>P4k et al go out of their way to push grrls as the saviors of rock since 2010s>none of these chicks actually rock at all in the sense of Joan Jet, the Pretenders, any riot grrl band, etc, they're at best generic pop or buttindie
>>131709611this is true of everything for the last like 10 years. every genre is just generic pop. r&b, rap, indie rock, even metalcore. we live in the age of the monogenre.
all mainstream, popular Western cultural output since the middle of the 10s has been aggressively mediocre
all i'm saying is the most one-sound era of pop since the 40s
>>131709611I typed "tate" in Google Images and got 2 pics of Tate McRae and 20 pics of Andrew Tate. IDK but i'd rather look at the former than the latter.
>>131709611Olivia has some rocking tunes thoughhttps://youtu.be/obSpLSnJ-wI
>>131709611none of them have ever been marketed as "rock" though?
i literally can't tell Tate McRae and Addison Rae apart or if they're not the same person using two different names
>>131710156Olivia and Phoebe have
I WANNA SEE OLIVIA’s RODRlGO
They all look like boring hags except for the one at top right
>>131709611Sabrina and Tate Mcrae are not rock whatsoever. Billie is like alternative pop. Taylor Swift and Olivia are pseudo-rock. (Taylor more lite rock-country-pop in her early days)Alvvays and Phoebe probably are the only ones that would fit some description of "indie rock".
>>131712855wonder why he didn't include Chappell Roan?
>>131712866Chappell has done rock covers for sure.
