AI made me lose all interest in music altogether. Not just modern records, but also live music, doesn't matter when it came out. The simple fact that a machine can create a perfect hit has completely devalued the craft for me.I don't care if some boomer came up with a specific sound some years ago. You can have the same shit with a slightly different, custom flavor at the click of a button.I just don't see any value in music anymore.
bump
>>130711983Yeah it's over. Spotify are filling every playlist with their own AI slop tunes so the only people they have to pay royalities to is.... themselves. >get rid of artists altogether>keep ALL the money The important thing is to invest all those hard-earned trillions into military AI tech so that we can massacre all those smelly third worlders much quicker and cheaper.
but AI sucks at anything that isnt girly popslop and i dont listen to that
>>130711983>AI made me lose all interest in music altogether. Not just modern records, but also live music, doesn't matter when it came out. The simple fact that a machine can create a perfect hit has completely devalued the craft for me.>I don't care if some boomer came up with a specific sound some years ago. You can have the same shit with a slightly different, custom flavor at the click of a button.>I just don't see any value in music anymore.
Still waiting for proof of where these perfect AI hits are.
AI is such a joke/pyramid scheme that will collapse in a few years like the pet rock fad or something to that effect.
>>130712211A.I. is amazing. It's just used poorly by uncreative dipshits.A midwit with amplified cognitive powers is still a midwit underneath. They'll be swallowed whole.
>>130711983AI music is for soulless bugmen and all it can ever do is repurpose cliches in the most sterile way imaginable
>>130712211>AI is such a joke/pyramid scheme that will collapse in a few years like the pet rock fad or something to that effect.i agree but it's going to be an 2008 tier disaster when it comes because of all the millions that got invested into it that will vanish overnight
>>130712247it's just a pretty search engine, it can't come up with spontaneous thoughts like a human brain
>>130712191https://vocaroo.com/1uHg4c8L61JZ
>>130711983>Spotify has reached 761 million monthly active users worldwideI don't get it they already charge 20 bucks a month for the most basic subscriptionthe guy's already a billionarire how much money do you even need?761 million users paying 20 bucks a month= $15,220,000,000they make that in a MONTH so times that by twelve and each year they make$182,640,000,000
>>130711983If AI actually manages to produce stuff you enjoy just as much as the human made version, shouldn't you just be happy that you have more of it? And if it doesn't, what exactly has lost the magic? Popslop was easy to produce before AI, too.
>>130711983AI is just a glorified chat bot currently. it cant come up with anything on its own, it needs a human input.
>>130712211>>130712298it reminds me of those people who think chess is a pointless game to play because a computer could play it better than a human
>>130712526There is a certain class of person who makes a weird religion around technology, mostly because they rejected whatever religion they were raised in and need some new "god" to fill the void.
>>130712472tons of people do family share
>>130712211Just like the internet is just a fad.
If you like the music made by a machine incapable of anything except derivitive, homogeneous drivel then the problem is your personal taste and not music itself
>>130711983>The simple fact that a machine can create a perfect hitlol, can you send a link to an AI slop "perfect hit"? just one.
>>130711983>machine can create a perfect hit>a perfect hitby mainstream pop standards?gross. AI cant innovate. it can give you midi notes.there will never be a tiny breath when hearing the ai woodwinds, there will never be an accidental fret buzz when playing the ai guitar, there will never be an emotional voice break on the ai generated vocals.the tiny little things like that make music real. it's sterile dogshit otherwise
>>130713158example. the scream that Bruce Dickinson does at the start of TNOTB was accidental. their producer made them redo the track about 30 or so times and eventually it was driving him insane and he just involuntarily did that scream.
>>130712519No. It has no meaning. it is like going to an art museum and reading what time period something was made in and by whom. It gives you context and the painting a meaning. AI music is made by selecting a genre and it mashes up famous beats and lyrics together to create a Frankenstein song.You cannot identify over that music/artist or even discuss about them with someone else. Despite having lyrics it is just some meaningless sound like elevator music.
>>130713054Perhaps the situation is not as bad in the US, but here in Germany where everyone has to pay fees for playing music to an audience, supermarkets have simply changed to nonstop AI music for their customers. Public radio stations also changed to AI slop to some degree to save money.
>>130711983Mainstream music is incredibly simple and takes no effort to replicate, this isn't anything new. Also, everything AI makes sounds 10 years out of date
>>130713194all human culture is self-referential though? the Beatles were obviously influenced by their childhood music, which was mainly 50s R&R and the British skiffle scene. so it's no different than mashing up whatever songs you liked as a kid into your own music.
>>130711983huh
>>130711983If I ask Suno and Udio to recreate stuff like Tim Hecker they fail miserably, they can only recreate pop/rock/folk/dance stuff so far
>>130713272No what happens there is you would have Grok make a remix of Chuck Berry and Lonnie Donegan if you told it do to that, but it can't make an original sound as the Beatles did with their music.
>>130712364ok this slaps
>>130713194Most human created music is meaningless slop. I never cared about the person behind it and never will. Good art can speak for itself, context is just that: context. But what you should consider first and foremost is the content itself.
>>130713514>Most human created music is meaningless slop. I never cared about the person behind it and never will.
AI Music isnt rendered in high quality. Its like all youve ever listened to has been streamed. Live music isnt in trouble from AI until robots start playing instruments but that sounds pretty cool desu.
>>130713211you guys are lucky, i would rather have AI slop at the supermarket than have this:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DW0XUsyBBuY(though it's probably the exact same)
>>130713595this guy has a nice deep voice, I will now subscribe and listen to his opinions
>>130712171This is partially true but it's getting better. You have to really steer the models away from the mean to get something interesting, and that is an art in and of itself.
>>130712247>all it can ever do is repurpose cliches in the most sterile way imaginablelike all professional musicians?>>130712298>spontaneous thoughts like a human brainlol...you're literally a meat bot repeating what you've been told
>>130712166what you want to happen>The important thing is to invest all those hard-earned trillions into military AI tech so that we can massacre all those smelly third worlders much quicker and cheaper.what's going to happen>The important thing is to invest all those hard-earned trillions into Palantir so that everyone can be monitored without them knowing and all dissenting thought can be quashed before it becomes action.
>>130715298See >>130713537
>>130713158Pretty short-sighted take if you ask me. Generally whenever someone says “AI will never do X”, I am no longer surprised if 2 years later it is doing that exact thing. Reminder: nothing human makes it out of the near future.
>>130716001how's the weather in Mumbai?
>>130711983Name five great AI songs
>>130715416
>>130711983rip oliver tree
>>130712166Legally, you don't own the copyright to AI generated content, which means that while Spotify can receive royalties for AI-slop, they also can't stop other people from just ripping it from them and making money themselves. This is why AI art isn't really sustainable in the long run, because it'll just end up with artists eating eachother alive in a race-to-the-bottom scenario like a Chinese market that only has bootleg merchandise. The only way around this is to have a certain level of human involvement in the creative process so you can argue to copyright lawyers that AI was merely used as a tool, but in order to prove this you need to be able to demonstrate this, which means you'll still need SOMEONE real and present so there's actually proper songwriting/production credits. And to normalfags, it's not eve AI at that point. Pop music is heavily tied to celebrity culture anyways and if your AI slop doesn't have some real person attached to it then nobody is going to give a shit beyond having your music as background noise.
>>130711983>I just don't see any value in music anymore.Good, now kys
>>130716031>>130711983>>130712171>>130712191Buy SUNO music premium, and then ask Claude to give a good detailed description for the sort of music you want. Then edit the musics weirdness level / other levels, play with the bar. With this I got really non AI good indieshit sounding songs, better than most music nowadays.I am good at writing lyrics and most people aren't so maybe that's a factor in making it seem like AI songs aren't good enough I'm not sharing with you how it sounds. Keeping these gems hidden from you retards since you are contranian annoying 4chan retards. OP is totally fucking accurate, AI makes fucking great songs and it has ruined music because of its ability, you guys just haven't seen its ability which I'm talking about it right now.
>>130712191https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=I0RC2Z-V1I0
>>130711983The only good thing about ai is it's weeding out husks like op
>>130711983ok but it cannot play itwww.youtube.com/watch?v=_6A1DBHptJQ
