/mu/ - Did it age well? - Music

>>131310918
It was a masterpiece from day one and still is. It was only performatively hated at the time so they could start clearing out Britpop from the charts and replacing it with the Spice Girls.

Anonymous
08/21/26(Fri)17:43:58 No.131311018

Anonymous 08/21/26(Fri)17:43:58 No.131311018

Who was the critic who reviewed the album as "Just like the Beatles, but boring"? He was right.

Anonymous
08/21/26(Fri)17:46:09 No.131311037

Anonymous 08/21/26(Fri)17:46:09 No.131311037

>>131311018
That's retarded, so probably Christgau.

Anonymous
08/21/26(Fri)17:52:56 No.131311088

Anonymous 08/21/26(Fri)17:52:56 No.131311088

better than Morning Glory desu

Anonymous
08/21/26(Fri)18:00:56 No.131311165

Anonymous 08/21/26(Fri)18:00:56 No.131311165

>>131310918
Oasis as a whole did not age well

Anonymous
08/21/26(Fri)18:47:07 No.131311560

Anonymous 08/21/26(Fri)18:47:07 No.131311560

>>131310939
This. Desperately in need of a remastering and editing of track length, but it'll never happen.

Anonymous
08/21/26(Fri)18:51:48 No.131311601

Anonymous 08/21/26(Fri)18:51:48 No.131311601

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3yQFebRcznA

Anonymous
08/21/26(Fri)19:28:47 No.131311940

Anonymous 08/21/26(Fri)19:28:47 No.131311940

>>131310918
What year is it? It didn't age well a year after it came out.

Anonymous
08/21/26(Fri)19:41:20 No.131312052

Anonymous 08/21/26(Fri)19:41:20 No.131312052

>>131310918
Kinda.
It really tries too hard to be iconic, and doesn't meet the greatness of the first two