[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/mu/ - Music


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: images.jpg (34 KB, 543x368)
34 KB JPG
why do vinyl rips always have a higher dynamic range? does this database even mean anything?
>>
iirc there's a limit to how much you can digitally compress on a vinyl master or something to that effect (I am not a producer)
>>
https://youtu.be/n-AE9dL5FG8?si=JAw_P-PCghpkuiB4
>>
>>131077166
post something people can read and maybe we'll tell you
>>
>>131077166
It’s not so much the CD vs Vinyl comparison as it is the year of release. Anything mastered during the loudness wars is going to be more compressed because that was the style.
>>
>>131077283
besides, who buys vinyls to get a brickwalled turd of sound?
>>
>>131077166
Sometimes the vinyl is genuinely higher dynamic range because it was mastered that way, but sometimes it's just the surface noise and phase distortion artificially inflating the number. It might also be the vinyl having less bass. Experiment with allpass/highpass filtering and measuring DR to learn how this works.



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.