[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
▼ Settings Mobile Home
/mu/ - Music


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: images (2).jpg (31 KB, 373x536)
31 KB JPG
Anyone else have the ups and downs in a career like him?
Shitty beginning, so much so he didn't include it in his canon.
Great 70s-very early 80s.
God awful 80s.
God awful rock side project.
Good 90s.
Disposable bland 00s.
Great 10s.
>>
I'd call his 90s great for Outside alone.
To answer your question.The most obvious one is Weezer?
>>
>>132088261
80s music isn't God awful unless you don't have a higher IQ score than anybody
>>
>>132088261
For very different reasons but maybe the Bee Gees ...? –I love them both btw-
>>
File: 1760376771831833.jpg (33 KB, 758x500)
33 KB JPG
>Great 10s
>>
>>132088285
Outside would be as good as an album from the berlin trilogy if he had edited the songs done.
They were built from jams and the jams meander too much, especially the intos and outros.
>>
Only his 70s were any good. The rest is forgettable crap
>>
Also: Bowiethread
>>
>>132088261
The older I get the more I think this guy was a Total CREEP. Entitled and completely creepy.



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.