>>130889245...all of them?
>>130889245Grateful Dead
this post makes no sense whatsoever. so like literally every branch of music appeals to a demographic of people. like you could call people who listen to the Beatles old people and music nerds if both demographics die then theyll take a significant dip. like wtf are you talking about.
there have been articles saying that older music is more popular than newer music, this is why certain companies are going around buying up the rights to older musicface the facts,1945-2005 was a golden age of music. now we live in bleak times were poptimists tell you beyonce is just as important as bob dylan even though bob dylan will feature in every movie and history book about the 60s and beyonce will be a forgotten relic of the pop world
>>130889489But Bob Dillon sucks
>>130889489Bob Dylan sold his entire catalog of songs to Sony so his legacy is only going to be a shit ass company milking value out of that
EaglesJimi HendrixEric Clapton
>>130889316wtf no? they have the second strongest legacy of a 60s band. you see kids all the time with grateful dead merch and shit
>>130889261how bout i fuckin' rape you?
>>130889316But they aged well?
>>130889245Aerosmith
Elvis.
>>130897359I think they're already dead for the most part
>>130897359This for sure. Back 10 years ago I had a job where I would have to enter the homes of people. Of the older people the most frequent non family photos were Jesus obviously. After that, the older black folks would have a picture of Obama. The older white folks would always have a picture of Elvis.
>>130889261Classical music is still listened to howeverbeit
>>130889245I know it's not Michael Jackson
>>130889245All of the good ones
>>130898074all the bad ones too
>>130889316Nah, they will live on via their ties to the drug culture. Its not the music that brings people in>>130889245Stones, Who, Clapton
>>130897359>>130897363>>130897426Elvis superfans still exist they're just very very old now. Give it another decade and they'll all be gone.
Really could just list off any radio friendly blues rock with no real substance to it. You can already see the shift away even in living memory with no real love or respect for something like Grand Funk Railroad or Bachman Turner Overdrive. Oh and put Springsteen in there too>>130889261FPRP (first post retard post)>>130897259Yes>>130889316No>>130892816Probably, yes if his awful estate keeps going no if not, yes>>130897359NO>>130898110Hard no, maybe yes maybe no, yes
>>130889245the broader genre of "hard blues rock n roll"kiss, twisted sister, guns n roses, rolling stones, led zeppelin, acdc, aerosmith, etc.you already have these commercially block-busting bands tacitly downgraded to c-listers in rock music enthusiast circles, but once the influential boomers that hold them up die off, we will see overnight a true tectonic critical reappraisal of that entire scene into the same mental space of hate-circlejerking as skrillex or imagine dragons.it's all very formulaic nursery rhyme music that was sold to a generation through a pitch of being socially extreme and transgressive that just comes off as naive and dated to a borderline endearing extent now.