[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/news/ - Current News

Name
Options
Comment
Verification
4chan Pass users can bypass this verification. [Learn More] [Login]
  • Please read the Rules and FAQ before posting.

08/21/20New boards added: /vrpg/, /vmg/, /vst/ and /vm/
05/04/17New trial board added: /bant/ - International/Random
10/04/16New board for 4chan Pass users: /vip/ - Very Important Posts
[Hide] [Show All]


Janitor acceptance emails will be sent out over the coming weeks. Make sure to check your spam folder!


[Advertise on 4chan]


Three losses in one week for Trump. He only has two friends on the court now ... Thomas and Alito.

https://www.huffpost.com/entry/supreme-court-rules-on-birthright-citizenship_n_6a0f2eade4b0f1ba1f62e05b

The Supreme Court upheld the Constitution’s guarantee that those born in the United States are automatically U.S. citizens, rejecting President Donald Trump’s attempt to rewrite one of the most sacred laws in the U.S.

“Children born in the United States to parents unlawfully or temporarily present are ‘subject to the jurisdiction’ of the United States and are citizens at birth under the Fourteenth Amendment’s Citizenship Clause,” Chief Justice John Roberts wrote in the 6-3 ruling released Tuesday. Justice Brett Kavanaugh concurred in part. Justices Clarence Thomas, Samuel Alito and Neil Gorsuch dissented.

Citizenship, according to the chief justice, has been defined as having rights to “freely participate in our political community.”

“The Framers of the Fourteenth Amendment extended that promise to ‘every free-born person in this land.’ We keep that promise today,” he wrote.

The 14th Amendment states that “all persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the States wherein they reside.”
>>
>>1522085
>Barron: an anchor baby of the First Whore: an illegal immigrant
That's why hypocrites don't have the right to have political power, opinions, or social standing.
Two down, one to go in November: counting down to 20th January 2029 and the death of MAGA. Tick-tock, tick-tock, Trump & cultists.
>>
>>1522089
the ruling means nothing without enforcement. It is business as usual for ICE and no one will stop them from rounding up people and deporting them.

The courts are irrelevant and Trump knows it.
>>
>conservative woman with two adopted children from haiti opposes overturning birthright citizenship
Literally everything wrong with America.
>>
The ruling means everything for Trump's political credibility. After November it will be business as usual making rightards impotently seethe when Democrats dismantle everything that MAGA stands for, by denying the cultists' orange god of its right to any political power, and there'll be less than nothing that Trumptards will be able to do about it.
Trump is irrelevant and the SCOTUS know it.
>>
This was one of those cases where literally everyone who isn't a blind partisan knew what the outcome would be, whether they agreed with it or not
Anyone who was surprised by this needs to sit down and really look at the media they consume and ask if they're in an intellectual bubble
>>
>>1522091
>rounding up people and deporting them
He still thinks they are doing any of that. How cute.
>>
>The Supreme Court upheld Birthright Citizenship, which is too bad for our Country, but we can easily make it up in Congress through Legislation, with the support of the President, that has now been determined during this process. No long and unwieldy Constitutional Amendment is necessary! Congress should start TODAY to work on ending expensive and unfair to our Country, Birthright Citizenship. They will have my Complete and Total Support! President DONALD J. TRUMP
Oh please please PLEASE waste you last few months before midterms trying to ram through a bill that ignores the 14th amendment and will just be thrown out as unconstitutional immediately if it passes
>>
>>1522085
It's all falling apart for you and your cultists, Trumpy.
>>
>>1522098
The outcome was 5-4. There are a fuckton of blind partisans on the bench, so this decision was unfortunately very much in the air.
>>
>>1522118
it was 6-3
>>
>>1522114
humanity*
>>
>>1522122
>it was 6-3
The constitutional issue was 5-4. Kavanaugh held that the 14th Amendment doesn't guarantee birthright citizenship, but a separate law Congress had passed, and which could be much more easily gotten rid of, conferred citizenship to the people in question.

If 1 more justice had flipped the Constitutional issue would have gone the other way.

4 out of 9 of the members of SCOTUS were prepared to kill the 14th Amendment for partisan reasons.
>>
>>1522101
ICE has two flights a day out of my nearby regional airport. You are delusional if you think they ever stopped.
Worst thing is, you cannot enter their tailnumbers on FlightAware even though they are civilian airliners.

There were 296 "removal" flights just last month ... the most of any month since January '25.

https://www.humanrightsfirst.org/ice-flight-monitor
>>
>>1522129
>you cannot enter their tailnumbers on FlightAware even though they are civilian airliners
Yeah, because leftoids are obsessively stalking the travel paths of a federally regulated form of public transit. That's the kind of shit which puts you on a government watch list.
>>
>>1522134
>just let us run our concentration camps you mean leftists >:(
>>
>>1522129
>a trillion deportation flights every day
>muh human rights liberal propaganda source
migger please
>>
>>1522135
>concentration camps
Show me the camps anon.
>>
>>1522138
try to sneak into America. We'll show you.
>>
>>1522085
All this means is that we'll have to throw out the Constitution to get rid of the browns, which is probably what they wanted all along.
>>
ITT: MIGAs denying that which they were most proud of. Just like Germans in 1945.
>>
>2016
>Antonin Scalia eats himself to death in February
>Principled republicans squeal and howl and clutch their pearls that nine months before a presidential election is too close to seat a SC justice and that the will of the American people should be heard before starting the confirmation process
>2020
>Ruth Bader Ginsburg dies in mid September
>Those same principled republicans squeal "FUCK THE WILL OF THE PEOPLE" and ram Amy Coney Barrett through the confirmation process, seating her literally one week before the presidential election while early voting has already started
>2022
>Amy Coney Barrett is the 6th vote in a SCOTUS majority to overturn Roe v Wade, republicans squeal and celebrate. The ends have justified the slimy, unethical means and now all the fetuses will be safe
>2026
>The number of abortions per year is actually rising in America after a decade long decline before Roe v Wade was overturned
>Amy Coney Barrett votes against letting republicans throw out legal mail in ballots in an attempt to steal the 2026 midterms
>Amy Coney Barrett votes against the republican plan to completely ignore the 14th amendment
Watching the right get fisted up the ass by the monkey's paw they made a wish on to seat ACB has me at levels of schadenfreude that I didn't think were humanly possible
I hope Amy Coney Barrett lives to be 100
>>
>>1522144
>>The number of abortions per year is actually rising in America after a decade long decline before Roe v Wade was overturned
This is really the craziest part
With Roe v Wade they didn't ban abortion, but they were able to make it prohibitively expensive and unattainable for women living in red hellholes
But after the ban? That really kicked off mail order mifepristone
>>
>>1522144
>Cheering for brown people
Anon, do better.
>>
>>1522147
Why? You're the one who voted for this three times
>>
>>1522148
Because you should choose your own team.
>>
>>1522149
but we're not mediocre sex offenders
I'll stick with Team America, thank you
>>
>>1522149
Which team is helping out white people, in your estimation?
>>
>>1522144
I don't, she's an affront to Ruth Bader Ginsburg's legagy by doing everything to udnermine it, just like sexual harasser and fascist Clarence Thomas continues you destroy Thurmond Marshal's legacy

The faster the courts are fully reformed, the better off we'll be.
>>
>>1522150
>I'll stick with Team America
By siding with non-Americans?
>>
>>1522155
The United States Constitution says everyone born on US soil save for the children of foreign diplomats is an American citizen
The Supreme Court of the United States , which consists of nine justices nominated by the President of the United States and confirmed by the United States Senate, reiterated that today
If you're saying you're in opposition of the Constitution and SCOTUS, you are the anti-American one, my friend
>>
>>1522156
If I shit in the kitchen, does that make it food?
>>
>>1522157
If you had an actual point, you'd make it instead of trying to fall back on a weak metaphor
But you don't. You're just a seething anti-American loser who hates the Constitution and the institutions created by and to uphold the Constitution.
>>
>>1522155
>non-Americans?
You're just a bad AI script, aren't you ESL shill?
>>
>>1522163
The only thing you're telling me is that you would gladly eat shit if a legal expert told you it was food. You have the reasoning skills of a literal dog.
>>
>>1522169
And the only thing you're telling anyone is you despise the Constitution, SCOTUS, and a majority of the citizenry of the United States
Because you're a seething anti-American shill who only cares about your own easily manipulated feelings, which you believe outweigh every legal institution enshrined in the Constitution.
>>
>>1522172
They're a seething anti-American ESL shill who is projecting their programmed love of eating shit onto actual free Americans
lmao
>>
It's all falling apart for you and your cultists, Trumpy.
With no error in the original post >>1522114.
Those who worship Trump eat shit, but actual Americans would never think of doing so.
>>
>>1522085
>The Framers of the Fourteenth Amendment
That would be Reconstructionists, a.k.a. the new "founding fathers". Except these founders tore the country clean in half as part of its founding. You love to see it.

Peace,
>*clap*
love,
>*clap*
and unity, y'all!
>>
>esl shills pitiable third world education has them confusing the two sides of the civil war
>>
>>1522209
I'll bet your libtard DEI woke socialist education didn't even teach you about how Fort Sumter threw itself at those innocent Confederate cannonballs
>>
>>1522085
The Constitution really is a worthless piece of paper after all. Oh, well.
>>
>>1522209
>>1522210
The North and South actually swapped sides. It was called the Confederate strategy
https://www.independent.org/article/2021/11/22/the-new-blue-confederacy/
Why are progressive regions of the country—especially in the old major liberal cities (e.g., Chicago, Los Angeles, Minneapolis, New York, Portland, San Francisco, Seattle)—institutionalizing de facto racial quotas through “proportional representation” based on “disparate impact”? Why are they promoting ethnic and racial chauvinism, such as allowing college students to select the race of their own roommates, calibrating graduation ceremonies by skin color and tribe, segregating campus “safe spaces” by race, and banning literature that does not meet commissariat diktats?

Why are they turning into one-party political fiefdoms separating the rich and poor, increasingly resembling feudal societies as members of the middle class flee or disappear? What does it mean that they are becoming more and more intolerant in their cancel culture, and quasi-religious intolerance of dissent, on issues from climate change and abortion-on-demand to critical race theory and wokeness?

Isn’t it strange that there are entire states and regions wholly reliant on the money and power of “one-crop” Big Tech monopolies? And why, in the 21st century no less, are Democratic-controlled counties, cities, and entire states nullifying federal law?

In archetypal “states’ rights” fashion, blue-state “sanctuary cities” are as defiant of the federal government as the Old South was when it claimed immunity from federal jurisdiction—all the way from the nullification crisis of 1830-1833 to George Wallace in 1963 blocking the door at the University of Alabama
>>
>>1522218
why is your shift so late? all the americans are going to bed soon
>>
>>1522085
>political community
Where does the Constitution define this very dystopian-sounding abstraction? I'd hate to accuse Roberts of pulling it entirely out of his arse.
>>
>>1522220
apparently you'd hate to get a real job too
>>
>>1522221
Yeah, and?
>>
>>1522219
If you won't respond to the body of my comment why should I respond to yours?
Ask yourself: in the decades following the conclusion of the Civil War in April 1865, how might the reunited American public have answered the following hypothetical questions:

One-hundred-fifty-six years from now, in the year 2021, where in the United States will Americans most likely discriminate on the basis of race?
Where will citizens squabble over the racial percentages of ancestral bloodlines, and schools admit or reject students in part on the DNA of an applicant?
Where will free speech and expression become most endangered?
Where will states’ rights boosters deny federal officers the right to enforce federal law?
Where will the major cities be the most unsafe and the middle classes the most embattled? And from which regions of the country will people flee, and to which will they migrate?
Of course, in the century-and-a-half since the end of the Civil War, we have become in a certain sense a homogenizing country. Gender studies programs at, say, the University of Texas are not that much different from those at Yale. The same types of homeless are found in downtown Atlanta as well as in San Francisco.

But there is a growing red state/blue state divide—encompassing an economic, cultural, social, and political totality. The public seems to sense that the blue-state model is the more hysterically neo-Confederate, and the red state the calmer and more Union-like. The former appears more unsustainable and intolerant, the latter is increasingly more livable and welcoming.

The people themselves are voting with their U-Hauls. They are fleeing New York, Chicago, Los Angeles or San Francisco
>>
>>1522222
I think he's going to call you an ESL shill only posting here for a paycheck. I wonder what the motivation of the guy calling everyone else ESL shills is. What does he get out of it?
>>
>>1522223
if you think i can take your article seriously, then you can't be taken seriously
>>
>>1522085
The constitution literally couldn't be any clearer on this subject, how the fuck did THREE judges dissent?
>>
>>1522094
You tried that last time. It didn't work out well.
>>
>>1522230
One could be forgiven for thinking that illegals weren't subject to American jurisdiction based on the years that federal judges spent shoo-ing them out the back of the courthouse with no punitive consequences for anyone involved. Maybe you'll get the satisfaction of having literally everyone agree with your point of view next time nonetheless.
>>
>tfw the highest court in the land rules that a baby born from the result of Tijuana donkey show has the same legal claim to citizenship as you so long as its born on American soil
>>
>>1522085
This never should have come before the court in the first place.
>All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside. No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.
That's the 14th Amendment. If you're born here, you're a citizen, period. There is no debate to be had, there is interpretation you could use to say otherwise, that's what it says. That these fascist freaks even entertained the possibility of overruling the fucking constitution is proof of how far we've fallen, how bad it's gotten, and everyone who voted in favor of doing so needs to be impeached immediately. America has no future with these people running it.
>>
>>1522230
Because they're traitors to this country and actively want to end our democracy.

>>1522247
Yup. Been that way since 1868 and it better fucking stay that way.
>>
>>1522259
Not for you to say.

>>1522260
>and it better fucking stay that way.
Or else what?
>>
>>1522277
>Not for you to say.
It is, actually, because I can fucking read and that is what these words mean.
>b-b-but the supreme court gets to-
No they fucking don't. Interpreting the constitution does not mean ignoring the constitution.
>>
>>1522259
>That's the 14th Amendment.
>overruling the fucking constitution
>Amendment

So, uh... I am in favor of the 14th Amendment. We're on the same side here.

I just think claiming it's good because it's in the constitution is circular reasoning, and we should believe and argue positions for good reasons, not just because they're old.

That said, these people have made life drastically worse for all of us; control needs to be wrestled away from them ASAP, and a ton of them need prison time for their naked corruption.
>>
>>1522279
Not really, fag.

>and it better fucking stay that way.
Or else what?
>>
>>1522285
>That said, these people have made life drastically worse for all of us; control needs to be wrestled away from them ASAP, and a ton of them need prison time for their naked corruption.
Illegals and Democrats are pretty terrible.
>>
Cultists tried that in 2020. It didn't work out well, 1522236
>2024
It's not working out two years later. Five months from now, it won't work out when there's a Democrat-led Senate & HoR, and Trump & the Republicans can do nothing, then two years from now MAGA is dead. It'll never work out for rightards after that.
You can try, but it'll never work out again, cultists.
The SCOTUS prove your opinions wrong. If you think you know better than them, why aren't you a member of the SCOTUS? The fact you're a nothing that never passed the bar exam means there never was a debate or the US would be exactly as you would want it to be. But it isn't. And never will be. Your opinions & interpretations will always be wrong. You & your eternally wrong opinions have no future because of that 250-year old piece of paper and the SCOTUS who will always prove your opinions more than wrong.
>the orange thing that loaded the SCOTUS to its advantage: only for that to blow up in its own face.
And here you are now, with a SCOTUS you don't like. You voted for this, 1522259
>This never should have
If wishes were currency, you would be homeless and starving. Your wrong opinions have & always will be impeached. The likes of you will never have a future. Good.
An orange thing married to the First Whore - an illegal - and Republicans are always terrible
>>
>>1522292
Dems are, that's why they're getting buttfucked in elections by social dems time and again. Illegals are a negative tax burden.

I think the adjudicated rapist pedotus enriching himself by billions is doing a bit more damage though.
>>
>>1522316
>that's why they're getting buttfucked in elections by social dems time and again
Four or five primaries out of 31 primaries Dems have had this year. All in deep, deep, blue districts.

>the adjudicated rapist
No Court has found him guilty of "rape", which is a criminal offence and requires a specific jury charge and finding of fact by a jury.
>>
>>1522324
don't rape anyone ok esl shill
>>
>>1522324
Trump is a rapist, and in the english language that means that they have raped.

You're welcome for the free english lesson
>>
>>1522327
Carrol v. Trump
>Jury answered "No" to whether Carroll proved, by a preponderance of evidence, that Trump raped her.
>Jury answered "Yes" that Trump sexually abused her.
Confirmed on appeal by the Second Circuit.

I get it, you're not particularly well educated so these things are hard for you. But you really should try do some reading before you flap your cock-holster, it will save you the humiliation.
>>
>>1522329
do you have to insert your repressed homosexuality into every post, esl shill
>>
>>1522329
If you sexually abuse someone against their will, what does that make you?

I'll give you a hint:

Rape: any sexual activity, with or without penetration, that takes place without the consent of one of the people involved.

Whats the english word for someone who commits rape? Its not hard ESL shill, the answers in this thread.
>>
>>1522334
You said he was an "adjudicated" rapist. That statement is 100% false. The Jury ruled that he did not rape Carrol.
>>
>>1522334
>Rape: any sexual activity, with or without penetration, that takes place without the consent of one of the people involved.
Thats not the definition of rape.
>>
>>1522335
You seem very invested in claiming Trump doesn't meet the criminal definition of rape despite clearly meeting societal definitions of rape.
And thats fine, because your'e a shill paid to defend billionaire pedophiles.
But Trump is definitively a rapist. Sorry, you already lost.


>>1522337
Thats an easy BTFO: https://www.dictionary.com/browse/rape
>>
>>1522340
>make untrue statement
>homg you're so invested in pointing out the statement is untrue!
Why are you so invested in defending an untrue statement?

>Thats an easy BTFO:
>https://www.dictionary.com/browse/rape
Yes, look at the first definition (which you ignored)
>unlawful sexual intercourse or any other sexual penetration of the vagina, anus, or mouth of another person, with or without force, by a sex organ, other body part, or foreign object, without the consent of the person subjected to such penetration.

Which matches the legal standard applied in the case: New York Penal Law § 130.35

I think we're dealing with an IQ problem here.
>>
>>1522342
you sure have a humiliating life
>>
So sad this wasn't a 8-1 decision upholding birthright citizenship.

(Clarence Thomas doesn't even pretend anymore)
>>
>>1522343
Its a good thing for them all the negative meanings for humiliation are in the second definition so they can ignore that
>>
>>1522343
>>1522346
>gets btfo
>starts samefagging
Many such cases. SAD!
>>
So what did establishing that Trump is definitively a rapist mean for this thread anyway?
That he's shitting out anchor babies?
There's other threads about his other rape cases going through the justice system
>>
>>1522347
you're projecting again
>>
>>1522342
No,.everyone stop, the retarded shill is technically right, and admitting when we're wrong is the difference between us and them. Trump didn't legally rape E Jean Caroll, he only raped her colloquially, legally he just sexually assaulted her and defamed her.

So trump isn't an adjudicated rapist, he's an adjudicated sex offender. Congrats.

Now, do you realize defending the technical difference between a rapist and a sex offender makes you look about as good as defending the difference between a pedophile and an ehebephile?

Congrats, you fought so hard for that win to defend a pedophile rapist. I hope being technically correct feels good you fascist faggot.
>>
>>1522356
>he's an adjudicated sex offender
He's not an adjudicated sex offender either. That's a criminal offence, this was a civil trial.

>defend a pedophile rapist
You just concede that he is not a rapist, and you're adding a new accusation that he is a pedo? Someone is the BIG MAD xd
>>
>>1522358
He didn't meet the legal definition of being a rapist in the E Jean Carol case. That doesn't mean he's that he's not a rapist.

If you're big mad, take some deep breaths.

He admits to being a pedophile, he brags about watching underage girls dressing in pageants, and says creepy things to underage girls constantly.

You're right, he's not an adjudicated sex offender either, he's immune from criminal prosecution.

This would be like if there was a bowl of shit on the counter, and someone told you it was oatmeal. You just took a big spoonful and are smacking it around in your mouth. "Nope, it's just shit!" "Are you sure it isn't cereal? I think it's cereal!" *takes another bite*"Nope, stupid liggeral miggeral figgeral, it's JUST shit."
>>
>>1522361
>That doesn't mean he's that he's not a rapist.
Jury found that he is not a rapist.

>He admits to being a pedophile
No, he does not.

>this would be like...
This would be like you saying some stupid shit and me correcting you, followed by you being upset about being corrected.
>>
>>1522363
do you really defend billionaire rapist pedophiles for free
>>
>>1522366
>correcting the ignorant shit you say
>defending anyone
If you want an echo chamber maybe you should go back to r*ddit.
>>
>>1522369
because it's pretty bizarre. how did you end up in this position?
>>
>>1522363
>Jury him liable for sexual assault and defamation, but he didn't meet the strict legal definition of rape.

Cool, let's look at technical terms, and not focus on his disgusting actions.

>No, he does not.
Oh, sorry, you're right again, he admits to being an ehebephile, what an important distinction.

How's the shit taste?
>>
>>1522371
Its bizarre that you would say some incorrect shit and someone would say "anon, that statement is incorrect"?

>>1522372
>Cool, let's look at technical terms
Yes, the initial statement relied on technical language saying he is an "adjudicated rapist". The statement is wholly incorrect.

>he admits to being an ehebephile
He does not.
>>
Half the thread is now off-topic garbage being posted by people that are most likely ban-evading.

>Here's why that's a good thing.
>>
>>1522375
remind us, did trump (rapist) say

>“I’m automatically attracted to beautiful women — I just start kissing them, it’s like a magnet. Just kiss. I don’t even wait. And when you’re a star, they let you do it. You can do anything"

or not
>>
>>1522260
We didn't vote to let browns in, you absolute faggot. People had to be forced at literal gunpoint to allow minorities to have rights and representation here.

If democracy were working as intended, we would have been allowed to kill everyone south of a California Tan in America.
>>
>We
non american shill thinks this is proof, or something
>>
>>1522085
The same MSM that wants to convince us that the US lost against Iran also wants us to believe that Trump lost 3 times in a week. We all know they're lying. They know they're lying. fuck the left, fuck Israel, and fuck the MSM
>>
>>1522382
get a real job esl shill
>>
>>1522378
>We didn't vote
I know.
>>
>We
Hi, foreign esl shill 1522378 that will never vote in USA because you're not American.



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.