[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/mu/ - Music


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: mbv.jpg (239 KB, 1400x1050)
239 KB JPG
>my favorite band is my bloody valentine

What type of person do you imagine?
>>
>>130890048
someone who makes "how to discover music in 2026" videos on yt
>>
>>130890048
a gay faggot that needs their prostate stimulated
>>
>>130890048
Someone extremely boring and basic with zero individuality.
>>
a bretty cool guy or girl
>>
>>130890048
ME
>>
>>130890072
>zero individuality
not op, but could you explain further? also, to preface, while I like some of mbv very much (mostly just loveless and their self-titled record), I'm not the biggest fan - so I'm not upset by your characterization.

I ask because as far as I can tell music taste doesn't have to do with individuality or any other concept. their is/are causes, to be sure, but I don't think we can conceptualize them - certainly not in le current year. so - and this is true of every artist or band, potentially - while I haven't surveyed every person whose favorite band is mbv, I don't see why one would necessarily assume none of them have "individuality"; I imagine plenty have gone out and sought out other music, found a good amount they like, but ultimately like mbv the most for whatever reason.
>>
>>130890048
tiktok zoomer who thinks he's discovered a hidden gem of a band because it showed up in his tiktok feed
>>
>>130890103
MBV are fine, but typically the kind of person whose favorite band is MBV is the kind of person whose top 100 albums are the RYM top 100 chart.
>>
>>130890116
I see what you mean. we don't necessarily have to get (too much) into the finer semantic distinctions of the term, but idk that I'd describe the circumstance you mentioned as showing a lack of individuality. there is certainly a tendency for people to get most of their listening recommendations from one place, but assuming they genuinely like most of the top 100 chart, then their taste would just so happen to conform to the chart; I'm sure there are others who have heard most of the music on there and liked a minority of it - neither is necessarily disingenuous. but there is also the circumstance of people not thinking that critically about what they're listening to and "like" what is popular when really they don't particularly care for most of it sonically but are perhaps just creative types and at best find listening to new music interesting. the question is how often that happens, vs genuine enjoyment of the music, and tbqh idk.
>>
>>130890116
you are the type of the insecure faggot who would enjoy an album and stop listening to it just because it happens to be in the top 100
>>
>>130890048
MBV > Loveless > Isn't Anything
>>
>>130890048
someone who is subjected to a lot of vacuum cleaners and lawnmowers
>>
>>130892473
WEE--OOO--WEE
ERRRRRRRRRR
WEE--OOO-WEE
ERRRRRRRRRR
WEE-OOO-WEE
>>
>>130890048
anorak five guitar attack



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.