[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/mu/ - Music


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


>Twenty years ago, Radiohead released “OK Computer,” a landmark album that was profoundly prog: grand and dystopian, with a lead single that was more than six minutes long. But when a reporter asked one of the members whether Radiohead had been influenced by Genesis and Pink Floyd, the answer was swift and categorical: “No. We all hate progressive rock music.”
>>
>>130891783
Radiohead are underrated for their dry wit. So many of their songs have double meanings if you go into them looking for fourth wall breaks. I find the first track off Amnesiac to be hysterical for that reason. It's like a tongue in cheek acknowledgement that Kid A wasn't what people were expecting.
>>
>a landmark album that was profoundly prog

No it wasn't
>>
>>130891902
I think they meant in the sense that it was incredibly forward thinking compared to other alt rock bands from the time
>>
>>130891902
was about to say no, but when you think about it… at the time i was listening to "progressive" metalcore like Cave In and Converge, and Radiohead fitted right in.
it was impossible to not like "ok computer" back then.
>>
I thought they liked krautrock



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.