View Announcement
Janitor acceptance emails will be sent out over the coming weeks. Make sure to check your spam folder!
Anonymous Supreme Court Upholds Birthrig(...) 06/30/26(Tue)12:24:16 No. 1522085 Three losses in one week for Trump. He only has two friends on the court now ... Thomas and Alito. https://www.huffpost.com/entry/supreme-court-rules-on-birthright-citizenship_n_6a0f2eade4b0f1ba1f62e05b The Supreme Court upheld the Constitution’s guarantee that those born in the United States are automatically U.S. citizens, rejecting President Donald Trump’s attempt to rewrite one of the most sacred laws in the U.S. “Children born in the United States to parents unlawfully or temporarily present are ‘subject to the jurisdiction’ of the United States and are citizens at birth under the Fourteenth Amendment’s Citizenship Clause,” Chief Justice John Roberts wrote in the 6-3 ruling released Tuesday. Justice Brett Kavanaugh concurred in part. Justices Clarence Thomas, Samuel Alito and Neil Gorsuch dissented. Citizenship, according to the chief justice, has been defined as having rights to “freely participate in our political community.” “The Framers of the Fourteenth Amendment extended that promise to ‘every free-born person in this land.’ We keep that promise today,” he wrote. The 14th Amendment states that “all persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the States wherein they reside.” >>
Anonymous 06/30/26(Tue)12:42:29 No. 1522089 >>1522085 >Barron: an anchor baby of the First Whore: an illegal immigrant That's why hypocrites don't have the right to have political power, opinions, or social standing. Two down, one to go in November: counting down to 20th January 2029 and the death of MAGA. Tick-tock, tick-tock, Trump & cultists.>>
Anonymous 06/30/26(Tue)12:49:33 No. 1522091 >>1522089 the ruling means nothing without enforcement. It is business as usual for ICE and no one will stop them from rounding up people and deporting them. The courts are irrelevant and Trump knows it.>>
Anonymous 06/30/26(Tue)13:01:00 No. 1522093 >conservative woman with two adopted children from haiti opposes overturning birthright citizenship Literally everything wrong with America.>>
Anonymous 06/30/26(Tue)13:08:22 No. 1522094 The ruling means everything for Trump's political credibility. After November it will be business as usual making rightards impotently seethe when Democrats dismantle everything that MAGA stands for, by denying the cultists' orange god of its right to any political power, and there'll be less than nothing that Trumptards will be able to do about it. Trump is irrelevant and the SCOTUS know it. >>
Anonymous 06/30/26(Tue)13:22:31 No. 1522098 This was one of those cases where literally everyone who isn't a blind partisan knew what the outcome would be, whether they agreed with it or not Anyone who was surprised by this needs to sit down and really look at the media they consume and ask if they're in an intellectual bubble >>
Anonymous 06/30/26(Tue)13:29:59 No. 1522101 >>1522091 >rounding up people and deporting them He still thinks they are doing any of that. How cute.>>
Anonymous 06/30/26(Tue)13:44:24 No. 1522107 >The Supreme Court upheld Birthright Citizenship, which is too bad for our Country, but we can easily make it up in Congress through Legislation, with the support of the President, that has now been determined during this process. No long and unwieldy Constitutional Amendment is necessary! Congress should start TODAY to work on ending expensive and unfair to our Country, Birthright Citizenship. They will have my Complete and Total Support! President DONALD J. TRUMP Oh please please PLEASE waste you last few months before midterms trying to ram through a bill that ignores the 14th amendment and will just be thrown out as unconstitutional immediately if it passes>>
Anonymous 06/30/26(Tue)14:17:39 No. 1522114 >>1522085 It's all falling apart for you and your cultists, Trumpy.>>
Anonymous 06/30/26(Tue)14:27:43 No. 1522118 >>1522098 The outcome was 5-4. There are a fuckton of blind partisans on the bench, so this decision was unfortunately very much in the air.>>
Anonymous 06/30/26(Tue)14:54:13 No. 1522122 >>1522118 it was 6-3>>
Anonymous 06/30/26(Tue)14:59:21 No. 1522123 >>1522114 humanity*>>
Anonymous 06/30/26(Tue)15:31:48 No. 1522125 >>1522122 >it was 6-3 The constitutional issue was 5-4. Kavanaugh held that the 14th Amendment doesn't guarantee birthright citizenship, but a separate law Congress had passed, and which could be much more easily gotten rid of, conferred citizenship to the people in question. If 1 more justice had flipped the Constitutional issue would have gone the other way. 4 out of 9 of the members of SCOTUS were prepared to kill the 14th Amendment for partisan reasons.>>
Anonymous 06/30/26(Tue)15:57:35 No. 1522129 >>1522101 ICE has two flights a day out of my nearby regional airport. You are delusional if you think they ever stopped. Worst thing is, you cannot enter their tailnumbers on FlightAware even though they are civilian airliners. There were 296 "removal" flights just last month ... the most of any month since January '25. https://www.humanrightsfirst.org/ice-flight-monitor >>
Anonymous 06/30/26(Tue)16:33:03 No. 1522134 >>1522129 >you cannot enter their tailnumbers on FlightAware even though they are civilian airliners Yeah, because leftoids are obsessively stalking the travel paths of a federally regulated form of public transit. That's the kind of shit which puts you on a government watch list.>>
Anonymous 06/30/26(Tue)16:47:09 No. 1522135 >>1522134 >just let us run our concentration camps you mean leftists >:( >>
Anonymous 06/30/26(Tue)16:49:18 No. 1522136 >>1522129 >a trillion deportation flights every day >muh human rights liberal propaganda source migger please>>
Anonymous 06/30/26(Tue)17:00:07 No. 1522138 >>1522135 >concentration camps Show me the camps anon.>>
Anonymous 06/30/26(Tue)17:02:34 No. 1522139 >>1522138 try to sneak into America. We'll show you.>>
Anonymous 06/30/26(Tue)17:15:01 No. 1522140 >>1522085 All this means is that we'll have to throw out the Constitution to get rid of the browns, which is probably what they wanted all along.>>
Anonymous 06/30/26(Tue)17:21:09 No. 1522141 ITT: MIGAs denying that which they were most proud of. Just like Germans in 1945. >>
Anonymous 06/30/26(Tue)17:31:32 No. 1522144 >2016 >Antonin Scalia eats himself to death in February >Principled republicans squeal and howl and clutch their pearls that nine months before a presidential election is too close to seat a SC justice and that the will of the American people should be heard before starting the confirmation process >2020 >Ruth Bader Ginsburg dies in mid September >Those same principled republicans squeal "FUCK THE WILL OF THE PEOPLE" and ram Amy Coney Barrett through the confirmation process, seating her literally one week before the presidential election while early voting has already started >2022 >Amy Coney Barrett is the 6th vote in a SCOTUS majority to overturn Roe v Wade, republicans squeal and celebrate. The ends have justified the slimy, unethical means and now all the fetuses will be safe >2026 >The number of abortions per year is actually rising in America after a decade long decline before Roe v Wade was overturned >Amy Coney Barrett votes against letting republicans throw out legal mail in ballots in an attempt to steal the 2026 midterms >Amy Coney Barrett votes against the republican plan to completely ignore the 14th amendment Watching the right get fisted up the ass by the monkey's paw they made a wish on to seat ACB has me at levels of schadenfreude that I didn't think were humanly possible I hope Amy Coney Barrett lives to be 100>>
Anonymous 06/30/26(Tue)17:36:09 No. 1522145 >>1522144 >>The number of abortions per year is actually rising in America after a decade long decline before Roe v Wade was overturned This is really the craziest part With Roe v Wade they didn't ban abortion, but they were able to make it prohibitively expensive and unattainable for women living in red hellholes But after the ban? That really kicked off mail order mifepristone>>
Anonymous 06/30/26(Tue)17:44:51 No. 1522147 >>1522144 >Cheering for brown people Anon, do better.>>
Anonymous 06/30/26(Tue)17:57:33 No. 1522148 >>1522147 Why? You're the one who voted for this three times>>
Anonymous 06/30/26(Tue)18:11:10 No. 1522149 >>1522148 Because you should choose your own team.>>
Anonymous 06/30/26(Tue)18:13:19 No. 1522150 >>1522149 but we're not mediocre sex offenders I'll stick with Team America, thank you>>
Anonymous 06/30/26(Tue)18:15:36 No. 1522151 >>1522149 Which team is helping out white people, in your estimation?>>
Anonymous 06/30/26(Tue)18:21:46 No. 1522152 >>1522144 I don't, she's an affront to Ruth Bader Ginsburg's legagy by doing everything to udnermine it, just like sexual harasser and fascist Clarence Thomas continues you destroy Thurmond Marshal's legacy The faster the courts are fully reformed, the better off we'll be.>>
Anonymous 06/30/26(Tue)18:28:59 No. 1522155 >>1522150 >I'll stick with Team America By siding with non-Americans?>>
Anonymous 06/30/26(Tue)18:35:28 No. 1522156 >>1522155 The United States Constitution says everyone born on US soil save for the children of foreign diplomats is an American citizen The Supreme Court of the United States , which consists of nine justices nominated by the President of the United States and confirmed by the United States Senate, reiterated that today If you're saying you're in opposition of the Constitution and SCOTUS, you are the anti-American one, my friend>>
Anonymous 06/30/26(Tue)18:41:31 No. 1522157 >>1522156 If I shit in the kitchen, does that make it food?>>
Anonymous 06/30/26(Tue)18:50:02 No. 1522163 >>1522157 If you had an actual point, you'd make it instead of trying to fall back on a weak metaphor But you don't. You're just a seething anti-American loser who hates the Constitution and the institutions created by and to uphold the Constitution.>>
Anonymous 06/30/26(Tue)19:07:38 No. 1522167 >>1522155 >non-Americans? You're just a bad AI script, aren't you ESL shill?>>
Anonymous 06/30/26(Tue)19:18:15 No. 1522169 >>1522163 The only thing you're telling me is that you would gladly eat shit if a legal expert told you it was food. You have the reasoning skills of a literal dog.>>
Anonymous 06/30/26(Tue)19:24:18 No. 1522172 >>1522169 And the only thing you're telling anyone is you despise the Constitution, SCOTUS, and a majority of the citizenry of the United States Because you're a seething anti-American shill who only cares about your own easily manipulated feelings, which you believe outweigh every legal institution enshrined in the Constitution.>>
Anonymous 06/30/26(Tue)19:28:33 No. 1522173 >>1522172 They're a seething anti-American ESL shill who is projecting their programmed love of eating shit onto actual free Americans lmao>>
Anonymous 06/30/26(Tue)20:39:24 No. 1522185 It's all falling apart for you and your cultists, Trumpy. With no error in the original post >>1522114 . Those who worship Trump eat shit, but actual Americans would never think of doing so. >>
Anonymous 06/30/26(Tue)22:18:35 No. 1522208 >>1522085 >The Framers of the Fourteenth Amendment That would be Reconstructionists, a.k.a. the new "founding fathers". Except these founders tore the country clean in half as part of its founding. You love to see it. Peace, >*clap* love, >*clap* and unity, y'all!>>
Anonymous 06/30/26(Tue)22:20:43 No. 1522209 >esl shills pitiable third world education has them confusing the two sides of the civil war >>
Anonymous 06/30/26(Tue)22:27:06 No. 1522210 >>1522209 I'll bet your libtard DEI woke socialist education didn't even teach you about how Fort Sumter threw itself at those innocent Confederate cannonballs>>
Anonymous 06/30/26(Tue)22:38:37 No. 1522211 >>1522085 The Constitution really is a worthless piece of paper after all. Oh, well.>>
Anonymous 06/30/26(Tue)23:14:34 No. 1522218 >>1522209 >>1522210 The North and South actually swapped sides. It was called the Confederate strategy https://www.independent.org/article/2021/11/22/the-new-blue-confederacy/ Why are progressive regions of the country—especially in the old major liberal cities (e.g., Chicago, Los Angeles, Minneapolis, New York, Portland, San Francisco, Seattle)—institutionalizing de facto racial quotas through “proportional representation” based on “disparate impact”? Why are they promoting ethnic and racial chauvinism, such as allowing college students to select the race of their own roommates, calibrating graduation ceremonies by skin color and tribe, segregating campus “safe spaces” by race, and banning literature that does not meet commissariat diktats? Why are they turning into one-party political fiefdoms separating the rich and poor, increasingly resembling feudal societies as members of the middle class flee or disappear? What does it mean that they are becoming more and more intolerant in their cancel culture, and quasi-religious intolerance of dissent, on issues from climate change and abortion-on-demand to critical race theory and wokeness? Isn’t it strange that there are entire states and regions wholly reliant on the money and power of “one-crop” Big Tech monopolies? And why, in the 21st century no less, are Democratic-controlled counties, cities, and entire states nullifying federal law? In archetypal “states’ rights” fashion, blue-state “sanctuary cities” are as defiant of the federal government as the Old South was when it claimed immunity from federal jurisdiction—all the way from the nullification crisis of 1830-1833 to George Wallace in 1963 blocking the door at the University of Alabama >>
Anonymous 06/30/26(Tue)23:17:46 No. 1522219 >>1522218 why is your shift so late? all the americans are going to bed soon>>
Anonymous 06/30/26(Tue)23:26:45 No. 1522220 >>1522085 >political community Where does the Constitution define this very dystopian-sounding abstraction? I'd hate to accuse Roberts of pulling it entirely out of his arse.>>
Anonymous 06/30/26(Tue)23:30:33 No. 1522221 >>1522220 apparently you'd hate to get a real job too>>
Anonymous 06/30/26(Tue)23:31:03 No. 1522222 >>1522221 Yeah, and?>>
Anonymous 06/30/26(Tue)23:34:15 No. 1522223 >>1522219 If you won't respond to the body of my comment why should I respond to yours? Ask yourself: in the decades following the conclusion of the Civil War in April 1865, how might the reunited American public have answered the following hypothetical questions: One-hundred-fifty-six years from now, in the year 2021, where in the United States will Americans most likely discriminate on the basis of race? Where will citizens squabble over the racial percentages of ancestral bloodlines, and schools admit or reject students in part on the DNA of an applicant? Where will free speech and expression become most endangered? Where will states’ rights boosters deny federal officers the right to enforce federal law? Where will the major cities be the most unsafe and the middle classes the most embattled? And from which regions of the country will people flee, and to which will they migrate? Of course, in the century-and-a-half since the end of the Civil War, we have become in a certain sense a homogenizing country. Gender studies programs at, say, the University of Texas are not that much different from those at Yale. The same types of homeless are found in downtown Atlanta as well as in San Francisco. But there is a growing red state/blue state divide—encompassing an economic, cultural, social, and political totality. The public seems to sense that the blue-state model is the more hysterically neo-Confederate, and the red state the calmer and more Union-like. The former appears more unsustainable and intolerant, the latter is increasingly more livable and welcoming. The people themselves are voting with their U-Hauls. They are fleeing New York, Chicago, Los Angeles or San Francisco>>
Anonymous 06/30/26(Tue)23:36:07 No. 1522224 >>1522222 I think he's going to call you an ESL shill only posting here for a paycheck. I wonder what the motivation of the guy calling everyone else ESL shills is. What does he get out of it?>>
Anonymous 06/30/26(Tue)23:39:37 No. 1522225 >>1522223 if you think i can take your article seriously, then you can't be taken seriously>>
Anonymous 07/01/26(Wed)00:44:59 No. 1522230 >>1522085 The constitution literally couldn't be any clearer on this subject, how the fuck did THREE judges dissent?>>
Sage 07/01/26(Wed)01:00:39 No. 1522236 >>1522094 You tried that last time. It didn't work out well.>>
Anonymous 07/01/26(Wed)01:03:14 No. 1522238 >>1522230 One could be forgiven for thinking that illegals weren't subject to American jurisdiction based on the years that federal judges spent shoo-ing them out the back of the courthouse with no punitive consequences for anyone involved. Maybe you'll get the satisfaction of having literally everyone agree with your point of view next time nonetheless.>>
Anonymous 07/01/26(Wed)01:15:03 No. 1522247 >tfw the highest court in the land rules that a baby born from the result of Tijuana donkey show has the same legal claim to citizenship as you so long as its born on American soil >>
Anonymous 07/01/26(Wed)02:03:06 No. 1522259 >>1522085 This never should have come before the court in the first place. >All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside. No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws. That's the 14th Amendment. If you're born here, you're a citizen, period. There is no debate to be had, there is interpretation you could use to say otherwise, that's what it says. That these fascist freaks even entertained the possibility of overruling the fucking constitution is proof of how far we've fallen, how bad it's gotten, and everyone who voted in favor of doing so needs to be impeached immediately. America has no future with these people running it.>>
Anonymous 07/01/26(Wed)02:05:51 No. 1522260 >>1522230 Because they're traitors to this country and actively want to end our democracy.>>1522247 Yup. Been that way since 1868 and it better fucking stay that way.>>
Anonymous 07/01/26(Wed)06:21:11 No. 1522277 >>1522259 Not for you to say.>>1522260 >and it better fucking stay that way. Or else what?>>
Anonymous 07/01/26(Wed)06:25:15 No. 1522279 >>1522277 >Not for you to say. It is, actually, because I can fucking read and that is what these words mean. >b-b-but the supreme court gets to- No they fucking don't. Interpreting the constitution does not mean ignoring the constitution.>>
Anonymous 07/01/26(Wed)06:52:09 No. 1522285 >>1522259 >That's the 14th Amendment. >overruling the fucking constitution >Amendment So, uh... I am in favor of the 14th Amendment. We're on the same side here. I just think claiming it's good because it's in the constitution is circular reasoning, and we should believe and argue positions for good reasons, not just because they're old. That said, these people have made life drastically worse for all of us; control needs to be wrestled away from them ASAP, and a ton of them need prison time for their naked corruption.>>
Anonymous 07/01/26(Wed)06:59:00 No. 1522286 >>1522279 Not really, fag. >and it better fucking stay that way. Or else what?>>
Anonymous 07/01/26(Wed)08:06:31 No. 1522292 >>1522285 >That said, these people have made life drastically worse for all of us; control needs to be wrestled away from them ASAP, and a ton of them need prison time for their naked corruption. Illegals and Democrats are pretty terrible.>>
Anonymous 07/01/26(Wed)09:58:55 No. 1522302 Cultists tried that in 2020. It didn't work out well, 1522236>2024 It's not working out two years later. Five months from now, it won't work out when there's a Democrat-led Senate & HoR, and Trump & the Republicans can do nothing, then two years from now MAGA is dead. It'll never work out for rightards after that. You can try, but it'll never work out again, cultists. The SCOTUS prove your opinions wrong. If you think you know better than them, why aren't you a member of the SCOTUS? The fact you're a nothing that never passed the bar exam means there never was a debate or the US would be exactly as you would want it to be. But it isn't. And never will be. Your opinions & interpretations will always be wrong. You & your eternally wrong opinions have no future because of that 250-year old piece of paper and the SCOTUS who will always prove your opinions more than wrong.>the orange thing that loaded the SCOTUS to its advantage: only for that to blow up in its own face. And here you are now, with a SCOTUS you don't like. You voted for this, 1522259>This never should have If wishes were currency, you would be homeless and starving. Your wrong opinions have & always will be impeached. The likes of you will never have a future. Good. An orange thing married to the First Whore - an illegal - and Republicans are always terrible >>
Anonymous 07/01/26(Wed)12:23:59 No. 1522316 >>1522292 Dems are, that's why they're getting buttfucked in elections by social dems time and again. Illegals are a negative tax burden. I think the adjudicated rapist pedotus enriching himself by billions is doing a bit more damage though.>>
Anonymous 07/01/26(Wed)12:49:04 No. 1522324 >>1522316 >that's why they're getting buttfucked in elections by social dems time and again Four or five primaries out of 31 primaries Dems have had this year. All in deep, deep, blue districts. >the adjudicated rapist No Court has found him guilty of "rape", which is a criminal offence and requires a specific jury charge and finding of fact by a jury.>>
Anonymous 07/01/26(Wed)12:52:11 No. 1522325 >>1522324 don't rape anyone ok esl shill>>
Anonymous 07/01/26(Wed)12:54:51 No. 1522327 >>1522324 Trump is a rapist, and in the english language that means that they have raped. You're welcome for the free english lesson>>
Anonymous 07/01/26(Wed)12:59:38 No. 1522329 >>1522327 Carrol v. Trump >Jury answered "No" to whether Carroll proved, by a preponderance of evidence, that Trump raped her. >Jury answered "Yes" that Trump sexually abused her. Confirmed on appeal by the Second Circuit. I get it, you're not particularly well educated so these things are hard for you. But you really should try do some reading before you flap your cock-holster, it will save you the humiliation.>>
Anonymous 07/01/26(Wed)13:07:07 No. 1522330 >>1522329 do you have to insert your repressed homosexuality into every post, esl shill>>
Anonymous 07/01/26(Wed)13:16:25 No. 1522334 >>1522329 If you sexually abuse someone against their will, what does that make you? I'll give you a hint: Rape: any sexual activity, with or without penetration, that takes place without the consent of one of the people involved. Whats the english word for someone who commits rape? Its not hard ESL shill, the answers in this thread.>>
Anonymous 07/01/26(Wed)13:18:54 No. 1522335 >>1522334 You said he was an "adjudicated" rapist. That statement is 100% false. The Jury ruled that he did not rape Carrol.>>
Anonymous 07/01/26(Wed)13:19:55 No. 1522337 >>1522334 >Rape: any sexual activity, with or without penetration, that takes place without the consent of one of the people involved. Thats not the definition of rape.>>
Anonymous 07/01/26(Wed)13:23:21 No. 1522340 >>1522335 You seem very invested in claiming Trump doesn't meet the criminal definition of rape despite clearly meeting societal definitions of rape. And thats fine, because your'e a shill paid to defend billionaire pedophiles. But Trump is definitively a rapist. Sorry, you already lost. >>1522337 Thats an easy BTFO: https://www.dictionary.com/browse/rape >>
Anonymous 07/01/26(Wed)13:26:33 No. 1522342 >>1522340 >make untrue statement >homg you're so invested in pointing out the statement is untrue! Why are you so invested in defending an untrue statement? >Thats an easy BTFO: >https://www.dictionary.com/browse/rape Yes, look at the first definition (which you ignored) >unlawful sexual intercourse or any other sexual penetration of the vagina, anus, or mouth of another person, with or without force, by a sex organ, other body part, or foreign object, without the consent of the person subjected to such penetration. Which matches the legal standard applied in the case: New York Penal Law § 130.35 I think we're dealing with an IQ problem here.>>
Anonymous 07/01/26(Wed)13:30:15 No. 1522343 >>1522342 you sure have a humiliating life>>
Clarence Crack Corn & ise Don (...) 07/01/26(Wed)13:31:14 No. 1522344 So sad this wasn't a 8-1 decision upholding birthright citizenship. (Clarence Thomas doesn't even pretend anymore) >>
Anonymous 07/01/26(Wed)13:35:11 No. 1522346 >>1522343 Its a good thing for them all the negative meanings for humiliation are in the second definition so they can ignore that>>
Anonymous 07/01/26(Wed)13:38:33 No. 1522347 >>1522343 >>1522346 >gets btfo >starts samefagging Many such cases. SAD!>>
Anonymous 07/01/26(Wed)13:44:13 No. 1522352 So what did establishing that Trump is definitively a rapist mean for this thread anyway? That he's shitting out anchor babies? There's other threads about his other rape cases going through the justice system >>
Anonymous 07/01/26(Wed)13:44:20 No. 1522353 >>1522347 you're projecting again>>
Anonymous 07/01/26(Wed)13:45:50 No. 1522356 >>1522342 No,.everyone stop, the retarded shill is technically right, and admitting when we're wrong is the difference between us and them. Trump didn't legally rape E Jean Caroll, he only raped her colloquially, legally he just sexually assaulted her and defamed her. So trump isn't an adjudicated rapist, he's an adjudicated sex offender. Congrats. Now, do you realize defending the technical difference between a rapist and a sex offender makes you look about as good as defending the difference between a pedophile and an ehebephile? Congrats, you fought so hard for that win to defend a pedophile rapist. I hope being technically correct feels good you fascist faggot.>>
Anonymous 07/01/26(Wed)13:48:13 No. 1522358 >>1522356 >he's an adjudicated sex offender He's not an adjudicated sex offender either. That's a criminal offence, this was a civil trial. >defend a pedophile rapist You just concede that he is not a rapist, and you're adding a new accusation that he is a pedo? Someone is the BIG MAD xd>>
Anonymous 07/01/26(Wed)13:57:01 No. 1522361 >>1522358 He didn't meet the legal definition of being a rapist in the E Jean Carol case. That doesn't mean he's that he's not a rapist. If you're big mad, take some deep breaths. He admits to being a pedophile, he brags about watching underage girls dressing in pageants, and says creepy things to underage girls constantly. You're right, he's not an adjudicated sex offender either, he's immune from criminal prosecution. This would be like if there was a bowl of shit on the counter, and someone told you it was oatmeal. You just took a big spoonful and are smacking it around in your mouth. "Nope, it's just shit!" "Are you sure it isn't cereal? I think it's cereal!" *takes another bite*"Nope, stupid liggeral miggeral figgeral, it's JUST shit.">>
Anonymous 07/01/26(Wed)14:00:42 No. 1522363 >>1522361 >That doesn't mean he's that he's not a rapist. Jury found that he is not a rapist. >He admits to being a pedophile No, he does not. >this would be like... This would be like you saying some stupid shit and me correcting you, followed by you being upset about being corrected.>>
Anonymous 07/01/26(Wed)14:02:30 No. 1522366 >>1522363 do you really defend billionaire rapist pedophiles for free>>
Anonymous 07/01/26(Wed)14:04:57 No. 1522369 >>1522366 >correcting the ignorant shit you say >defending anyone If you want an echo chamber maybe you should go back to r*ddit.>>
Anonymous 07/01/26(Wed)14:05:51 No. 1522371 >>1522369 because it's pretty bizarre. how did you end up in this position?>>
Anonymous 07/01/26(Wed)14:09:39 No. 1522372 >>1522363 >Jury him liable for sexual assault and defamation, but he didn't meet the strict legal definition of rape. Cool, let's look at technical terms, and not focus on his disgusting actions.>No, he does not. Oh, sorry, you're right again, he admits to being an ehebephile, what an important distinction. How's the shit taste?>>
Anonymous 07/01/26(Wed)14:16:05 No. 1522375 >>1522371 Its bizarre that you would say some incorrect shit and someone would say "anon, that statement is incorrect"? >>1522372 >Cool, let's look at technical terms Yes, the initial statement relied on technical language saying he is an "adjudicated rapist". The statement is wholly incorrect. >he admits to being an ehebephile He does not.>>
Anonymous 07/01/26(Wed)14:19:49 No. 1522376 Half the thread is now off-topic garbage being posted by people that are most likely ban-evading. >Here's why that's a good thing. >>
Anonymous 07/01/26(Wed)14:29:23 No. 1522377 >>1522375 remind us, did trump (rapist) say >“I’m automatically attracted to beautiful women — I just start kissing them, it’s like a magnet. Just kiss. I don’t even wait. And when you’re a star, they let you do it. You can do anything" or not>>
Anonymous 07/01/26(Wed)15:03:55 No. 1522378 >>1522260 We didn't vote to let browns in, you absolute faggot. People had to be forced at literal gunpoint to allow minorities to have rights and representation here. If democracy were working as intended, we would have been allowed to kill everyone south of a California Tan in America.>>
Anonymous 07/01/26(Wed)15:06:40 No. 1522379 >We non american shill thinks this is proof, or something>>
Anonymous 07/01/26(Wed)15:21:05 No. 1522382 >>1522085 The same MSM that wants to convince us that the US lost against Iran also wants us to believe that Trump lost 3 times in a week. We all know they're lying. They know they're lying. fuck the left, fuck Israel, and fuck the MSM>>
Anonymous 07/01/26(Wed)15:56:35 No. 1522388 >>1522382 get a real job esl shill>>
Anonymous 07/01/26(Wed)16:42:05 No. 1522390 >>1522378 >We didn't vote I know.>>
Anonymous 07/01/26(Wed)17:19:31 No. 1522395 >We Hi, foreign esl shill 1522378 that will never vote in USA because you're not American.
Delete Post: [ File Only] Style: Yotsuba Yotsuba B Futaba Burichan Tomorrow Photon
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.