[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
▼ Settings Mobile Home
/mu/ - Music


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: pmac1.jpg (29 KB, 605x612)
29 KB JPG
It's not really up for debate, P-Mac is straight up better at music than John Lennon.
>muh lyrics
Yeah... okay.
Anyways, a good indicator of whether or not someone truly appreciates music is whether they prefer the work of Paul or John.
If they like John, they're tone deaf. They don't GET music.
If they prefer George, they're a contrarian loser who identifies with a beta loser.
https://youtu.be/RXawa90YU2s
>>
>in b4 You-Know-Who shows up
>>
>>131684869
i just got word from my verified sources that he's on his way
>>
File: job.png (252 KB, 1313x287)
252 KB PNG
>>131684779
>spamming 60s zayn threads all day
i can see why old /mu/ hated this shit band and wanted it's fans off the site.
>>
>>131684779
paul has more good songs but most of the best beatles songs are john’s. that’s just a fact.
>>
>>131684962
agreed, i'm also gay
>>
>131684961
there it is.
>>
bump for interest.

I'm not a big music fan, but I'm a doctorate at music from Harvard and it's pretty obvious that Paul is better. That's what I did my thesis on (easy ass instant pass thesis because it's true) these days I'm just day trading Solana
>>
File: boybandfag_BTFO.png (444 KB, 1284x2057)
444 KB PNG
>>131684779
>>
Paul had the better solo career but I agree with this anon>>131684962
Although they were at their best when they worked together, see:
>a day in the life
>>
>>131687591
Agreed. My BF (we're both gay) literally clapped when you showed off your knowledge about a band who made music for teenage girls.
>>
>>131687601
You do realise they stopped touring in the mid 60s so the teenage girls thing doesn't really land. Also their audience is literally everyone, they're the best selling artist of all time
And why am I responding to this obvious troll post?
>>
>>131684779
Paul was objectively the superior musician but I can't deny that I think this is the best song they ever did and it's primarily a John song.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YBcdt6DsLQA
>>
both are gods
>>
john never made this song

https://youtu.be/p4E6KtQg_z0

zoomer tier wigger territory. embarrassing.
>>
>>131684962
>paul has more good songs but most of the best beatles songs are john’s. that’s just a fact.
This
Applies to their solo albums as well
>>
>>131691498
mean mr mustard is equally bad on it's own and probably worse for being a single album and in the middle of the medley.



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.