[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
▼ Settings Mobile Home
/mu/ - Music


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: IMG_3954.jpg (20 KB, 400x400)
20 KB JPG
When did mid to low level musicians start to believe that they deserve to make a living off making/playing music? Feels like majority of bands try to tour full time now regardless of size. What happened to the part time hobbyist musician? Soon as a band sniffs a little hype they all quit their jobs and go full time touring.
>>
>>132107993
bands dont make any money whatsoever from streams, toadmong. they have to tour or die
>>
>>132108077
Most of them should because they fucking suck. You didn't address the post at all.
>>
>>132107993
How many part-time hobbyist musicians do you know who became successful?
>>
>>132107993
its either work at Mcdonalds flipping burgers or go on tour with your shitty band, its not hard to grasp
>>
>>132107993

the late 1950s/early 1960s
>>
>>132108133
That's not the point. Success in music is subjective and I'd argue if your definition of success involved money then you're into the arts for the wrong reason. You don't have to be poor, but money shouldn't be a consideration. Financial security isn't the point of making art. It's probably antithetical.



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.