[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
▼ Settings Mobile Home
/mu/ - Music


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


is new music better than old music
>>
>>131697505
It's funny how I can tell their music sucks just from looking at them
>>
music peaked in the 1800s so no
>>
>>131697505
I feel like a bad person when I listen to and watch this video
>>
>>131697505
wouldn't, wouldn't, would, wouldn't, would, wouldn't, would
>>
>>131697505
is that leyland kirby on the far left
>>
File: images (5).jpg (66 KB, 588x426)
66 KB JPG
Long story short: no, but the science in your brain will make it harder to enjoy newer music unless it sounds like older music..
>>
>>131697505
Oh jesus this era...
>>
>>131697505
didnt one of these guys get me tood or something?
>>
>>131698301
I wouldn't be surprised if all the guys in that image got metoo'd
>>
idek who that band is



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.