[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/mu/ - Music

Name
Options
Comment
Verification
4chan Pass users can bypass this verification. [Learn More] [Login]
File
  • Please read the Rules and FAQ before posting.

08/21/20New boards added: /vrpg/, /vmg/, /vst/ and /vm/
05/04/17New trial board added: /bant/ - International/Random
10/04/16New board for 4chan Pass users: /vip/ - Very Important Posts
[Hide] [Show All]


Janitor acceptance emails will be sent out over the coming weeks. Make sure to check your spam folder!


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: IMG_8223.jpg (192 KB, 600x600)
192 KB JPG
I don't get it. Can anybody explain why this album is so great and how I should properly appreciate it? I like other Rolling Stones albums but I can't get into this one. I love Rocks Off, but I feel like it's all downhill from there. But this is such an acclaimed album and I'd like to understand what people see in it.
>>
File: 10UMGIM10406.rgb.jpg (25 KB, 242x229)
25 KB JPG
>mfw
>>
>>131012142
you have to enjoy blues music and early rock n roll.
>>
>>131012142
The nostalgia over the Stones' legendary 72 tour had a lot to do with it, much like Dylan and Rolling Thunder.
>>
It unironically solved rock
>>
>>131012142
it was the climax of the Stones' prime career years after which they were respected legends but they'd never be a young, cutting edge band again
>>
>>131012142
It's overrated that's why
>>
WELL I'VE LOST A LOT OF LOVE OVER YOU
>>
>>131012176
pretty much this
it's not hard to get
>>
>>131012142
Apparently John Lennon hung with them during the sessions
>>
>>131012684
>Apparently John Lennon hung with them during the sessions
why wouldn't he? he wrote the Stones' first original songs that weren't covers (and they've never gotten over that to this day)
>>
>>131012778
They were good friends, anon.
>>
>>131012142
it filters a lot of people at first cos its rep suggests an instant classic but I don't even think critics at the time were that into it at first.
I 100% guarantee that if you keep listening the murky swamp sound will start to reveal utter SOVL and great songs, easy entry points are Sweet Virginia, Torn & Frayed, Let It Loose, All Down the Line. Once it starts to click you realize even fillers like Shake Your Hips and Stop Breaking Down are actually absolute bangers.
The decadent party vibe it was made in shines through and sounds like a bunch of people living life to the fullest



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.