[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/mu/ - Music


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


Who was in the wrong here?
>>
>>131302460
I wouldn't say either really were "in the wrong". The Dandys were all about image, maybe not necessarily sell-outs but definitely posers, caricatures. Anton is just crazy, too crazy to care.
>>
>>131302460
Why were critics so convinced the Dandy Warhols were something special?
>>
File: 1786487414344633.webm (1.5 MB, 480x462)
1.5 MB
1.5 MB WEBM
>>131302532
Because they went to the live shows and were mesmerized by Zia's glorious bare tits bouncing around
>>
BROKE MY FUCKING SITAR
>>
>Who was in the wrong here?
the one who didn’t put out METHODRONE… that’s who.
>>
>>131302532
the real question is why they were convinced bjm was special
>>
if anyone wants more wild BJM stories, I highly recommend Joels book, it covers the same period as Dig and is highly entertaining kino, Joel is a great writer, funny, witty and poetic, great insight into life in a scummy psych rock band full of junkies and weirdos



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.