[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/news/ - Current News

Name
Options
Comment
Verification
4chan Pass users can bypass this verification. [Learn More] [Login]
  • Please read the Rules and FAQ before posting.

08/21/20New boards added: /vrpg/, /vmg/, /vst/ and /vm/
05/04/17New trial board added: /bant/ - International/Random
10/04/16New board for 4chan Pass users: /vip/ - Very Important Posts
[Hide] [Show All]


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: 1777082379566997.png (120 KB, 328x296)
120 KB PNG
>Thread theme: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BekKhIP0Jks

https://nypost.com/2026/04/26/us-news/read-whcd-gunman-cole-allens-full-anti-trump-manifesto/

Accused White House Correspondents’ Dinner gunman Cole Allen sent a sprawling, crazed manifesto to family members about 10 minutes before Saturday’s attack, sources told The Post.

The 1,052-word missive obtained by The Post Sunday morning — signed Cole ‘coldForce’ ‘Friendly Federal Assassin’ Allen” — outlined his “rules of engagement” for the shooting and stated he believed it was his righteous duty to target administration officials.

Cole Allen’s manifesto in full:

> Hello everybody!

> So I may have given a lot of people a surprise today. Let me start off by apologizing to everyone whose trust I abused.

> I apologize to my parents for saying I had an interview without specifying it was for “Most Wanted.”

> I apologize to my colleagues and students for saying I had a personal emergency (by the time anyone reads this, I probably most certainly DO need to go to the ER, but can hardly call that not a self-inflicted status.)

> I apologize to all of the people I traveled next to, all the workers who handled my luggage, and all the other non-targeted people at the hotel who I put in danger simply by being near.

> I apologize to everyone who was abused and/or murdered before this, to all those who suffered before I was able to attempt this, to all who may still suffer after, regardless of my success or failure.

> I don’t expect forgiveness, but if I could have seen any other way to get this close, I would have taken it. Again, my sincere apologies.

> On to why I did any of this:

> I am a citizen of the United States of America.

> What my representatives do reflects on me.
>>
>>1509510
> And I am no longer willing to permit a pedophile, rapist, and traitor to coat my hands with his crimes.

> (Well, to be completely honest, I was no longer willing a long time ago, but this is the first real opportunity I’ve had to do something about it.)

> While I’m discussing this, I’ll also go over my expected rules of engagement (probably in a terrible format, but I’m not military so too bad.)

> Administration officials (not including Mr. Patel): they are targets, prioritized from highest-ranking to lowest

> Secret Service: they are targets only if necessary, and to be incapacitated non-lethally if possible (aka, I hope they’re wearing body armor because center mass with shotguns messes up people who *aren’t*

> Hotel Security: not targets if at all possible (aka unless they shoot at me)

> Capitol Police: same as Hotel Security

> National Guard: same as Hotel Security

> Hotel Employees: not targets at all

> Guests: not targets at all

> In order to minimize casualties I will also be using buckshot rather than slugs (less penetration through walls)

> I would still go through most everyone here to get to the targets if it were absolutely necessary (on the basis that most people *chose* to attend a speech by a pedophile, rapist, and traitor, and are thus complicit) but I really hope it doesn’t come to that.

> Rebuttals to objections:

> Objection 1: As a Christian, you should turn the other cheek.

> Rebuttal: Turning the other cheek is for when you yourself are oppressed. I’m not the person raped in a detention camp. I’m not the fisherman executed without trial. I’m not a schoolkid blown up or a child starved or a teenage girl abused by the many criminals in this administration.

> Turning the other cheek when *someone else* is oppressed is not Christian behavior; it is complicity in the oppressor’s crimes.

> Objection 2: This is not a convenient time for you to do this.
>>
>>1509511

> Rebuttal: I need whoever thinks this way to take a couple minutes and realize that the world isn’t about them. Do you think that when I see someone raped or murdered or abused, I should walk on by because it would be “inconvenient” for people who aren’t the victim?

> This was the best timing and chance of success I could come up with.

> Objection 3: You didn’t get them all.

> Rebuttal: Gotta start somewhere.

> Objection 4: As a half-black, half-white person, you shouldn’t be the one doing this.

> Rebuttal: I don’t see anyone else picking up the slack

> Objection 5: Yield unto Caesar what is Caesar’s.

> Rebuttal: The United States of America are ruled by the law, not by any one or several people. In so far as representatives and judges do not follow the law, no one is required to yield them anything so unlawfully ordered.

> I would also like to extend my appreciation to a great many people since I will not be likely to be able to talk with them again (unless the Secret Service is *astoundingly* incompetent.)

> Thank you to my family, both personal and church, for your love over these 31 years.

> Thank you to my friends, for your companionship over many years.

> Thank you to my colleagues over many jobs, for your positivity and professionalism.

> Thank you to my students for your enthusiasm and love of learning.

> Thank you to the many acquaintances I’ve met, in person and online, for short interactions and long-term relationships, for your perspectives and inspiration.

> Thank you all for everything.

> Sincerely,

> Cole “coldForce” “Friendly Federal Assassin” Allen

> PS: Ok now that all the sappy stuff is done, what the hell is the Secret Service doing? Sorry, gonna rant a bit here and drop the formal tone.

> Like, I expected security cameras at every bend, bugged hotel rooms, armed agents every 10 feet, metal detectors out the wazoo.
>>
>>1509512

> What I got (who knows, maybe they’re pranking me!) is nothing.

> No damn security.

> Not in transport.

> Not in the hotel.

> Not in the event.

> Like, the one thing that I immediately noticed walking into the hotel is the sense of arrogance.

> I walk in with multiple weapons and not a single person there considers the possibility that I could be a threat.

> The security at the event is all outside, focused on protestors and current arrivals, because apparently no one thought about what happens if someone checks in the day before.

> Like, this level of incompetence is insane, and I very sincerely hope it’s corrected by the time this country gets actually competent leadership again.

> Like, if I was an Iranian agent, instead of an American citizen, I could have brought a damn Ma Deuce in here and no one would have noticed shit.

> Actually insane.

> Oh and if anyone is curious is how doing something like feels: it’s awful. I want to throw up; I want to cry for all the things I wanted to do and never will, for all the people whose trust this betrays; I experience rage thinking about everything this administration has done.

> Can’t really recommend it! Stay in school, kids.

fin~
>>
>>1509510
This feels like it was written to be almost stereotypical. Not helping the allegations this was fake.

Also why the fuck does he randomly single out Patel as the one guy he wasn't aiming for?
>>
>>1509514
Patel was one of the few nonwhites in the room.
>>
>>1509514
>This feels like it was written to be almost stereotypical.
It reads like the average poster on /news/. The only thing missing is him claiming that Trump isn't even American.

>Not helping the allegations this was fake.
I guess this is the talking point the left is going with now, because they cannot accept the possibility that spending the last ten years calling for Trump's murder might make somebody listening give it a shot - pun intended.
>>
>>1509516
>I guess this is the talking point the left is going with now, because they cannot accept the possibility that spending the last ten years calling for Trump's murder might make somebody listening give it a shot - pun intended.
No because
>Both Leavitt and her husband were literally talking like they knew it was going to happen
>This is the first time Trump ever attended the dinner and strangely seemed to have denied extra security
>They were back up in 30 minutes
>Trump didn't even seem scared when the shots rang out
>There was an immediately coordinated marching orders to start calling for the ballroom even though this guy didn't even get into the same room as Trump
>>
>>1509516
>somebody
The left is just surprised that you're somehow blaming them when a series of rightwing nutjobs try to murder Trump
>>
Weird that Patel was exempt for him. He's just as corrupt as the rest of them.
>>
>>1509518
>>Trump didn't even seem scared when the shots rang out
Nor did he during the first attempt in Pennsylvania. Was that fake too?
>>
>>1509514
Reminds me of how the alleged texts sent by that groyper that offed Charrlie Kirk that supposedly implicated him were written like they were from the 1950s.
>>
>>1509522
someone should hurry up and open a hotel called the pedogate so we can move on from these times
>>
>>1509520
He's brown though. A reddit moralfag would only shoot while people.
>>
>>1509521
>Nor did he during the first attempt in Pennsylvania. Was that fake too?
There's literally a thread on this board right now talking about the theories that it was.
>>
>>1509516
I'm not surprised people are trying to kill Trump, as they should be, but at the same time, THIS particular attempt looks fake as hell.
Then again, I could also believe that MAGA's secret service actually is that fucking incompetent and that their leadership is so crazy that they'd react like this, so...
>>
>>1509514
You're saying you faggot liggerals don't sound exactly like this ALL the fucking time?
This is redditfag morality.
>>1509519
There's no left wing. Liggies are all totalitarian piggies. That's why everyone hates you.
You are right wing.
>>
https://i.postimg.cc/CLBjqkbf/cole-allen.png
https://i.postimg.cc/nLz7nmVK/cole-allen-idf.png
>a series of rightwing nutjobs try to murder Trump
>the above pics
>>1509519
Good post
>>
>>1509528
>There's literally a thread on this board right now talking about the theories that it was.
And they're just as insane as Alex Jones claiming that Sandy Hook was full of paid actors.

You fuckers just can NOT accept the fact that after ten fucking years of wanting Trump dead every mother fucking day, someone was finally stupid enough to listen to you.

Look at this shit! Look right here at this anon >>1509529
>I'm not surprised people are trying to kill Trump, as they should be,
This is perfect. This is exactly what the fuck I'm talking about. But noooo! It can't be that! No, there has to be an elaborate fucking conspiracy. It is not at all fucking possible to you that some jackass like that anon tried to kill Trump.
>>
>just wait you fucking liberals, we'll tie a $25 dollar actblue donation to this guy soon enough and he'll be a confirmed democrat
>>
>>1509541
Maybe you should read that entire post instead of just one sentence.
>>
>>1509510
>all because Trump's afraid of the midterms, and cares more about a ballroom than the financial security of his voters
'Nobody cares about this shit. My gas and food costs have doubled since early 2025'
-Average Republican voter
>>
>>1509541
They don't even believe their own bullshit, my guy.
>>
>>1509546
lol nice faggot timeline there.
I don't think voters will forget.
>>
This was a false flag. MAGAts think everyone else is stupid.
If MAGAts have the ability to think, that is. And that's why everyone else knows that MAGAts are lying.
Q: How do you know when a MAGAt is lying?
A: It posts in /news/
>>
>>1509550
>I don't think voters will forget.
The average voter has literally negative reasons to care about jack shit happening to Trump. By the time November rolls around it will be the same issue that will kill Republicans in the midterm; Trump's admin has been a complete economic failure.
>>
>>1509551
>Trump hates the press, avoids this dinner every year
>Suddenly has this stalled ballroom bunker problem
>Now he abruptly wants to go to this event for the first time
>Even tho he and the Press hate each other more than ever before
>Sudden Attack!
>See guise, now I need my super bunker ballroom!
>>
>so many Ls for Republicans in elections since late last year
>why didn't Republican voters elect the Republican candidate in a recent election in the district which includes Mar-a-Lago, and instead ensured a Democrat won
Republican voters don't forget indeed. And that's the problem for Trump & MAGAtards in the coming midterms, when said Democrat-winning elections since late last year was the shape of things to come.
Certainly why.
>>
>>1509552
I mean, Biden was objectively worse by all metrics and he enacted everything Democrats wanted.
So, I can assume the platform is "Maximum pain for the US" since no one can tell me otherwise or do anything butt complain about the orange jewish man in office.
The orange jew is objectively superior to Democrats. I wonder if we have a comparative survey published anywhere?
Probably not, since surveys function as inaccurate confirmation bias for true religious believers in Democrats, despite them being so not left wing that every Democrat moron should immediately be able to identify how not left wing they are.
Then again, as stated, they're morons. And how would morons know they're voting against their own interests? They probably wouldn't despite the evidence. As the Democratic party is a cult.
>>
>>1509558
god your esl
>>
>>1509558
I am demoralized now. I better vote for the fascist republicans...
>>
>>1509562
You won't. Go vote based on your religion.
>>
>>1509558
>The orange jew is objectively superior to Democrats.
Going off his current performance and the fact he is now actively threatening the petrodollar because he can't just admit going to war with Iran was a fuck up: Fuck no lmao
>>
>>1509565
>Needing to base your decisions on an invisible sky magician.
>>
>>1509568
I know. I'm not sure what invisible sky magician you believe in, but you'll vote Democrat no matter what.
Why? You won't even share the reasoning as part of the platform?
You won't question the past and see if the policy aligns with your beliefs.
You'll simply vote based on "being a good person".
Weird religion. Hope it pans out.
>>
>butt complain
>but
A non-American that is part of the MAGA cult detected. But Americans are complaining: Republican voters betrayed by that which they voted for in late 2024 on the platform of 'No More Foreign Wars because Harris will start one with Iran' and a 'Golden Era': but only for the MAGA cultists' orange god and his billionaire buddies, and fuck the voters, his ballroom is more important, while the economy tanks, affecting those who voted for Trump even more. Then the MAGAts wonder why the same voters in the district in Florida which includes Mar-a-Lago didn't elect the Trump-backed candidate but the Democrat. Just as it's impossible for them to be a cult, it's now more than impossible for the Democrats to do any worse. Otherwise, why did Republicans elect Democrat Emily Gregory, and not the Trump-endorsed Republican Jon Maples?
>>
>>1509572
>that which
Stopped reading there. It's that which is a fucking schizo piece of shit posting.
Goodbyebye.
>>
>>1509572
>why did Republicans elect Democrat Emily Gregory
Special election. Wow. Huge.
>>
>>1509574
>>1509575
what?
>>
>>1509575
You read that slop? Democrats almost always overperform in special elections because they're composed of state union workers and otherwise unemployed, homosexual, activists.
That's why ICE managed to ice two dead fags on weekdays.
>>
>>1509571
>This level of projection
Not my problem you backed trump and he's succeed in destroying America.
Unless you're anti american and want that.
>>
>>1509579
Pro-American and think that Trump is generally doing a great job. Particularly after the Biden admin.
>>
>that which
>Stopped reading there
>>1509574
>that which
The duality of the hypocrite.
>>
>>1509580
So you're anti American, gotcha.
>>
>>1509582
>So you're anti American, gotcha.
No. Try again.
>>
>>1509579
I, like the majority of voters in 2024, believe electing a Democrat was a mistake.
The country would likely be on a far better path if the media and corporations didn't conspire to get a Democrat elected.
What's the democrat platform again?
>>
>>1509584
>What's the democrat platform again?
Uhm, we dont get a border and import a bazillion poor people every year and to pay for it we tax "the rich" (read: Anyone who makes ~$200K or more) into the ground.
>>
>>1509581
>The duality of the hypocrite.
Huh?
>Assfag doesn't get that it's being mocked
Interesting schizo shit there.
>>
>>1509583
>>1509584
>Anti American and an ESL
The absolute state of the trump regime's base.
>>
>>1509587
>he's spiraling again
>>
>>1509580
>Particularly after the Biden admin
A newspaper stated the day after the 2020 election result that Biden was 'The voice of reason and sanity'. Which newspaper was that? The Daily Mail. So either (check one):
[ ] That newspaper is right - even though it's right wing - and the Daily Fail poster in /news/ eternally fails
[ ] That right wing newspaper - therefore the right wing as a whole - is more than wrong, and so are you
Choose wisely.
>>
>>1509589
>Daily Mail
I don't care what foreigners have to say about American politics.
>>
>>1509588
>He's coping that trumps latest staged attempted has already been found out.
Your discord raid is too little, too late since people already pieced together what really happened.
You really wanting the Epstein/trump ballroom built?
>>
>>1509589
>A newspaper stated the day after the 2020 election result that Biden was 'The voice of reason and sanity'. Which newspaper was that? The Daily Mail. So either (check one):
>[ ] That newspaper is right - even though it's right wing - and the Daily Fail poster in /news/ eternally fails
>[ ] That right wing newspaper - therefore the right wing as a whole - is more than wrong, and so are you
>[ ] Anon should post tons of Your Dailymail articles
>Choose wisely.
>>
>>1509591
>Trump surviving yet another assassination attempt is causing spiraling like we have never seen before.
>>
>>1509582
>So you're anti American, gotcha
>>1509558
>butt complain
>butt
Hah, got him
>hypocrite shill doesn't get that its being mocked, by just existing in this thread
>schizo
>>1509580
>think that Trump is generally doing a great job
>schizo
It's interesting seeing the shill projecting.
>>
>>1509594
dude learn to 4chinz boomer. No one knows who the fuck you're replying to.
>>
>>1509593
>>1509594
>Election tourist discord raiders actually thinking their lies will fly on /news/
LOL
>>
>>1509589
>He states, referring to a USA Today opinion piece
[ ] Gay faggot
[ ] Faggy gay
Choose uninformed, homo.
>>
>>1509597
>the Daily Mail said
>actually it was a USA Today opinion
>>
>That newspaper is right - even though it's right wing - and the Daily Fail poster in /news/ eternally fails
>Daily Mail stated that Biden was 'The voice of reason and sanity'
Nice facts
>Anon should post tons of Your Dailymail articles
Nice fanfic
>>
>>1509599
Ah, I see. You're spazzing because some random anon spanked you.
>>
>>1509598
Linkies, queerbo.
>>
>>1509602
You want me to link the articles you're referencing?
>>
>>1509603
Let's do it.
>>
>>1509605
>trudie didn't catch the sarcasm
>>
>>1509595
>>1509596
>>1509597
It's so interesting seeing the shill projecting and flailing
>y-y-you must think as I do!
Then it wonders why nobody will come to its way of thinking, mainly due to it being a shill, and it being so immature and childish with its responses.
Mature adults don't behave this way, certainly in /news/. It only proves the inferiority of those who do.
>>1509558
>butt complain
>butt
And not just in terms of maturity, but education. But the shill complains because there are those in /news/ who refuse to think the way it does. If the shill has the capacity to think, that is.
>>
>>1509541
Why do people want to kill him? The media didn't do it, they spread a narrative.
Fox spreads narratives, Newsmax spreads narratives, Sky News spreads narratives.

I want to see you engage in the exercise and tell me:
> Why, philisophically, people want Trump dead?
>Not by simple mechanisms or ascribing action to certain actors.
>Articulate the moral reasons and strategic logic

Until you can complete this exercise you won't get it.
>Protip: random political killings have been lopsided to one political tendency
>Addendum - the kill niggers crowd can take out a dozen people and it's just a crazy person
>a targeted killing from the other side and everybody purges people for "milquetoast" (haha) social media posts.

Only one side is allowed to have guns and kill people. Once you uncork the bottle, the wine starts to stale. Enjoy the Lebanon experience.
>>
>>1509607
Damn I fucked up and posted in the schizo who's obsessed with trolling for post count's thread.
What a loser that which is you is.
>>
>>1509607
>N-n-n-no u...
Surrender accepted.
>>
>Could have simply said "What a loser you are"
>>1509611
>What a loser that which is you is
>Damn I fucked up
Indeed.
>>
>>1509348
>"I accept your concession" is something an insecure beta bitch would say
>Surrender accepted
Thanks, I accept yours >>1509612
>>
>>1509614
>He's seething so so hard over his surrender, he's cross posting coping now
LMAO.
>>
>>1509616
>he's projecting so hard due to his coping & seething being exposed
>not beating the loser fucking up allegations, but will claim 'n-n-no-u!' to deny he's seething
LOL
>>
>>1509618
>n-n-n-n-no u....
trump is losing biggly on all fields and everyone will forget about this latest staged attempt in a week once the Iranians reminder trump they have all the cards.
Sucks for shills like you.
LMAO
>>
>I'm >>1509618, who is exposing the coping & seething of the MAGAt shill reduced to
>>1509612
>N-n-n-no u
I'm the one who is exposing the MAGAt shill and wants Trump to lose bigly, especially with this obvious false flag
Are you sure you're linking the correct poster, anon, or are you admitting that I'm right?
Sucks to be a Trump shill, sure: but not for those who want to see Trump's political destruction.
Perhaps if you tried tracing back the previous posts...!
>>
>>1509610
Very telling that I have not been answered.
>>
>>1509625
You'll never get your answer.
I can't even get an answer about what the Democrat platform is.
So, just join me in yelling at these faggots that don't own nor care about their complaints:
>HE CROSSED STATE LINES!!!
>>
>what was Emily Gregory's platform for winning that election
Democrats don't need a platform when Republicans elected her.
As it's now more than impossible for Democrats to do any worse than that which is now the worst Republican president, and proving that fact in just over a year, for Republicans betrayed by that which they voted for in late 2024, the Democrats don't need a platform other than 'We're not Trump'.
>>
>>1509631
>Democrats don't need a platform
>Vote for me because...
>I'm soulless and empty inside
Convinced me.
>>
>>1509627
I'm pretty sure the dem platform is whatever wins at this point.
The owners aren't going to let the left flank of the party win, even though the field is more forgiving now for their excesses than ever before.

For so long as the dems continue to assert that they are a mainstream party and reject the left-pops, their platform will always appear fractured.

But they can't keep doing the same shit. Hillary, Biden, Kamala. What don't they have that Obama did? Well, Obama talked it more than doing it, but the answer us a populist change campaign.

Play up the unity angle only implicitly, call the reps freaks and degenerates. Bloody the knuckles. That's the platform, simple as.

The retirement home caucus is fighting it kicking and screaming.
But as the economy implodes and the threats multiply, the killings rise, people will converge on a solution.
>>
>>1509635
>The retirement home caucus is fighting it kicking and screaming.
??The retirement homes demographic is Democrats, as in people who still watch TV.
The young people shifted the vote in 2020, and then they said, "Oops we fucked up" in 2024. Probably realizing they're retarded.
Important to note that Democrats tricking younger people into voting for them based on taking an undeserved moral high ground, then capitulating to their corporate donors is their platforim.
>>
I guess all the Republican voters who elected Democrat Emily Gregory have souls after all.
It didn't take much to convince then to vote for her
>I'm soulless and empty inside
But enough about Trump cultists.
>inb4 'n-n-no u!'
Some projectors involve prisms, which are mirrors.
>I'm pretty sure the dem platform is whatever wins at this point
And as Emily Gregory proves, what wins for the Democrats - certainly since last year - is 'We're not Trump'. Just ask those Republican voters who have had enough of that which Trump cultists in /news/ shill for. And like their orange god, are failing. Good.
>>
>>1509638
>Emily Gregory
Democratic Emily Gregory 17,113 51.19
Republican Jon Maples 16,316 48.81
Total votes 33,429 100.00
No one voted except state union workers and jobless activists as always happens with special elections.
Here's a real election:
Image of Mike Caruso
Mike Caruso (R) 59.5 57,471
Image of Sienna Osta
Sienna Osta (D) 40.5 39,151

So, can you please quit cope-posting your stupid horseshit, you non-american fuckface?
>>
>>1509639
>quit cope-posting
When you stop shilling for Trump, but then you wouldn't need to be in /news/ if Trump had 100% of the entire US population's support: because he would if he was so perfect.
Why so insecure?
>you non-american fuckface
There's that projection again.
>>
>>1509635
Bearing in mind that a North Ireland scenario may be inevitable by this point.
You moron I meant the retirement home wing of the dems why am I bothering to write this?
Nobody cares about Emily Gregory you monomaniacal faggot.

>COVID fucked the mindscape up.

>Obama mobilized the take back america crowd.

>9/11 wedded America to Isreal for the next 2 1/2 decades and established Islam as an existential civilizational threat

>The fall of the Soviets unleashed euphoria and the Republican establishment loosened it's belt, turned into Steve Bannon's lardass.
>Reagan unleashes enterprise but kneecaps the human capital supporting it in ways that take generations to mature in order to appreciate (as fucking people does instead of tax rates).
>The spent civil rights movement only moves policy through court cases.

>Vietnam transforms the left and trains conservatives in the process, sunk cost fallacy inexplicably remains law.
>John Birch society birthed from the rotten afterbirth of the red scare as a viral reservoir for (at the time) southern discontent.

>Empire era's peak, USA simultaneously the industrial and technology centre of the world in a way China can only dream of, and Britain last demonstrated more faintly the previous century. The last of the Great Wars are over (for now)
>Populist reform post-depression revitalizes the nation soon to be supercharged by inheriting a postwar order and profiting at all turns.

>Reconstruction fails, leaving a remnant like tuberculosis waiting until the immune system is weakened enough to turn active.
>War with Britain (again) secures favourable terms for the US at the expense of permanent strategic denial of lands that become Canada, separate national identities harden in the former colonies.
>Overthrow of British rule. Cult of personality around founding fathers. Republic established whose foundations have not changed significantly in 250 yrs (impressive, but dangerous).

When was your last constitutional amendment?
>>
>>1509640
>When you stop shilling for Trump
When Democrats provide something better, I suppose. Which hasn't been the case since 1990.
All Democrats do is claim the moral hghground. Once elected they do everything their voters accuse Republicans of doing.
>>
>>1509642
Do you have ANY fucking cards to play besides projection? Any at all?
>>
>>1509644
lol. If you'd like to drop the mask and show me the projection, I'd love to see it.
>>
>>1509558
>I mean, Biden was objectively worse by all metrics and he enacted everything Democrats wanted.
Did biden:
Threaten to Invade at least 4 different countries allied to the USA?
Threaten to invade cuba.
Invade Venezuela.
Invade Iran.

Put tariffs on every country and crash the stock market.

Play market manipulation constantly during the iran war?
Scam billions in crypto tokens?
>>
>>1509642
>All Democrats do is claim the moral hghground
Compared to Trump, no 'claim' required.
When elected, Trump does infinitely worse than shills accuse Democrats of doing.
If you're so 'secure' about Trump's so-called 'superiority', there's absolutely no need for you & all other MAGAt shills to be in /news/. Your mere existence here is extremely telling. Especially your insecurity re. Trump. Or you wouldn't need to be in /news/.
>>
>>1509644
It's all just cards to you? Not principles, just shitposting and playing games?

Do you have visions of your own, values of your own?

>>1509610
>>1509641

I have yet to receive intelligent answers. I know why people want Trump dead.

I until you can answer like a man yourself why that is the case instead of pointing to the evil meanies, I see no salvation for you in this life or the next.
>>
>>1509558
Did biden appear in the epstein files?
>>1509558
>The document in question was an email forward from Epstein to his associate, Ghislaine Maxwell, from 2009, which was just after the late billionaire's 2008 conviction on charges of procuring a child for prostitution and of soliciting a prostitute. The email exchange apparently recounted a conversation between lawyers for Epstein and Trump.
>"Epstein's lawyers synopsized and quoted Trump as saying that Jeffrey Epstein was not a member of his club at Mar-a-Lago, but he was a guest at Mar-a-Lago, and he had never been asked to leave,
https://people.com/jamie-raskin-unredacted-epstein-file-trump-claim-11903119

different rep who viewed the unredacted files also said that trump didn't ban epstein from mar-a-lago:
https://www.youtube.com/shorts/LKWuBea3bos


epstein met with trump jr for coffee in 2019:
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA01028066.pdf


>Jeffrey Epstein told a friend he was in Palm Beach with “all the trump boys” on Christmas Day 2016—a month after Donald Trump won his first U.S. election, a newly released email shows.
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%2011/EFTA02666126.pdf
Epstein visited trump on 2017 thanksgiving:
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00989719.pdf


Trump met melania due to epstein.
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA01062797.pdf

epstein victims say trump involved:
>Epstein introduced her to Trump who subsequently forced her head down to his exposed penis which is subsequently bite. In response, Trump punched her in the head and kicked her out.
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%2010/EFTA01648946.pdf

>Donald Trump was complicit in abusing me to extort money from my grandfather and my grandfather engaged in similar activities. This is probably the biggest reason I had trouble geting help.
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA01250276.pdf
>>
>>1509644
Whoops, wrong poster.
Same concept.

Keep fighting the scum, brother. Pray for them to be cleansed. At this point it's Holy War on the MAGA fags.
>>
>>1509646
>Did biden:
>Threaten to Invade at least 4 different countries allied to the USA?
Probably. Let's check
Yemen and the Red Sea
Between 2023 and 2024, the United States carried out strikes against Yemen’s Houthis following attacks on commercial shipping in the Red Sea. The U.S. also launched a multinational maritime security mission to protect shipping lanes. Jordan / Iraq / Syria
It appears he has. WOOW!
In February 2024, Biden authorized retaliatory strikes on more than 80 targets linked to Iranian-backed militias in Iraq and Syria after a drone attack killed three U.S. service members in Jordan.
>Threaten to invade cuba.
Russian ally, Cuba?
>Invade Venezuela.
Russian ally, Venezuela?
>Invade Iran.
Russian ally, Iran?
Seems like they're getting taxed for attacking Ukraine. Also, no Russian nukes in Venezuela is nice.
>Put tariffs on every country and crash the stock market.
The stock market is fine. Tariffs taught Democrats how taxes are a net drain on the economy. An idea they can't seem to logically resolve so they just ignore it.
>Play market manipulation constantly during the iran war?
No
>Scam billions in crypto tokens?
No
but to be fair you made the last two up.
>>1509647
There you go. Now if only every president lived under the same scrutiny. If every state changed laws and misapplied laws to attempt to ensnare a candidate who else would stand up to it?
>>
>>1509651
https://www.axios.com/2026/03/25/trump-iran-oil-insider-trading
>>
>>1509650
>Keep fighting the scum, brother. Pray for them to be cleansed. At this point it's Holy War on the MAGA fags.
Moralfagging? Interesting. Don't assassinate anyone, OK?
>>
>>1509651

https://www.forbes.com/sites/danalexander/2025/06/05/this-is-how-much-trump-has-made-from-crypto-so-far/
>>
>>1509653
Paywalled, and Axios.
No evidence, just a claim.
Wooow!!!
>>
>>1509651
>Probably. Let's check
>Yemen and the Red Sea
>Between 2023 and 2024, the United States carried out strikes against Yemen’s Houthis following attacks on commercial shipping in the Red Sea. The U.S. also launched a multinational maritime security mission to protect shipping lanes. Jordan / Iraq / Syria
>It appears he has. WOOW!
>In February 2024, Biden authorized retaliatory strikes on more than 80 targets linked to Iranian-backed militias in Iraq and Syria after a drone attack killed three U.S. service members in Jordan.
Houthis are rebels. He was supporting the countries military who wanted the USA there.
Having a military operation against rebels with the consent of the government in that area is not an invasion.


Trump threatened to invade: Canada, greenland, ICeland, and probably mexico.
>>
>>1509655
This doesn't claim any scam has occurred.
>>
>>1509656
http://archive.today/2026.03.25-100454/https://www.axios.com/2026/03/25/trump-iran-oil-insider-trading

another article:
https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cge0grppe3po
>>
>>1509657
>Canada, greenland, ICeland, and probably mexico.
So?
>>
>>1509658
im sorry, let me correct. he grifted his followers with some useless shitcoin.
>>
>>1509661
Is it good or bad to threaten to invade allied countries?
>>
https://horsford.house.gov/media/press-releases/18-minutes-47-minutes-a-troubling-pattern-of-insider-trading-that-the-trump-administration-can-t-explain
>>
https://www.pbs.org/newshour/politics/trumps-threats-against-iran-are-a-boon-for-prediction-markets-including-some-backed-by-his-son

http://archive.today/2026.04.24-132059/https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2026-04-23/trump-s-iran-shifts-spotlight-washington-s-insider-trade-threat
>>
>>1509659
Also paywalled.
Additionally, I don't care about your complaints because you don't own your complaints.
They're complaint with the intent to persuade.
Shit's annoying. That why you aren't gaining ground.
>Trump raosed oil prices!!
So did Bidem
>Trump is causing inflation
Everyone remembers 2022, fuckwit.
This is the kind of shit you're never answered to. All the Democrats have done for the past 11 years is fling shit.
Everyone is tired of it. Except the shit flingers who keep flinging shit.
>>
>>1509651
>The stock market is fine.

the market recovered because he TACO'd out a few times and the supreme court overturned his tariffs:
https://www.scotusblog.com/2026/02/supreme-court-strikes-down-tariffs/


>Tariffs taught Democrats how taxes are a net drain on the economy. An idea they can't seem to logically resolve so they just ignore it.
https://www.brookings.edu/articles/tariffs-are-a-particularly-bad-way-to-raise-revenue/

>Tariffs are a regressive way to raise revenue. If low-income households consume more of their income and spend more on goods (affected by tariffs) than services (less so), tariffs are regressive because they force those with lower incomes to pay out a higher share of their income than higher-income households. While evidence varies as to the exact extent of regressivity, most studies agree that tariffs in the United States weigh more heavily on those with low incomes.10
>>
>>1509666
>Also paywalled.
Which link is paywalled? be specific.
>>
>>1509667
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trump_Always_Chickens_Out#Tariffs
>>
>>1509651
>if only every president lived under the same scrutiny
Every Republican one after Eisenhower? Sure.
Now, if you're so sure that Trump's not only 'superior' to every Democrat presiodent past & future, especially in terms of policies & morals, then admit that you're so ultra-secure in your orange god's absolute perfection thus there's absolutely nothing for him to worry about in the midterms and for the GOP in 2028 & beyond, own that supposed 'fact': say 'I'm so secure in Trump's superiority to the Democrats'.
Go ahead. The only one stopping you: is you.
>>
https://gulfnews.com/business/markets/iran-war-over-1-billion-made-from-suspiciously-timed-oil-price-tipswhos-behind-them-1.500512313
>>
>>1509670
>Every Republican one after Eisenhower? Sure.
>Now, if you're so sure that Trump's not only 'superior' to every Democrat presiodent past & future, especially in terms of policies & morals, then admit that you're so ultra-secure in your orange god's absolute perfection thus there's absolutely nothing for him to worry about in the midterms and for the GOP in 2028 & beyond, own that supposed 'fact': say 'I'm so secure in Trump's superiority to the Democrats'.
>Go ahead. The only one stopping you: is you.
Projecing ad hom.
Ignored.
You changed laws to attack Trump, held fucking show trials during primetime, put every action and word under a microscope, tried to prevent Trump from being placed on ballots in multiple states.
And some of it worked and you got power in 2020 based on your games, then FUCKED IT UP. Democrats suck, are unrepentant scum, and are trying to use every thing that got Trump elected to get elected.
I fucking hate you. You're scum. And you know you're scum. And you don't care.
Why would you ever think you could convince anyone?
>>
This dude really thought he'd John Wick his way through the hotel full of police and secret service agents? Wtf was this guy smoking?
>>
>>1509672
>held fucking show trials during primetime
What show trial?
>>
>>1509667
To elaborate:

The market doesn't reflect fundamentals. It's been in a reality distortion field since the first Trump term.
For as long as the wealth transfer continued to siphon upwards the growth could be sustained, and continues to under promise of continuity.
That and the prospect of enormous productivity gains with AI, but that is also due for it's dot-com moment.

But there's a floor. And when you hit that floor bad things happen. But fuck it hit the gas and accelerate for all I care.

Markets have stopped being markets.
Companies don't care about winning customers when shareholders are all that matter.
Innovation stagnant? Buy up a company that does something cool and just keep doing what you do.

So now people are poorer and businesses are less aligned with consumers than ever before. Rock solid economy, sure thing.
>>
>>1509672
>primetime

GET OUT genx faggot.
>>
>>1509673
Reddit moralfaggotry and of course, Marvel cape shit.
>>1509674
You don't remember the show trials? Americans do.
>>
>>1509678
>You don't remember the show trials? Americans do.
Who got a televised show trial. Be specific.
>>
>>1509677
The idea being after the boomers got off work they'd come home and see it and be all shocked.
Barely moved the needle though. Turns out, Democrat's bullshit only seems to work on retards and the young, which we know from exit polls.
And it's losing it's effect too.
>>
>>1509679
Not American. Can't vote. Fuck off.
>>
The best that >>1509672 can do:
>I fucking hate you. You're scum. And you know you're scum. And you don't care.
>Projecting ad hom
The duality of the hypocrite.
>can't own what - to them - is supposed to be a 'fact': that their orange god is superior to the Democrats in every conceivable way, thus state that they are 'secure' in said orange god's so-called 'superiority' to the Democrats in terms of policies & morals. 'I'm so secure in Trump's superiority to the Democrats'. That's all it takes
>is reduced to deflection
That is the most telling thing of all: other than telling everyone 'I'm so secure in Trump's superiority to the Democrats'
Why can't they convince anyone in /news/, if they ever think they could? Aye, there's the rub. It wouldn't take much thinking to say 'I'm so secure in Trump's superiority to the Democrats'.
If they cared, they would say that. Which was the only thing asked in >>1509670. It's such an ultra-simple thing to say after a simpler request then. As it is now: ''I'm so secure in Trump's superiority to the Democrats'. Go ahead. Say it, shill(s).
It's so easy.
>>
>>1509682
I am american. Who got a show trial? and why was it a show trial?

It sounds like you are just hallucinating things.
>>
>>1509684
Rambling horseshit. I stopped reading.
And of course it's you again. Why are your post counts so important, that which is >>1509684

Goodbye
>>
Trump voluntarily chose not to testify at his impeachment.
He decided to invoke his right to remain silent.
>>
>If they cared, they would say that. Which was the only thing asked in >>1509670. It's such an ultra-simple thing to say after a simpler request then. As it is now: ''I'm so secure in Trump's superiority to the Democrats'. Go ahead. Say it, shill(s).
>It's so easy.
>rambling horseshit
>I stopped reading.
>>1509651
>y-y-you must read my rambling horseshit!
The duality of the hypocrite
Of course it's you again. The Trump shill that hypocritically projects about 'important post counts' when that's all you do or you wouldn't be in /news/ in the first place..
Gee, I wonder why you can't say 'I'm so secure in Trump's superiority to the Democrats'...?
>>
>>1509689
>'m so secure in Trump's superiority to the Democrats'...?
I am, you stupid fuck and here's your (You) also.
>>
>>1509690
>I am, you stupid fuck
Say it in your next reply, then. Far be it from me to stop you.
>>
>>1509510
Lucky he didn't actually kill anyone. What's he looking at then sentence wise? 25 to life, with the possibility of patrol?
>>
>>1509510
OP, why did you format this in the most retarded way possible?
>>
>>1509695
>why did the retard format his NYpost article meant for retards in a manner in which retards would
I'm going to venture a guess that it's because he's retarded.
>>
>>1509510
Say greentext
>total EFFORT poster
Cole Allen's manifesto reads like this faggot consumed r/news like many others.
>I'm a good guy, I'm just going to kill people because I've been driven nuts
>I'm a good boy killer!
>>
>>1509561
>your esl
kek
>>
>>1509514

>absolute zero self-awareness that Democrats have become an extremist party of violent retards.
>look at me, i'm a democrat
>I forget everything
>even all the times I was violent or wrong
>I like putting people on the spot!
>forcing them to recount all the times I was a tremendous fuckup

They make you work for it. That's a legitimate mental disability.
>>
>>1509694
Probably 10 years
>>
>>1509709
>>absolute zero self-awareness that Democrats have become an extremist party of violent retards.

nope even the cato project agrees its mostly rightwingers (and foreign islamic terrorists if you count 9/11): https://www.cato.org/blog/politically-motivated-violence-rare-united-states
>>
>>1509546
https://i.imgur.com/cCgEfoN.jpeg
The inflation was caused by Biden. Why would they blame it on Trump?
If you compare the last 2 years of inflation to the first 2 years of Biden's term, the rate of inflation is far lower.
>>
>>1509732
>If you compare the last 2 years of inflation to the first 2 years of Biden's term, the rate of inflation is far lower.
but it isn't going down.
>>
>>1509737
So what does that mean for voters?
They could vote for Trump and have the cost of gas and food rise at a slower rate, or vote for Harris and have the cost of gas and food rise at a higher rate?
>>
>>1509738
It's only going to get worse under Trump due to his retarded tariffs and war with Iran. Most of Biden's inflation was runoff from COVID's decimation of the global economy; Trump accomplished similar levels of damage to the US specifically by himself in just a year and a half while also literally threatening the petrodollar because he couldn't admit nor recognize going to war with Iran was a mistake.

Oh, and he fucks kids and has been covering up for himself and other pedophiles. Voters are also gonna care about that.
>>
>>1509739
I remember a co-ordinated lawfare campaign against Trump during the onset of the 2024 election.
They went after him for paying off stormy daniels, for his loan evaluations. But they never went after him for fucking kids. Why didn't Democrats prosecute Trump for fucking kids and being a pedophile? Is it because those allegations weren't true?
>>
>>1509740
>Why didn't Democrats prosecute Trump for fucking kids and being a pedophile? Is it because those allegations weren't true?
Why is Trump actively covering up the Epstein files despite literally signing a bipartisan approved LAW that they be released in full and uncensored? Why did he lie repeatedly about cutting contact with Epstein in 2007 when Epstein's own emails show him in regular contact with members of Trump's team and even meetings with his sons as late as 2019?

Why hasn't Trump, who will sue over ANYTHING, sued anyone calling him a pedophile?
>>
>>1509740
>I remember a co-ordinated lawfare campaign against Trump during the onset of the 2024 election.
"Co-ordinated lawfare campaign" is a weird way to say "prosecuted him for things he very much did that were very much illegal".
>>
>>1509739
>still blaming covid for Biden's decisions
He didn't mind the pandemic too much when he decided to ass-rape our domestic oil production in the middle of recovery.
>>
>>1509747
Exaggerating Biden's impact on the oil industry isn't gonna make Trump directly kneecapping 20% of the world's supply any better anon.
>>
>>1509746
So if Pedophilia is illegal, and they were going after Trump for things he did that were illegal, if he is a pedophile, why didn't they go after him for pedophilia?
>>
>>1509742
>Why did he lie repeatedly about cutting contact with Epstein in 2007 when Epstein's own emails show him in regular contact with members of Trump's team and even meetings with his sons as late as 2019?
That's not the emails I saw.
I saw zero emails between Epstein and Donald Trump. I didn't see any emails between Donald Trump and Epstein after 2007. I didn't see any emails between Epstein and Trump's sons. I didn't see any emails between Epstein and Trumps inner circle, like Jared Kushner or Ivanka Trump
>>
>>1509753
>I saw zero emails between Epstein and Donald Trump. I didn't see any emails between Donald Trump and Epstein after 2007
Trump doesn't use email.

There are multiple emails where Epstein tells others he's meeting with Trump's sons.
>>
>>1509752
The files were sealed until Maxwell's appeals were finished, which happened in 2025.
>>
>>1509738
>watches orange pedo daddy piss off literally all of our trade partners with tarrifs that result in us paying more for goods; tariffs later struck down and costs repaid to companies that charged us more, out of our tax dollars. Watches trump start war of choice that fucks international supply chains. Watches trump alienate all our closest allies, sucking up to some of our greatest enemies. "HeRp DeRp TwUmP WaIs CoWsT SwO!"

In Biden's term inflation went up for the entire world, he wasn't the cause. Biden 2.0 is an objectively better choice than this self-enriching crony capitalist pants shitter. You clearly do not understand the concept of cause and effect.
>>
>>1509754
Okay then, do they have any phone calls or text messages between Trump and Epstein?
Do they have any evidence of communication between these "best friends?"
Do you have any emails where he talks with the Trump Sons about their meetings? Or just talking with other people about the meetings?
>>
>>1509740
They didn't go after him for paying off stormy Daniel's, they went after him for lying about the payment being a business expense. Apparently your memory is shit.

>why didn't dems prosecute Trump for fucking kids?

I dunno, maybe they were building a case and trump actively stopped it and has been fucking with the evidence because right wing retards he stacked the courts with decided he's above the law? Maybe there's dems and/or corporate interests tied up to the case and they're corrupt and protecting them?

Either way, if you look at the way the files were handled and at trump being king pedo's BFF and walk away with the conclusion he didn't diddle kids, you need professional help.
>>
>>1509758
>Do they have any evidence of communication between these "best friends?"
we have photos of them together for years.

>Do you have any emails where he talks with the Trump Sons about their meetings? Or just talking with other people about the meetings?
If they do, which it seems almost certain exist, they're among the files they refuse to release. Why would Epstein lie in his own private emails?
>>
>>1509732
>Trump cultist + coping + BDS = retardation
MAGAtard opinions go straight into the trash.
Like their orange god, cultists don't care about Republican voters' financial problems. Therefore why should those voters care about the cultists and their orange god?
>I fucking hate you. You're scum. And you know you're scum. And you don't care.
Either he shuts down the ballroom operation as a sign that he cares, taxes his billionaire buddies to the tune of 91%, as well as all of his grifting assets, gets the economy going again so prices go down, pays the mortgages, debts etc of said Republican voters now suffering, including their utilities & grocery bills out of his own pocket in perpetuity, or they refuse to care about him in the midterms: certainly the GOP beyond then.
Because cultists are doing a damn good job in persuading them otherwise in a backwater part of the internet that said voters have never heard of, yessiree! /s
>inb4 'ignored'
Why would you ever think you could convince said betrayed Republican voters wanting revenge on your orange god, least of all anyone here in /news/ who aren't cultists such as you? Why should they listen to your wrong opinions?
When I want your opinion, I'll give it to you.
>inb4 'ignored'
Which is what everyone else will do with your wrong opinions.
>>
>>1509758
How many times have you done this little routine of yours, shill
>>
>>1509766
I think Trump is doing a pretty good job.
If I was given the choice between another 4 years of Democrats or another 4 years of Trump I would choose Trump
>>
>>1509769
you're literally a shill
>>
>>1509769
Then you're fucking stupid.
>>
>>1509771
>>1509772
I may be retarded but at least I'm not retarded.
>>
>>1509766
>cultists don't care about Republican voters' financial problems
>cultists
MAGA only voted for the guy. You, on the other hand, think he's a luciferian figure because he doesn't give you free shit.
>>
>>1509755
That seems really strange.
So Epstein is dead, all sorts of people like Prince Andrew are implicated in the files. Why couldn't Joe Biden's attorney general go after pedos in the files? You could say he was trying to make a deal with Maxwell, but when it became clear a deal wasn't on the table why didn't Garland prosecute pedos? Why did they basically do nothing for 4 years and then hand all the power to Trump?
>>
>>1509691
Very telling that I have not been answered by >>1509686
>that very simple statement posted in >>1509670, and repeated three times in >>1509684, and again in >>1509689
Perhaps you can answer, >>1509769. Go ahead. Say that statement. It's so easy.
>>
>>1509775
It's almost like there were a lot of powerful people calling in every favor they could manage to keep those things sealed tight for as long as possible.
>>
>>1509775
>Republicunts are owned by Israel and too incompetent to go after Pedophiles
>Sorry, Dems have to do all the big boy government work
>>
>>1509773
>I may be retarded
>>1509769
>>1509774
>cultists don't care about Republican voters' financial problems
>cultists
>MAGA
>I may be retarded but
...you can admit you aren't by not being a shill. Otherwise, you are a MAGA cultist, thus worse than retarded. Those Republicans who don't care about that which you shill for, or he would do that stated in >>1509766
>he shuts down the ballroom operation as a sign that he cares, taxes his billionaire buddies to the tune of 91%, as well as all of his grifting assets, gets the economy going again so prices go down, pays the mortgages, debts etc of said Republican voters now suffering, including their utilities & grocery bills out of his own pocket in perpetuity
or they won't care about Trump, least of all your feelings.
>give you free shit
>being a shill
0.02 cents have been deposited into your account. Trump values your hard work.
>>
>>1509768
If these two guys are best friends there should be plenty of communication between them.
The lack of direct communication is suspicious.
If Epstein was meeting with the Trump boys, why are there no emails, text messages or phone calls between Jeffrey Epstein and Don Jr, Jeffrey Epstein and Eric Trump?
>>
>>1509788
>If Epstein was meeting with the Trump boys, why are there no emails, text messages or phone calls between Jeffrey Epstein and Don Jr, Jeffrey Epstein and Eric Trump?
Well we can't know that for certain considering the 50k unreleased files. But please explain why Epstein would be lying about meeting with them in his own private emails.
>>
>>1509781
>Otherwise, you are a MAGA cultist, thus worse than retarded.
"Everybody except people who agree with me is a cultist" is a sane take.
>>
>>1509796
He's right you know.
>>
>>1509790
So if the remaining Epstein documents are released, and there are no emails between Donald Trump and Jeffrey Epstein, no emails between Jeffrey Epstein and the Trump family, how will you adjust your assumptions?
Or would you assume there are even more documents out there which would prove that Trump is a pedo we just need to find them?
>>
>>1509799
god your life is humiliating esl shill
>>
>>1509799
>So if the remaining Epstein documents are released, and there are no emails between Donald Trump and Jeffrey Epstein
BUH HIS EMAILS is the new BUH HER EMAILS
never mind that there is written evidence that the two were correspondents
>>
>"Everybody doesn't agree with me because I'm a MAGA cultist"
ftfy, >>1509796
Not being a MAGAtard is a sane state to be in, yes. Indeed, sane non-MAGAtards are more than infinitely superior to those who are.
The absolute state of Trumptardism. MAGAtards are to be looked down upon, because they are inferior. And their wrong opinions never had the right to be listened to in the first place.
>Trump shill: 'b-b-but you must listen to meeeee! reeeeeee!'
When I want your opinion, I'll give it to you.
>>
>>1509799
>Well hypothetically if my hypothetical happened, you'd hypothetically feel reeeeeal stupid
If the rest of the files weren't incriminating he would've released them when he was legally ordered to.
>>
>>1509802
What is the written evidence of Donald Trump corresponding with Jeffrey Epstein?
>>
>>1509805
If the files were incriminating against Trump, Biden would have released them in 2024 as an October surprise to win democrats the election
>>
>>1509806
what is the reason why you decided to shill for pedophile billionaires
>>
>>1509808
share the proof that convinced you trump is a pedophile, feel free to convince some other people here
>>
>>1509810
the fact that you're here fervently shilling is great proof
>>
>>1509806
There’s the famous birthday card. Everyone knows Trump has literacy issues and doesn’t correspond by writing, come on man
>>
>>1509815
>>1509818
Trump going to a 60 minutes interview to try to capitalize on another right wing retard trying to shoot him and immediately ranting about how he's not a pedophile after being told the shooter hated pedophiles
lmao, he wasn't even accused of pedophilia, he just started loudly shouting he doesn't fuck kids like a kidfucker does
>>
>>1509808
Why are you using the same talking points as the assassin?
>>
>>1509824
What assassin?
>>
We have reached a level of gaslighting in which leftoids now deny the existence of assassins entirely. Phenomenal.
>>
>>1509778
So you're saying don't bother voting for Dems to solve issues you care about?
Interesting.
>>
>>1509839
I think anon is saying he doesn't care about nor own his complaint.
>>
Here's how it was set up.
Roger stone dips into the slush fund, hires a young black prostitute to pretend to be a communist engineering groupie (attempted assassin has a degree in engineering) and she constantly cries and tells the Patsy how she was molested as a child by rich powerful pedophiles and that tRump is a pedophile who got away with it.

She tells the patsy how the correspondence dinner is the perfect opportunity for an assassination.

To tie up loose ends, Roger Stone has the black sex worker murdered and incinerated.

tRump is not informed about the plan, because he's mentally infirm.

His handlers just tell him how cool it would be for him to attend the function, and they feed him a bunch of great lines that he can say.
It doesn't matter if the attempted assassin is killed during the assassination attempt, because he has no information apart from the black Transgender person who was disappeared.
>>
>>1509827
>We
There's only one Trump cultist here (You).
>>
>>1509802
>>1509806
see this:
>>1509649
>>
>>1509806
https://www.pbs.org/newshour/politics/see-the-alleged-trump-birthday-note-to-epstein-released-by-house-democrats
>>
>>1509922
>alleged
It's been confirmed by dozens of news organizations now.
>>
>>1509522
>Implying someone that looked like him wouldn't RP as someone from the 40s or 50s

It's just something some of them do sometimes. Like who would reviewbrah be without it?
>>
>>1509949
Wait I was thinking of the first trump shooter dude nvm. That dude looks like he would type like an obnoxious know it all like they love doing in so many different flavors.


Actually I'm kinda drunk and this is off topic but you ever notice how people type like that? The fuck is their problem?
>>
So how's that $10 billion lawsuit against the Wall Street Journal going for ya after they called your bluff, Trumpy...?
...and you're small Bombay potatoes Krash, so you have less chance against The Atlantic. Keep coping along with Pete Kegsbreath, Patel, along with pickling your livers Joseph McCarthy style. Perhaps you won't be caught urinating in the street this time, you toilet avoider.
>>
>>1509510
EVERY DEMOCRAT WANTS YOU DEAD. EVERY ONE.

Every single one of them harbors this desire. They leave the physical act of pulling the trigger to others. The moment the bullet finds its mark, the masks drop and the celebration begins. "For the common good." "To protect our democracy." These are the same blood-soaked incantations they have recited since 2016 when they swallowed the russia trump collusion lie like the retarded subhuman troglodytes they are. Back of disgusting vermin and traitors who all should be dragged in front of a nurenberg trial v2 for treason.
>>
>>1510054
Child, you aren't important enough to want dead. Literally nobody cares about you. Go play in traffic if you want attention.
>>
>>1509824
You mean the would be assassin
>>
>>1510057
They arrested the President of the United States of America 4X, charged him 91X, indicted him 4X, spied on his campaign, sabotaged his first term, jailed his supporters, raided his private residence, censored him, gagged him, tried to bankrupt him, and attempted to remove him from state ballots.

When all of that failed they tried to assassinate him not once but four times.

And they go on national television and lie about it all to you worthless brainless scum.
>>
>>1509510
After 3x attempts on Trump, Charlie, Kavanaugh, Scalise and more its clear we have a left-wing violence problem in America.
>>
>>1510062
also forgot the ice riots and the blm riots in which multiple people have been killed and billions of damages have been caused, all caused by leftwing democrats
>>
>>1510060
>>1510062
>>1510063
Get a real job esl shill
>>
>>1510062
Two Trump voters went for Donny and Kirk was shot for his virulent hateful antisemitism.
>>
>>1510060
>Waaaaah they keep considering my openly corrupt, rapist pedophile president who stole state secrets when he left office a criminal!
>>
I don't think it's weird that Trump keeps getting shot at, I think it's weird that the dudes who try it get worse and worse as time goes on. You'd think they would learn from their predecessors' mistakes
>>
>>1510077
>You'd think they would learn from their predecessors' mistakes
That's not how retards work. There's no training and lessons learned organization
>>
>>1510077
>>1510084
Also all signs point the guy being on the fed's radar, but trump intentionally weakening his security to make it so that the guy would get somewhat close to him so he could make an excuse to demand Americans fund his pedophile base in the white house.
>>
>>1509649
These PDF files are allegations
>epstein met with trump jr for coffee in 2019:
>https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA01028066.pdf
This isn't corroborated. This is not an email between Jeffrey Epstein and Don Jr. This is an email between Jeffrey Epstein and Andrew L Farkas alleging a meeting between Epstein and Trump Jr
>Epstein visited trump on 2017 thanksgiving:
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00989719.pdf
This is not an email between Epstein and Trump, or anyone in Trump's family. This is an email exchange between Jeffrey Epstein and Faith Kates
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Faith_Kates
If they had some corroborating evidence, like a 2017 Epstein signature in Trump's guest book, or a record of a phone call between Donald Trump and Jeffrey Epstein on Thanksgiving, or someone who was plausibly there like one of Trump's kids confirming it themselves.
But there seems to be no such corroboration. You are treating the allegations as proof. Like back during the Steele Dossier when people said there was a Trump peepee tape where he rented a bed Obama stayed at and pissed on prostitutes. There was no proof, it was just an allegation, and linking me the email or the PDF page of the Steele Dossier isn't proof it happened
>>
>>1510185
>This is an email between Jeffrey Epstein and Andrew L Farkas alleging a meeting between Epstein and Trump Jr
The guy "alleging" this is... Jeffery Epstein. You're saying Epstein is lying in his own private emails?
>>
>>1510188
Yeah. Because he was influence peddling.
Do you think Hunter Biden was being entirely truthful in his leaked emails? Or was he bending the truth while influence peddling his father's services?
https://oversight.house.gov/the-bidens-influence-peddling-timeline/
Hunter Biden repeatedly makes promises to arrange meetings with Obama, promises he cannot fulfill. But it's a part of the grift, and part of why he would get paid hundreds of thousands of dollars. Signalling your connections to the rich and powerful even if you cannot deliver is part of the game
>>
>>1510185
those things would be acceptable as evidence in court.
>>
>>1510191
It would be hearsay. Andrew L Farkas and Faith Kates could not confirm whether or not Epstein met with Trump JR for coffee in 2019, or if Epstein visited Trump on 2017 thanksgiving.
They can confirm receipt of the email, but they cannot confirm whether or not those things actually happened
>>
>>1510190
But he's not arranging a meeting. He's literally inviting Farkas to join him at something he's doing regardless. You think he just so happened to lie about doing this to what, brag? Hell that isn't even the only email that refers to him meeting with the Trumps in Florida.
>https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%2011/EFTA02666126.pdf
These aren't empty promises to get business deals; he's literally informing people of his plans that day and what he'll be busy doing.
>>
>>1510192
no, emails from epstein are not hearsay. thats not how it works.
>>
>>1510193
And how are they corroborated?
Did they ask Don Jr if he met with Eptein for Coffee in 2019?
Did they get any of his asssistants or staff members to confirm that meeting happened?
Are their phone records which back up the meeting?
>>
>>1510192
So subpoena the Trumps to see if they did in-fact have a meeting with Epstein on that date. Even if they fucking deleted every record they had, there'd still be staff that could verify whether or not they met up. Make them swear under oath whether or not they met Epstein that day.
>>
>>1510195
>Did they ask Don Jr if he met with Eptein for Coffee in 2019?
No and the fact they haven't is awfully fucking suspect, isn't it? Here we have Epstein's own emails of him saying he met with the Trump kids multiple times and yet they've never had to testify. Odd right?
>>
>>1510196
If Republicans lose the House during the midterms, they probably will. Like the Mueller probe I doubt you'll get the satisfying answer you were hoping for
>>
>>1510199
Oh I'm sure they'll deny everything and every record of their schedule that day just so happens to have either been lost or doesn't list who they were meeting with. But I think the idea that Epstein just decided to randomly lie about his daily activities using a family that supposedly cut all ties with him is completely fucking absurd.
>>
>>1510198
How do you know?
https://www.youtube.com/shorts/gIRfvB5FxrU
Do you have Google Alerts set up for Don Jr. checking all his press conferences to see if he answered questions about alleged meetings between him and Epstein?
I'm not that dedicated, so I don't know personally what questions Don Jr has or hasn't answered.
>>
>>1510202
Has he had to testify under oath? Yes or no?
>>
>>1510200
I just expect more corroboration
If Epstein and Trump really were best friends, you would expect to see some emails between them, phone calls or text messages between them. If he was having business meetings with Don Jr you would expect some emails between him and don JR
But the emails never seem to be Epstein actually talking with someone, it is Epstein talking with someone else about talking with someone.
>>
>>1510207
Not all of the files have been released.

trump claims he doesnt use emails or texts:
https://www.newsweek.com/donald-trump-claims-he-hasnt-sent-texts-emails-over-decade-1705430
>>
>>1510209
What attempts has the media made to corroborate these stories?
Like finding out if Don Jr was even in the same city as Epstein during their 2019 coffee date?
https://www.cbsnews.com/news/trump-lawyer-michael-cohen-denies-traveling-to-prague/
The Steele Dossier said that Trump's Lawyer Michael Cohen met with officials in Prague. Michael Cohen showed his Passport, and that he had never been to Prague, including when he was supposed to be meeting with Russian operatives in August/September 2016.
>>
>>1510248
>No he'd never use a fake passport while going somewhere to commit literal treason
>>
>>1510250
If he traveled with a fake passport to this secret meeting isn't this something the Mueller report would uncover?
https://www.justice.gov/archives/sco/file/1373816/dl?inline=
I don't see that anywhere in the Mueller report. If you could point me to the page I would appreciate it
>>
>>1510251
Michael Cohen literally got 3 years of prison for lying under oath.
>>
>>1510252
So he's not an authoritative source on whether or not he went to Prague?
Did the Mueller report uncover any evidence he traveled to Prague besides the allegation in the Steele Dossier? Any corroboration?
>>
>>1510252
he's only lying when he's saying negative things about Trump
he's completely truthful when defending Trump

also as >>1510248 mentioned, Cohen confirmed he wasn't in Prague at the time, and that means its absolutely real and proof that he wasn't there, even though you don't need a passport to go to Prague if you're already in Europe
https://www.eurail.com/en/plan-your-trip/good-to-know/visa-and-regulations
>>
>>1510251
The Mueller report states Cohen was not in Prague: “Cohen had never traveled to Prague and was not concerned about those allegations, which he believed were provably false,” the report says on page 139. That statement is part of a review of Cohen’s testimony to the investigators and is included in a section about what the Mueller team called Cohen’s “false statements to Congress minimizing the Trump Tower Moscow Project.” The report was silent on the issue of a device linked to Cohen pinging from the Czech Republic, and whether the investigation was ever presented with such evidence. The report confirms the investigation used this type of evidence, noting cell-tower records geo-located another person relevant to the investigation. (The investigation geo-located Erik Prince, former head of security firm Blackwater, at Trump Tower, for example.)



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.