>>132117265
Guccimarx's content is hilarious:
https://youtu.be/r90QPPRO_jg

https://youtu.be/8QcNyogPfWU

https://youtu.be/fknYbn_WJmw

https://youtu.be/eSAfr-U36RE

https://youtu.be/EeTDf6Anakg

https://youtu.be/DiX4zSauk08

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XXx6RDzR6eM

>>132117265
Kill yourself. No joke.

hey saar

>>132118775
kek
>>132117297
It works for comedy music but I doubt anyone is going to willingly listen to an AI generated album unless there's a real effort to mask it
>>132118778
Calm down, its not that serious

>>132118789
Fuck off. Retards are trying to spam it here and make it a thing. We will make it perfectly clear there's no place for this shit here and we have no interest in it.

Kpop is bad enough, we don't need to accept this jeet conveyor belt trash

Please, saar, how to make music in Adobe Illustrator?

Saaar please do not redeem the tokens

No thanks

>>132117265
AI is better than the disposable low quality tasteless crap on display here https://www.albumoftheyear.org/ratings/user-highest-rated/2026/
The 2020s killed the notion humans inherently make better music, as it only got worse ever since the end of the CD era, AI can create better stuff than gen z artists, so they're afraid they'll lose their income, that's the reason AI is attacked.

>>132120942
I get what you're saying. Funnily, as a zoomer, I enjoy much of AI stuff. It gets pretty obvious when all current music in boring as shit. And a strange different thing starts appearing and getting popular. Thinking now it's even cowardly to slander more inefficient AIs since there are much more potent ones that could be their target of criticism attempts; you always see people (here on 4chan or in most places really) calling works "slop" because they had the chance to know it was AI-made BEFORE calling it "slop", in a way that they wouldn't be so harsh if they didn't know it; and the same happens with the opposite, if they find some work interesting or "high quality" and THEN find out it's AI, then suddenly convert their opinions and feelings.
Pal, sth fun has to happen in this post-2015 time.

>>132117297
>https://youtu.be/r90QPPRO_jg [Embed]
even if this "singer" is as good as this singer:
>>132118775
>https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XXx6RDzR6eM [Embed]
it doesn't matter.

because if it's only being manufactured by a machine, and not expressed by a human, i don't fucking care.
not any more than i care that a tower crane can lift more weight than man can lift.

apples and oranges
the medium is the message

>>132118789
Why not say computer generated instead of AI generated? Does no one realize how silly this is? There's no such thing as artificial intelligence. Aside from being a misnomer there is no mental state involved, not by mammals. You're referring to a digital computer processing, doing what computers have always done. Input/output, nothing's changed.

>>132121347
fucking retard top 40 listener

>>132121590
Artificial mind maybe would be more interesting. Now there is discussion exactly on this "mental state", that you call, point. (Yes, it's) not by mammals, obviously. Now your body also processes inputs from the exterior, and it's too what human bodies have always done. Input, output, nothing (is) changed. What exactly are you talking about and what is your point?
I don't deny this discussion exists and I have the impression of not only not finding any actions of human brains that are not possible to be done by computers basically, but also that many of them that are generally very hard have been and are already being done by computers, but that doesn't mean I can't find in the future something possible for humans that is impossible for robots. It's just that to me now it not only doesn't appear reasonable or probable, but also sensical.

>>132121347
>I-I'm one of the good ones I swear! *gets raped anyway*

oh god i love the slop ohhh yeas i luvvvvvvvv consuming the thoughtless emotionless pile of garbage oh yea oh yeah im bouta cum from all this slop

>>132117265
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Hl5_Lc6b3AU

unironically this

>>132121590
don't be stupid, we use words that are 'inaccurate' all the time, but they work because we all understand what they mean.

>"filming a movie"
even when they're using digital cameras, not film

>"car key"
it's an electronic remote and never touches the inner workings of a lock

>"United States of America"
s run by, and for, Israel not America

many such examples

>>132121920
Yeah I'd never mistake a digital video for a film, I'm completely against that. What OP believes in is both a religion and a cult.

What website would you recommend for generating songs based on fictional music genres? I miss those threads where anons would make up word salads based on genres of music, and then others would suggest songs that sounded like them.

>>132117265
Indian thread

>>132121590
>>132121711
Just one correction. I'm very probably not gonna continue to reply to you if you don't use a tripcode with any name.

>>132117265
this thread is full of uncs, let me bless your ears oldheads
https://youtu.be/GTt0jfKBz00?si=ncygQhTM0wgB6Z3t

>>132118805
Seethe, there's no stopping it https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aLRmcVU2oWw