[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/n/ - Transportation

Name
Options
Comment
Verification
4chan Pass users can bypass this verification. [Learn More] [Login]
File
  • Please read the Rules and FAQ before posting.

08/21/20New boards added: /vrpg/, /vmg/, /vst/ and /vm/
05/04/17New trial board added: /bant/ - International/Random
10/04/16New board for 4chan Pass users: /vip/ - Very Important Posts
[Hide] [Show All]


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: china-high-speed-train.jpg (135 KB, 899x565)
135 KB JPG
Why does China has so few Railway stations?
In total China Railways services around 5500 stations across the entire country, while only 3300 of which provides any passenger service, this include High-Speed stations.
SNCF operates around 3000 stations and DB operates around 5600. Both of which are much smaller in scale.
>>
>>2081255
A huge percentage of China's rail network is greenfield construction from the last 50 years where there's very deliberate planning on where to put stations, while France's network is about as old as it gets and a lot of stations date from a time when every town the tracks passed through got a station because it was so integral to transportation at the time it was worth doing. In France you'll have stations like Nice-Riquier which no modern transit planner would ever think of building but cannot realistically be removed without enormous backlash.
>>
>>2081255
because chinks think there are only two types of passenger rail: intercity HSR and urban metro
>>
>>2081255
Because putting a station in every backwater town means your service becomes worthless.
>>
>>2081282
as oppose to putting a HSR station in the middle of no where?
>>
they probably want to try and make the railway economically viable after pumping so much money into it
>>
>>2081281
Refute them.
>>
>>2081333
its a horrible system when you consider the average Chinese "city" has a land area of a small to medium sized European country, and with no reliable public transport within it.
>>
>>2081334
I remember in Shanghai (best city in China) you used to have to get the metro from the international airport to the domestic airport or the main train station which is at the opposite side of the city and this took nearly 2 hours, but they have a dedicated rail connection now (which I think uses the subway lines) to cut the journey to 40 minutes
So I think they are starting to realise this
>>
>>2081350
shanghai is developing a commuter rail network, jinshan railway + airport link with much more to come. don't think other cities are following along, just more and more metro (chinese edition, so a bit broader of a definition). shanghai also has a new tram, weird people mover lines, the crumbling maglev, and trolleybuses. i think pvg is getting an hsr line too. airport link isn't all that successful so they added intermediate stations but it sure beats line 2. too late now, but a true main intercity and hsr station in city center or just across the river at like century ave would be very nice..
>>
>>2081362
didn't they build the entire airport connector underground? how are they adding more stations?
>>
>>2081256
i've been to nice and i have ridden the tgv in that area, i dont see why huge cities shouldnt have more than one station
whats the point of having faster trains if you still have to commute more than an hour to get to the other side of the town
>>
If you look at some of the older railway lines in China, especially the railway network built by the Japanese in Manchuria, majority of the stations outside of any major city has been closed.



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.