https://www.thedailybeast.com/rogue-republican-massie-drops-melania-epstein-files-bomb/>Rep. Thomas Massie has claimed that Melania Trump “knows” Jeffrey Epstein wasn’t running his child sex abuse ring alone.>Massie, 55, appeared on Meet the Press Sunday, and confirmed that he planned to personally reveal more names from the Epstein files after a lack of clear action from the acting attorney general.>“Todd Blanche is violating the law. There’s still millions of files they haven’t released,” he said.>“We know from talking to the victims’ lawyers that their own 302 forms haven’t been released. We know the files have been over-redacted. I have released at least three names of billionaires who are implicated in this.”>The Republican, who lost his House primary last week, added: “I don’t think it’s possible to get to convictions with Todd Blanche at the top and with the FBI director, Kash Patel, at the top, because they have effectively both perjured themselves by saying there’s nobody else in the files.”>He then claimed of Donald Trump’s wife: “Even Melania doesn’t believe that. The first lady knows that Jeffrey Epstein didn’t act alone.”>Massie concluded that the truth he—and, supposedly, Melania Trump—knows will ultimately come to light. “And here’s the great thing, Kristen. Whether I’m in Congress or not, the Epstein Files Transparency Act is a law, and it goes on for years,” he said.>“So, if we can’t get this attorney general and this FBI director to do the right thing, the next ones who take those seats are obligated by law to release the files that these individuals are not releasing now.”>The first lady’s office did not immediately respond to request for comment.>Melania has also called for further investigation into the events surrounding Epstein, after professing her own lack of relationship with the man during a surprise public address last month.
>While asserting she was neither one of Epstein’s victims nor introduced to Donald Trump by the financier, Melania, 56, called for public congressional hearings on behalf of survivors, a move some critics say could cause further pain. >Massie was at the forefront of the push for the release of the Epstein files, sparking a torrent of hate from the president.>The Trump critic has vowed to spend his final seven months in office continuing to push for transparency, after having joined Ro Khanna in naming billionaire Leon Black, banker Jes Staley, and businessman Leslie Wexner as three names originally redacted in the files—along with six others they described as “likely implicated” in Epstein’s orbit.
Yeah no shit. She was an Epstein girl and she met Trump through him.
>>1516682You're on a watch list now for saying that out loud.
>>1516686we are all still watching and waiting for the list
>>1516622https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pMyxFtSs1-4
>>1516689The Epstein Files Transparency Act, signed into law by Donald J. Trump in November 2025, requires the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) to publicly release all unclassified records, communications, and investigative materials related to the prosecution of Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell.The DOJ has published over 3.5 million pages of responsive documents, videos, and images in compliance with the act. How many of those 3.5 million pages did you read after getting what you were waiting for?
>>1516692every reference to Trump is blacked out. Explain that.In fact, explain why ANY names are blacked out on the list.
>>1516693That's not true thoughPeople said Trump's name are all over the files. Like when he talks about meeting with the Trump sons or going to Trumps for Thanksgiving
Massie losing has now allowed him all his time to do the podcast circuit and shout about releasing the Epstein files.
>>1516694The truth is they claimed the redacted names were victims, and then when some unredacted files were shown to contain names that were redacted that clearly weren’t victims they said nothing. If they aren’t hiding anything they don’t need to lie about anything. The 3.5m isn’t even most of the files apparently there’s 11m total.
>>1516705Look out for his book he's baiting you into buying.Going on podcasts hinting at shit is useless Democratshit.
>>1516706How does it make you feel that Democrats have access to the unredacted info and are withholding it?
>>1516716unsurprised. Pelosi had the whole report and just shelved it.
>>1516716I dunno. How does it feel to look at the entire government covering up a massive pedophile ring, and to be such a disingenuous dipshit you only blame the half you don't like?How is that a win? "Dems have access to the same files as the red re-res, and neither side releasing them somehow only reflects poorly on them.Fuck you shill.
>>1516716Feel? I think there’s a uniparty. Not all the members of both parties but enough of them, look at AIPAC funding across both sides and see how both sides treat Israel. This is all connected to Epstein of course.
>>1516715It’s not useless if it keeps the issue in the public consciousness.
>>1516721>blame the half you don't like?Because you still haven't woken up. You're parroting lefty talking points about the Epstein files while still needing the government to release them before the ramifications fully sink in.
>>1516721About as good as you trying to pin Epstein on Trump to win the midterms.
>>1516692The files have not been fully released.>Justice Department withheld and removed some Epstein files related to TrumpSource: https://www.npr.org/2026/02/24/nx-s1-5723968/epstein-files-trump-accusation-maxwell>Federal prosecutors had identified 6 million files that were ‘potentially responsive’ to the law, but only released 3.5. Why?Source: https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2026/jan/31/jeffrey-epstein-unreleased-files
>>1516716>How does it make you feel that Democrats have access to the unredacted info and are withholding it?>>1516717>>1516722>>1516721>>1516746Wrong.They don't have unrestricted access. They can only view it at a painstakingly slow pace.>Representatives Jamie Raskin, a Democrat, and Lauren Boebert, a Republican, were among the lawmakers who viewed the documents on Monday.>"I think there are folks who are definitely implicated" named in the files, Boebert said.>Raskin complained that the limited way in which lawmakers could view the unredacted files amounts to a "cover up".>"The DoJ is giving Members of Congress just four computers in a satellite office to read the unredacted Epstein File of more than 3 million documents," he wrote on X, calculating that it would take Congress seven years to read it all.https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cn5gzepnw4loThey aren't allowed to share them directly:>To access the files, lawmakers will need to give the Justice Department 24 hours’ notice. They will be able to review the files on computers at the Department of Justice. Only lawmakers, not their staff, will have access to the files, and they will be permitted to take notes, but not make electronic copies.https://apnews.com/article/epstein-files-congress-unredacted-justice-department-5219f89459e80a141b84e1aa2551b0d2
DOJ’s current process for congressional review makes meaningful oversight impossible. Members are only allowed to review documents on four DOJ computers located at a satellite office that is open only during business hours. At that pace, it would take more than seven years for Members to review even the limited set of files DOJ has made available.>https://jayapal.house.gov/2026/03/23/judiciary-oversight-democrats-demand-doj-take-5-steps-toward-epstein-file-transparency/
>>1516692>>1516693>>1516694>>1516706>>1516716>>1516721>>1516722>>1516746>>1516770You guys haven't ready any of the Epstein files. You are just getting your news from the media telling you what is in the files, you didn't read shit yourself.
>>1516774>They don't have unrestricted access.>Unredacted>Unrestricted>Fails to read>Complains about it.EOD they have access to the information. Therefore they're hiding it if it exists,
>>1516784Read the post above yours>Members are only allowed to review documents on four DOJ computers located at a satellite office that is open only during business hours. At that pace, it would take more than seven years for Members to review even the limited set of files DOJ has made available.That is not "unrestricted". There are hundreds of members of congress, yet only 4 computersThey don't even have all of the files there.
>>1516825Read my post here >>1516716And the restrictions likely exist to prevent abuse since they have access to the UNREDACTED files.
>>1516880so do you fuck kids too
>>1516716They have given info from the unredacted files:>The document in question was an email forward from Epstein to his associate, Ghislaine Maxwell, from 2009, which was just after the late billionaire's 2008 conviction on charges of procuring a child for prostitution and of soliciting a prostitute. The email exchange apparently recounted a conversation between lawyers for Epstein and Trump.>"Epstein's lawyers synopsized and quoted Trump as saying that Jeffrey Epstein was not a member of his club at Mar-a-Lago, but he was a guest at Mar-a-Lago, and he had never been asked to leave,https://people.com/jamie-raskin-unredacted-epstein-file-trump-claim-11903119different rep who viewed the unredacted files also said that trump didn't ban epstein from mar-a-lago:https://www.youtube.com/shorts/LKWuBea3bos
>>1516776Reddit is a reliable source chud.
>>1516911>different rep who viewed the unredacted files also said that trump didn't ban epstein from mar-a-lago:Yet Trump's DOJ ensured he was arrested and punished. Interesting.
>>1516915have you ever not lied
>>1516915they also reduced ghislaine maxwell's prison security
>>1516931Yet she's in prison. Interesting.
>>1516622how long till Israel suicides this guy?
>>1516759>win the midterms.The American people have lost every election for decades.You unironically support pedophiles, ironically kys
>>1516933If he dies mysteriously it will only make him seem more correct
