[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
▼ Settings Mobile Home
/n/ - Transportation

Name
Options
Comment
Verification
4chan Pass users can bypass this verification. [Learn More] [Login]
File
  • Please read the Rules and FAQ before posting.

08/21/20New boards added: /vrpg/, /vmg/, /vst/ and /vm/
05/04/17New trial board added: /bant/ - International/Random
10/04/16New board for 4chan Pass users: /vip/ - Very Important Posts
[Hide] [Show All]


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: Formel1_hovercraft.jpg (81 KB, 640x420)
81 KB JPG
Why are hovercraft still more of a curiosity and not widespread? I wish they were, they're rad
>>
>>2084894
doesn't the skirt wear out quicker than tires and it's super expensive? I think that's why, iirc
>>
>>2084894
The regime in which hovercrafts start to outperform regular ships, completely other modes of transport start becoming preferable compared to water-surface-based transport.
>>
Fuel efficiency I guess. They have their uses where water is full of gunk that would get stuck.
Then there's noise and comfort in having a giant-ass propeller right behind you.
>>
>>2084894
very expensive, fairly slow, amphibious are irrel to most people's >USE CASE, and it gets btfo by waves (which exist anywhere where a boat is practical or fun)



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.