View Announcement Janitor applications are now open. Apply here !
Anonymous Green Card Applicants Forced t(...) 05/23/26(Sat)01:06:00 No. 1516287 https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2026/may/22/green-card-applicants-trump-administration Foreigners seeking to adjust their immigration status in the United States to secure green cards will have to do so from outside the country via the state department, the US Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) said on Friday, in a move criticized by aid groups, policy analysts and immigration attorneys. USCIS announced the move in a policy memo, which directed officers to consider relevant factors and information on a case-by-case basis when determining whether extraordinary relief is warranted. The green card process had been unchanged for more than 60 years, marking the latest significant move by the Trump administration on immigration policy. “An alien who is in the US temporarily and wants a Green Card must return to their home country to apply,” said the US Department of Homeland Security (DHS), which has oversight of USCIS. “This policy allows our immigration system to function as the law intended instead of incentivizing loopholes.” According to an analyst with the Cato Institute, more than 1 million immigrants in the US are waiting on their green cards. >>
Anonymous 05/23/26(Sat)01:06:11 No. 1516288 >>1516287 People apply for green cards in two separate ways: by applying at a US consulate abroad, or by applying for a green card while already in the US, which is called an “adjustment of status”. With the new USCIS policy, many green card applicants in the US will probably be required to leave while their cases are processed – particularly affecting mixed-status families nationwide by forcing green card applicants to leave jobs, homes and relationships for an unknown amount of time. The agency is already struggling with a backlog of visa and green card cases. It is unclear how currently pending green card cases will be affected. HIAS, an aid group that provides services to refugees, among other groups of immigrants, said USCIS was forcing survivors of trafficking and abused and neglected children to return to the dangerous countries they fled in order to process their applications for green cards granting them permanent residency in the US. Friday’s policy change is the latest in a series of steps taken by Donald Trump over the last year to tighten immigration to the United States. Last year, the Trump administration moved to shorten the duration of visas for students, cultural exchange visitors and members of the media. In January, the state department announced that it had revoked more than 100,000 visas in the second Trump administration. The administration has also attacked other immigrants with legal status in the US, like refugees and other protected immigrants.>>
Anonymous 05/23/26(Sat)01:41:32 No. 1516289 >We just want people to come in the right way. >No, not like that! Literally every fucking time.>>
Anonymous 05/23/26(Sat)01:44:56 No. 1516290 >>1516289 No? We literally dont want people coming in from third world countries you tard.>>
Anonymous 05/23/26(Sat)01:46:22 No. 1516291 >>1516290 >we LOL>>
Anonymous 05/23/26(Sat)02:01:58 No. 1516292 >>1516291 >nooo you cant just do that!!! Cry you traitor democrat shit! CRY!!>>
Anonymous 05/23/26(Sat)02:14:47 No. 1516293 >>1516287 We have become such a fucking scumbag of a country.>>
Anonymous 05/23/26(Sat)04:36:10 No. 1516306 mr scorpion, if you sting me then we'll both sink>lol >lmao >>
Anonymous 05/23/26(Sat)04:38:58 No. 1516307 >>1516287 >(stephen miller kvetching intensifies) >>
Anonymous 05/23/26(Sat)04:50:07 No. 1516308 It’s a slippery slope towards the full eugenics program. They’re incentivising who you choose to marry >>
Anonymous 05/23/26(Sat)05:22:08 No. 1516312 >Democrat president Obama deported more illegals than Trump ever will Cry you traitor Republican shit! CRY!!>>
Anonymous 05/23/26(Sat)06:31:27 No. 1516317 >>1516287 >Turns out, AI cost more than hiring people! >https://fortune.com/2026/05/22/microsoft-ai-cost-problem-tokens-agents/ >Immediately deports everyone with a Green Card gotta love realities sense of humor>>
Anonymous 05/23/26(Sat)06:40:19 No. 1516318 >>1516308 Oh please, as if anyone can afford to have kids anymore.>>
Anonymous 05/23/26(Sat)08:11:40 No. 1516319 >>1516318 >he didn’t deny it >>
Anonymous 05/23/26(Sat)08:56:48 No. 1516323 >>1516308 >eugenics is when I can't bring my jungle monkey wife to the US >>
Anonymous 05/23/26(Sat)09:10:13 No. 1516325 good. this is what a nation is supposed to do to remain sovereign. a nation must defend its borders, first and foremost. >>
Anonymous 05/23/26(Sat)09:11:35 No. 1516326 >>1516290 except India. We like workers from India.>>
Anonymous 05/23/26(Sat)09:35:53 No. 1516327 Good. There should be zero immigration into the country >>
Anonymous 05/23/26(Sat)09:36:57 No. 1516328 >>1516312 That's absolutely false and you know it, ESL shill>>
Anonymous 05/23/26(Sat)10:32:38 No. 1516331 >>1516290 What's the big deal? It's from one third world country to another. >b-but the US is le first- No! The United sharts of turdmerica is a third world country masquerading as a first world one>>
Anonymous 05/23/26(Sat)11:03:24 No. 1516333 >>1516325 should a nation arrange the marriages of the citizenry>>
Anonymous 05/23/26(Sat)11:39:47 No. 1516335 >>1516328 You could just google it, moron>>
Anonymous 05/23/26(Sat)13:00:43 No. 1516340 >>1516331 >Ulcered Sphincter of Arse-erica The liggerals are starting to sound like the bad guys in that one movie. While the eurovans roll around ensuring they aren't doing any crimes on the Interwebs.>>
Anonymous 05/23/26(Sat)15:46:58 No. 1516364 >>1516333 no, and that isn't even vaguely related to this discussion. But thanks for playing.>>
Anonymous 05/23/26(Sat)16:07:22 No. 1516370 >>1516333 Maybe.>>
Anonymous 05/23/26(Sat)17:17:15 No. 1516386 >>1516333 Yes.>>
Anonymous 05/23/26(Sat)17:21:03 No. 1516388 >>1516386 It could be viable depending on the method.>>
Anonymous 05/23/26(Sat)17:21:38 No. 1516390 Miggerals in the Untied State of Ass are already the bad guys. >>
Anonymous 05/23/26(Sat)17:26:47 No. 1516394 >>1516390 >The [Spoiler]Left [/spoiler] Right can't meme.jpg Your mother is a fishhead you bloody bitch basterd.>>
Anonymous 05/23/26(Sat)17:34:23 No. 1516398 >descriptions under portraits of certain presidents at the White House >posts by the owner of Truth Social that aren't sentences of just several words in length The right can never meme.>>
Anonymous 05/23/26(Sat)21:33:56 No. 1516422 >>1516398 Of course they can’t. Fascism doesn’t create, it steals.>>
Anonymous 05/24/26(Sun)00:07:05 No. 1516466 >cultists of an orange thing they 'memed' into office now residing in trailers, consuming cheap food with red coloring in it, and never getting their Trump phones: living in pods, eating bugs, owning nothing and liking it Live by the meme, die by the meme.>>
Anonymous 05/24/26(Sun)03:34:51 No. 1516490 >>1516287 Good. Hopefully they won't let a single one of them back in.>>
Anonymous 05/24/26(Sun)04:23:26 No. 1516491 >>1516466 Kek>>
Anonymous 05/24/26(Sun)04:31:52 No. 1516492 >>1516364 It is though. By making it more difficult to marry a certain class of people, namely foreigners, it incentivises not marrying foreigners. This will affect someone’s decision making on whom to marry, and whether that’s by design or not isn’t relevant because a future government may recognise it as such and apply further incentives and disincentives to manipulate the populace into government preferred marriages. After that preferred becomes allowed. I realise it’s a slippery slope, which is why I’m attempting to explain it in a logical manner and from a future perspective. Everything can have an effect on what’s coming in the future, particularly with regards to government interference.>>
Anonymous 05/24/26(Sun)07:09:34 No. 1516499 >>1516492 >By making it more difficult to marry a certain class of people, namely foreigners, it incentivises not marrying foreigners >this under the watch of that which married the First Whore - not an American, but an illegal - resulting in Barron the anchor baby The duality of the hypocrite.>>
Anonymous 05/24/26(Sun)08:18:51 No. 1516500 >>1516292 YOU WILL NEVER BE AN AMAERICAN BORIS>>
Anonymous 05/24/26(Sun)11:57:18 No. 1516511 >>1516492 So?>>
Anonymous 05/24/26(Sun)12:06:59 No. 1516513 >>1516511 This ESL shill thinks the government should do everything for free for him and silence anyone who disagrees with his views, but shouldn't have any control over his life. Welcome to liberalism>>
Anonymous 05/24/26(Sun)12:13:16 No. 1516515 >it's okay for we of the right to marry foreigners >Orange Hypocrite-in-Chief Trump & the First Whore: an illegal >the not exactly saving the white race JD Weird and his wife & kids >you'll make we of the right seethe if you who aren't of the right do the same! So?>>
Anonymous 05/24/26(Sun)12:15:03 No. 1516516 >>1516492 Miscegenation laws were the norm in the United States until 1967, at which point Bernard S. Cohen operating on behalf of the ACLU appealed the case to the Supreme Court.>>
Anonymous 05/24/26(Sun)12:15:44 No. 1516517 >>1516511 The government should stay out of people’s personal lives. Marriage is a religious institution, if people want to get married and it’s allowed according to their religion then the government should rubber stamp it if they need to recognize marriage for legal reasons. The government should make no impediments towards marriage, and that means if people want to marry a foreigner they should be neither dissuaded nor encouraged to do so by any government interference whatsoever. This is the position of conservatives, libertarians, and liberals.>>
Anonymous 05/24/26(Sun)12:19:37 No. 1516518 >>1516516 Yeah ok but this isn’t strictly going to apply to people of different races* getting married. This applies to everyone, regardless of “race”. *as determined by the US government>>
Anonymous 05/24/26(Sun)12:24:29 No. 1516521 >>1516518 And so what's the problem?>>
Anonymous 05/24/26(Sun)12:26:14 No. 1516523 >Marriage is a religious institution Establishment Clause in the US Constitution means that religion has no right to exist in the law. Point out in the US Constitution where it says verbatim the words 'God', 'Jesus' and 'Creator'. https://www.archives.gov/founding-docs/constitution-transcript I'll wait. And the Bill of Rights =/= US Constitution, before you try using that as an excuse for your religious retardation. 'I do not find in orthodox Christianity one redeeming feature' 'There is more need for lighthouses in our country than churches.' 'But it does me no injury for my neighbor to say there are twenty gods or no God. It neither picks my pocket nor breaks my leg.' 'Question with boldness even the existence of a God; because, if there be one, he must more approve of the homage of reason, than that of blind-folded fear' 'I have examined all the known superstitions of the world, and I do not find in our particular superstition of Christianity one redeeming feature. They are all alike founded on fables and mythology.' 'Christianity is the most perverted system that ever shone on man' -Thomas Jefferson 'Religious bondage shackles and debilitates the mind and unfits it for every noble enterprise, every expanded prospect' 'In no instance have... the churches been guardians of the liberties of the people' 'The government of the United States is not in any sense founded on the Christian Religion' -James Madison Religion certainly never had the right to exist in US politics in the first place. Then, now or ever. >>
Anonymous 05/24/26(Sun)12:28:54 No. 1516524 >>1516523 >Point out in the US Constitution where it says verbatim the words 'God', 'Jesus' and 'Creator'. Yeah it sucks that there wasn't years of letters and papers and a literal declaration of independence that alludes to these things>>
Anonymous 05/24/26(Sun)12:31:49 No. 1516525 >>1516524 >independence ...from a king who would have continued to rule a land beyond his own, and was the head of the Church of England. Gee, I wonder why Washington & co. didn't want anything to do with him?>>
Anonymous 05/24/26(Sun)12:34:38 No. 1516526 >>1516525 If we follow your retarded reasoning to its conclusion, then rights only exist insofar as the law says they exist, which means anybody can change the law to do anything they want.>>
Anonymous 05/24/26(Sun)12:36:23 No. 1516527 >those who wrote the basis of US law, who said very unflattering things about Christianity >Marriage is a secular institution, subject to the law ftfy>>
Anonymous 05/24/26(Sun)12:36:44 No. 1516528 >>1516526 NTA that's what's going on right now and why we have what is effectively a dictator ignoring every right granted to us even by the constitution.>>
Anonymous 05/24/26(Sun)12:42:37 No. 1516530 >>1516526 >retarded reasoning But enough about those who believe that a 'God' exists. You cannot spell 'Believe' without the word Lie.>'I do not find in orthodox Christianity one redeeming feature' >'There is more need for lighthouses in our country than churches.' >'But it does me no injury for my neighbor to say there are twenty gods or no God. It neither picks my pocket nor breaks my leg.' >'Question with boldness even the existence of a God; because, if there be one, he must more approve of the homage of reason, than that of blind-folded fear' >'I have examined all the known superstitions of the world, and I do not find in our particular superstition of Christianity one redeeming feature. They are all alike founded on fables and mythology.' >'Christianity is the most perverted system that ever shone on man' >-Thomas Jefferson >'Religious bondage shackles and debilitates the mind and unfits it for every noble enterprise, every expanded prospect' >'In no instance have... the churches been guardians of the liberties of the people' >'The government of the United States is not in any sense founded on the Christian Religion' >-James Madison I know whose reasoning is infinitely superior to that of actual retards.>>
Anonymous 05/24/26(Sun)12:54:33 No. 1516531 >>1516528 >NTA that's what's going on right now But I thought MAGA was christofascists? This is why you're retarded. Liberalism only works if you can appeal to a power that's higher than the law as a justification to do things. But when it does you just get angry that you're not in control.>>
Anonymous 05/24/26(Sun)12:57:47 No. 1516532 >>1516526 >retarded reasoning >>1516531 >I thought You... can think?>>
Anonymous 05/24/26(Sun)12:59:39 No. 1516534 >>1516532 >muh rights >also we deny god >but we hate that the law is the final authority now Tranny logic>>
Anonymous 05/24/26(Sun)12:59:47 No. 1516535 >>1516531 >But I thought MAGA was christofascists? Yes fascists do not care about rights or documents detailing human rights. This is why you're retarded.>Liberalism only works if you can appeal to a power that's higher than the law as a justification to do things. If there's a power higher than law then your law means fucking nothing, it will just get subverted every time like how there's a orange orangutan right now bombing Iran with full support of his backers because "MUH JEEZUS SAYS THIS BRINGS THE END TIMES". Literally proving your ideology doesn't work.>>
Anonymous 05/24/26(Sun)13:03:00 No. 1516536 >>1516534 >those who aren't liberals The Republican party must consist solely of atheists then, if liberals think - according to your wrong opinions - there's a so-called 'power' that's higher than the law.>>
Anonymous 05/24/26(Sun)13:11:00 No. 1516545 >>1516528 >dictator ignoring every right granted to us even by the constitution. >He hurt my feelings on social media and won't let men use the women's restroom >>
Anonymous 05/24/26(Sun)13:19:57 No. 1516550 >won't let men use the women's restroom https://i.postimg.cc/xCrhBG1T/trump-massie.png Trump: 'Thomas Massie is a terrible congressman. He voted against men in women's sports. He voted against transgender for everybody - the mutilation of your children. He voted against open borders.' Trump's no longer hurting the feelings of liberals. >>
Anonymous 05/24/26(Sun)13:24:57 No. 1516552 >>1516550 Take your meds, schizo ESL>>
Anonymous 05/24/26(Sun)13:35:11 No. 1516554 >>1516552 >oh no! someone is using facts against my wrong opinions. I can't counter this !I must project and say he's a esl schizo who 'needs meds' when he never needed them in the first place! >>1516526 >retarded reasoning Accusations are Admissions.>>
Anonymous 05/24/26(Sun)13:48:30 No. 1516555 >>1516535 >If there's a power higher than law then your law means fucking nothing Only if the law doesn't comport with that higher power, which you insist shouldn't happen. Retard.>Literally proving your ideology doesn't work. My ideology does work. It was subverted by retards like you that prefer to kill yourselves over materialism and self-worship rather than facing hard realities. That's why you're a tranny.>>
Anonymous 05/24/26(Sun)14:09:26 No. 1516562 >a religionist doesn't comport with the law because it exists, unlike the religionist's deity, otherwise it would appear in a court of law/Capitol Hill to argue the toss. Every second said deity doesn't argue the toss in said establishments here & now, the concept of a 'higher power' never existed in the first place >a religionist's 'ideology' that has a nonexistent 'higher power' never works, or the world would be exactly as the religionist wishes it to be A religionist's ideology never worked in the first place, it kills itself by self-subversion in the face of reality & facts which proves its 'ideology' eternally wrong - otherwise the country it resides in would the the Talibangelist Theocracy of Godsville - especially when said religionist is reduced to projection by immaturely calling others 'tranny'. Accusations are Admissions>>
Anonymous 05/24/26(Sun)16:58:09 No. 1516596 >>1516523 If the government has nothing to do with religion then the government should not involve itself with religious matters such as marriage.>>
Anonymous 05/24/26(Sun)16:59:32 No. 1516597 >>1516535 Trump isn’t bombing Iran for those reasons.>>
Anonymous 05/24/26(Sun)17:23:40 No. 1516600 >>1516287 Why would anyone want to immigrate to the US right now?>>
Anonymous 05/24/26(Sun)18:59:30 No. 1516625 >>1516596 Marriage isn't a religious matter you disingenuous dipshit, it is a secular contract between two people and the government.>>
Anonymous 05/24/26(Sun)19:31:42 No. 1516635 >>1516289 >waaaaaahhh you can't get rid of our bullshit loopholes!!! >>
Anonymous 05/24/26(Sun)20:02:54 No. 1516645 >>1516625 That's only because western culture is 100% built on Christianity. Therefore what you believe to be secular is usually abstracted Christianity so deeply ingrained in you, you believe it's secular Have you seen a doctor about being a faggot?>>
Anonymous 05/24/26(Sun)20:09:30 No. 1516646 >>1516635 >loopholes I don't think you know what that means.>>
Anonymous 05/24/26(Sun)20:51:10 No. 1516652 >>1516625 No, it’s religious. Every religion has marriage, irreligious people getting married are either hypocrites or doing it for cultural reasons, and if you want secularism you should keep the government out of religious matters. If the government needs to know who’s married they can have a registration process that’s perfectly acceptable, but the government should otherwise stay out of it and forcing people to leave the country in order to get their marriage registered is bullshit>>
Anonymous 05/24/26(Sun)22:20:50 No. 1516669 >western culture is 100% built on Christianity >it’s religious Nice fanfics>>
Anonymous 05/24/26(Sun)22:42:53 No. 1516670 >>1516652 >or doing it for cultural reasons Or financial. I save so much money on taxes, it's ridiculous.>>
Anonymous 05/24/26(Sun)22:58:07 No. 1516671 >it’s religious 'Marriage'. Via a religion in which a deity - via the Holy Spook - put Mary in Le Club Pudding before her husband Joseph had so much as touched her. Mary: an underage child bride-to-be. Thus said deity had committed the sin of Adultery. And the infinitely worse sin of Pedophilia. One can see where - and why - 'Christian' Republicans refuse to make illegal child marriages in certain states. That's their 'morality': if their 'Ultimate Arbiter of Superior Morals' can put a bun in the oven of an underage girl, why shouldn't they follow their deity's example...? Ergo, the GOP: Gang Of Pedophiles. At least many secular societies only allow marriage at 18 and over.>>
Anonymous 05/25/26(Mon)00:20:48 No. 1516678 >>1516671 You write like a boomer. Pretty cringe to still be rebelling against daddy in your early sixties.>>
Anonymous 05/25/26(Mon)00:36:43 No. 1516683 >oh no! Someone is using facts that I can't counter again! I must respond in an immature way and call him a 'boomer'! Pretty cringe.>>
Anonymous 05/25/26(Mon)00:54:20 No. 1516685 >>1516646 >said the same faggots who thinks there's a "gun show loophole" >>
Anonymous 05/25/26(Mon)00:56:11 No. 1516687 >>1516685 The fuck does that have to do with you not being able to use the word "loophole" correctly?>>
Anonymous 05/25/26(Mon)03:15:16 No. 1516700 >>1516287 completely retarded. The entire reason we were letting people apply within the US is because it made no sense for them to apply abroad when the system is so backed up and it can take anywhere from months to over a decade depending on your specific situation. Why build a life paying taxes abroad when you are trying to build a life as an American and have already successfully lived here for a while?? This is dumb. It's complete nonsense made to appeal to people that want 0 immigration as a matter of principle. And those people should be ignored precisely because they're unreasonable and intellectually unmovable. Content having boisterous and indefensible ideas on subjects they know nothing about.>>
Anonymous 05/25/26(Mon)05:01:02 No. 1516708 >>1516671 Every religion has marriage not only Christianity. There’s no need for you to go on a diatribe about it, if you want to change the laws around age of consent it has nothing to do with marriage being a religious institution>>
Anonymous 05/25/26(Mon)06:04:17 No. 1516710 >diatribe >what was said by two or the Founding Fathers >what has been said in this thread by that which is 'religious': yet only demonstrates how religionism can only be inferior to superior secular states >one particular religion is due to what is basically pedophilia >In this instance, age of consent has more than everything to do with how vile that which some... thing 'claims' to be outside of the law: religion >Religionist Republicans refusing to make child marriages illegal in certain US states: QED >'Christianity is the most perverted system that ever shone on man' Christianity is a dire tribe indeed.>>
Anonymous 05/25/26(Mon)08:51:59 No. 1516729 >>1516652 >No, it's religious... cultural reasons.... So it's always religious... except when it isn't.... so what about this person:>>1516670 > or financial, I save so much money on taxes.... But wait... you're telling me marriage saves money on taxes.... like some kind of contract with the government.... and secular people get married. And people from different religions get married, so it clearly isn't a useful, culturally ubiquitous concept, it's a religious ceremony where only Christians buy a wife from her father and nothing else. Makes sense.... No wait, the other thing, that's fucking retarded. You're right. People shouldn't have to leave the country to get married. I guess even a broken clock is right twice a day.>>
Anonymous 05/25/26(Mon)08:54:33 No. 1516730 >>1516328 Obama had the biggest deportations, the best numbers>>
Anonymous 05/25/26(Mon)09:02:15 No. 1516733 >>1516645 >Western culture is 100% built on Christianity.... Our deist founding fathers who admired Greek philosophy would probably disagree.>what you believe to be secular... No, see, I don't think faggots like you should be stoned to death, and that's one example of hundreds of my morality being kinder and gentler than the authors of your stupid book.>Have you seen a doctor about being a faggot. Why? Are you recognizing some of your symptoms in me, or does fantasizing about me being a faggot just make you hard? Better go pray about tha>>
Anonymous 05/25/26(Mon)09:46:44 No. 1516739 >>1516729 A true secularist would be against any sort of tax relief for married couples>>
Anonymous 05/25/26(Mon)10:39:47 No. 1516741 >A true secularist would be against any sort of tax relief for married couples As a true secularist, I'd be fine with tax relief for married couples as long as those couples were married in a secular way, by, say, a justice of the peace. Those married religiously, no tax relief for you >>
Anonymous 05/25/26(Mon)12:32:02 No. 1516751 >>1516687 It demonstrates your hypocrisy, since you don't know what a loophole is.
Delete Post: [ File Only] Style: Yotsuba Yotsuba B Futaba Burichan Tomorrow Photon
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.