[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/n/ - Transportation

Name
Options
Comment
Verification
4chan Pass users can bypass this verification. [Learn More] [Login]
File
  • Please read the Rules and FAQ before posting.

08/21/20New boards added: /vrpg/, /vmg/, /vst/ and /vm/
05/04/17New trial board added: /bant/ - International/Random
10/04/16New board for 4chan Pass users: /vip/ - Very Important Posts
[Hide] [Show All]


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: 1770842091440282.jpg (451 KB, 1600x1051)
451 KB JPG
Why did bi-level vehicles go out of style?
>>
>>2069068
Can't get a wheelchair up bus stairs
>>
File: bus[1].png (513 KB, 492x491)
513 KB PNG
>>2069068
Made obsolete by tri-levels
>>
>>2069068
people are lazy and nobody wants to go upstairs unless the bottom floor is filled
but if it's filled and you only need to go a couple stops you're baisically going upstairs and immediately downstairs so you're not filling the top floor either, you just suffer
they make sense on long routes, and double-decker trains are the next big thing (especially with the tons of space between the trucks that regular trains can't fill), but buses and trams are retarded
>but long-haul buses
long-haul buses in general are retarded
>>
>>2069068
They only work for a very specific type of route (high-traffic feeder routes where the majority of passengers get off at a single stop). In all other routes, articulated vehicles just do the job better.
>>
File: IMG_2928.jpg (109 KB, 960x570)
109 KB JPG
They were never popular in the U.S. but the “Broadway Battleship” was a notable exception.
>>
File: IMG_8567.png (482 KB, 869x579)
482 KB PNG
Why do you think?
>>
>>2069068
idk what you're talking about, they're still all over yurop and even in the us and canada most commuter trains have two decks.
>>
>>2069113
So tolerant and diverse!
>>
you gotta keep your cog low
>>
File: Tallbike2small.jpg (45 KB, 398x336)
45 KB JPG
Still going strong where I live
>>
>>2069113
Something will be done about this post... and it will be done for free.

>>2069332
Vibrant, even.
>>
File: s-l1600.jpg (425 KB, 1600x1065)
425 KB JPG
>>2069094
Upstairs was smoking.
Been on plenty of double deckers in my days.
>>
>>2069068
https://11foot8.com/
>>
>>2069068
blacks and browns were brainwashed by jews to go on them so the white man had to cancel the entire program because blacks and browns are scary
>>
>>2069107
Absolute cinema.
>>
>>2069072
thay's why you have the bottom floor
>>
>>2070957
Can't restrict wheelchairs to a part of a facility.
>I wanna ride on top! Where's my ADA compliant elevator?
>>
>>2071057
i was on a commuter train once that just had ramps instead of stairs. also you can absolutely just say "nah wheelchairs physically don't fit here", if ADA rules made it so wheelchairs have to go everywhere then stairs wouldnt exist at all anymore

also buses already usually have a raised part at the back above the engine where wheelchairs can't go and no one shids and fards about that
>>
>>2069113
Crime only happens on the upper floor?
>>
>>2071549
Yeah, crime is illegal on the lower floor.
>>
>>2071060
There's some weird anti-ADA astroturfing being done in urbanist parts of the internet, as usual the YIMBY/real estate lobby is behind it. Maybe they figure they can infect train foamers with their vile ideologies too
>>
>>2071598
I noticed this recently; there's a ton of "local news" (owned by larger conglomerate) articles about islands in roads formed by bike lanes and how they are Good Actually despite being obviously fucking dogshit deathtraps made for having pedestrians killed by cyclists or cyclists killed by service vehicles or service vehicles killed by incompetent karens, on top of having objective legal problems satisfying accessibility requirements

probably a last ditch effort to save the hide of whatever giant conglomerate made the "recommendations" for "designs" that are so dogshit in the first place, so they can yet again go "See! It sucks, so it couldn't possibly work ever, even if we did it properly!"
>>
File: duplex.jpg (97 KB, 736x470)
97 KB JPG
Bring them the fuck back
>>
File: BC Transit.jpg (368 KB, 1000x750)
368 KB JPG
>>2069068
> go out of style?
Never did in Victoria, British Columbia. We still have them. We used to have a lot of red ex-British double-deckers in the 60's up to the early 80s.
>>
>>2069068
Maybe they reached a tipping point?
>>
>>2071673
Most of NJ Transit is double decker trains, at least all the lines I’m familiar with
>>
File: traffic.jpg (103 KB, 634x423)
103 KB JPG
Twice the passengers compared to a single deck. Boris Johnson introduced the bendy buses (long single deck) to London and caused chaos.
>>
>>2071664
>>2071665
A glitch in the matrix?
>>
>>2070772
>bc
sasuga
>>
File: 1763881471467413.jpg (35 KB, 750x525)
35 KB JPG
>>2069068
I think we're ready for two floor vans.
>>
>>2071712
>Twice the passengers compared to a single deck.
At a cost of higher axle weights, which makes for more road damage.
(There Ain't No Such Think As A Free Lunch.)
>>
>>2069068
Honestly I've wondered myself. With trains it's much more widespread wherever clearances allow for it, yet on the road where space is more limited they're quite rare except in certain places where they've been traditionally common.

I dare say there's no rational reason one way or the other and it's really just a thing of habit.
>>
>>2071837
>I dare say there's no rational reason one way or the other and it's really just a thing of habit.
This is the answer to 99% of n-related questions desu.
>>
high center of gravity and people are scared of them. probably also clearance for tunnels and underpasses and shit back when stuff wasnt built so huge, same for longer vehicles just not fitting around corners, as places have bene BULLDOZED FOR THE CAR it's less of a concern and there have been enough improvements into suspensions and steering that you can really have some longass nonsense going around

also theres only like two companies making buses in NA and they simply choose to not make them. they're still all over the place in yurop in more modern variants than the classig bonglander open topped nonsense thing. but the NA companies just make one bus and the bendy bus that is basically just two buses attached ass to ass with a vinyl accordion thing (ok not that simple but it's clearly just two of the same frame)

>>2071796
>muh road wear
no one cares. frost heaves and bad drainage do way more damage than a vehicle being heavy. if cities gave a shit about road wear they wouldnt let hicks drive snowmobiles on the road
>>
>>2071862
In a way yes, but on many issues there's objectively better and worse options (or at least decisions that clearly lead to one desired outcome or another). With double-decker buses and trams it's really a kind of meh issue, doesn't really make much difference either way.
>>
>>2071712
>Boris Johnson introduced the bendy buses (long single deck) to London and caused chaos.
No, he quite famously got rid of the bendy buses, that was one of his main pledges for his first mayoral term. Ken Livingstone introduced them. Pic related is a Boris Bus.
>>
>>2071997
In a rare moment, contemporary industrial stylists gave us a W
>>
>>2071999
This

>>2071997
Didn't those also have an open platform in the back like the old Routemasters? Man what a chance of retvrning to tradition



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.