Was sinatra the greatest singer in human history?
>>131617135no
no, but grown women threw panties at him when he was onstage.
>>131617135Yes, dude had literally no range at all but his timbre and phrasing were perfect. Such a pleasant voice.
>>131617219can someone verify this? I don’t into bad artists
>>131617135Yes.
>>131617484its true, but elvis was better
>so... snnnneeeEEEEED..... and-a-FEED>*annoyingly loud trumpet*
>>131618312Sinatra made better music but Elvis had more charisma and was more likable. Go watch that clip of them performing together
>>13161888054 years as a recording artist was a little more time than 22 years of recording.
>>131618312Roy Orbison > Elvis Presley
>>131618329Keked hard
In terms of male singers Sam Cooke mogs. Every single Frank Sinatra song sounds the same.
>>131617135mogged by his disciple Jim Morrison
>>131621402>Every single Frank Sinatra song sounds the samenot hardly. he used so many different arrangers that it kept him from being a one-sound guy.
>>131617135Frank's favorite singer was Perry Como. Dean Martin was better too. Frank's stage presence was the best, but his singing voice was not.
After he hit 40, he sounded like Tom Waits.
>>131617135Yes, just like how Carlinhos was the biggest chupador de cavalos in the globo terrestre
>>131622612or more likely Waits tried to sound like him
>>131617135that's not frank, nigga. tzd.
