Mr. Ono Lennon says the internet has degraded the value of music in people's lives, since it's all widely available basically for free. He's right. Yes, it's convenient, but it comes at a cost. It's like how taking pictures has changed. You would only bring a camera to special occasions, for commemorating something or documenting milestones. In the 1800s, people used to need a photographer to do it. Now we all have cameras with us at all times, and it's great and useful, but photos undeniably hold less importance. We'll never go back, but I do think there has been more of a push against streaming giants and for physical media, because people sense what has been lost.
>>131003689Physical media is useless if we don't redefine the rights owning it gives you.For example there's a tacit agreement for wedding DJs to assume that ripping your own record gives you the right to play it but it's not actually true.But it should be.
>>131003797Oh and I say wedding dj because it's a closed non-commercial Event which is a comparatively specific thing to have a paid DJ.
>>131003797This is a useless random scenario. In the majority of cases, if you own physical you can play it however and you engage with and value it more.
>>131003689Eric wareheim
>>131003689Genuine talentless hack who failed at music and failed at social commentary
>>13100368910 years ago I scoffed at this stuff, but now I see the truth of it. The internet was a mistake.
>>131003689Art wasn't meant to be digitalized and sold like this. It's the same for 2D art too and even Video Games. It's all valueless now. If it would have never found it's way online we wouldn't have been able to generate it with AI either. While the deal fucked art as a whole.
>>131003689>caring about what 60s harry styles son says about musicyou must be autistic
