. Metalheads compare classical and metal all the time. Some of them even listen to classical and are dumb enough to continue acting like they're comparable.
People on this board will not listen to a band or artist because they associate it with "Reddit" or "onions" or "cringe" or "posers".
If there's anything I've learned, it's that most people who talk about music a lot are very pretentious and very pathetic, and dedicate tons of time and energy in their life to defending this.

>>130610325
I'm saying that going through a /mu/core phase does not exactly inspire confidence in your taste. You say you don't get filtered by anything modern, what exactly have you even tried aside from "/mu/core"? And to be clear you don't have to have tried anything, my guess is you don't bother with much other music at all and that's completely fine. It's just funny that you refer to people who don't find classical interesting or appealing as getting filtered but then you say you don't get filtered yourself. You clearly have some sort of superiority complex going on

>>130603814
Delusional poltroons think Wagner was profound when Pink Floyd rapes him

>>130610923
>brings up /pol/ out of nowhere
It's not a /pol/ thing. Wagner was really that good.
Even Jews like Mahler and Korngold were influenced by him. Korngold even scored a Wagner biopic in the 1950s.

>>130610408
>I'm saying that going through a /mu/core phase does not exactly inspire confidence in your taste
Pretty sure everybody on here, or the vast majority, went through that phase at one point or another. I went through it many years ago. It says absolutely nothing about my current taste.
>what exactly have you even tried aside from "/mu/core"?
Plenty of jazz, rock, metal, electronic, hip-hop, singer-songwriter, etc. artists that aren't a part of /mu/'s "canon".
Every once in a while, I'll still listen to an "AOTY contender" but they don't do much for me. I don't really feel the need to fit in and I listen to what suits me most. It has nothing to do with anything outside of that.
>It's just funny that you refer to people who don't find classical interesting or appealing as getting filtered
There's nothing ironic or funny about that. Modern music is easy to understand and consume because it's the music of our time. Classical isn't. Most people are filtered by it because they're unable to appreciate, understand, tolerate, or get through it. That's just a fact.
>my guess is you don't bother with much other music at all
>You clearly have some sort of superiority complex going on
Your guess is wrong. I still listen to other music. It's just not /mu/core or new releases from flavor of the month artists that Fantano or RYM drone on about. My comment was in reply to your idea that all classical listeners are "filtered by anything modern", which is an asinine assumption. Even if it were true, why is it a problem in the first place? Classical music has more stylistic and technical variety than popular music, and that's not even a controversial statement because classical has existed for way, way longer.
It's not a case of me being anything in particular, rather than you just trying really hard to project something onto me. I simply explained that your idea is wrong and that classical music subjectively appeals more to me. Everything else is your assumptions.

>>130611077
lmao

>>130603747
Classical music from the 17th and 18th century for the most part sounds like people with adhd composed it; the music changes all the time and it's not enjoyable, like most classical pieces are like ''oh here's a nice part'' and it lasts 30 seconds, then there's just a diarrhea of notes modulating to other keys just 'cause and it feels like a formal exercises more than anything